Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fast USDC transactions (operational) dashboard #10598

Open
2 tasks done
turadg opened this issue Dec 2, 2024 · 0 comments
Open
2 tasks done

Fast USDC transactions (operational) dashboard #10598

turadg opened this issue Dec 2, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@turadg
Copy link
Member

turadg commented Dec 2, 2024

What is the Problem Being Solved?

Users of the Fast USDC product need to be able to see the state of transactions.

Description of the Design

Users:

  • End-users requesting transfers (if they run into a problem)
  • LP / underwriters
  • OpCo

Requires an indexing server

Tasks

Preview Give feedback
  1. enhancement
    turadg
  2. rabi-siddique

Security Considerations

Scaling Considerations

Test Plan

Upgrade Considerations

@turadg turadg added the enhancement New feature or request label Dec 2, 2024
@turadg turadg added this to the FU4: UI integration milestone Dec 2, 2024
@turadg turadg self-assigned this Dec 2, 2024
mergify bot added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 17, 2024
refs: #10598

## Description
The dashboard will requires data for each transaction. In the course of designing that we explored how to design the storage node paths without creating too much cost in IAVL. (The data in HEAD carry a burden of magnitude O(k+v) for all network nodes (including non-validators) into perpetuity.)

Examining [the trade-offs](https://alpha.decidedly.co/d/b27cbb6a-df71-4136-aa27-3e947015e84b/view) we arrived at:
- store one node per transaction
  - push all changes through it
  - rely on indexer to demux
- delete on demand
  - when we have [an API for block-safe deletion](#7405) it can delete in the operation
  - until then keep track of what to delete
  - a core-eval can be run to cull data whenever necessary


### Security Considerations
none

### Scaling Considerations
One storage path per transaction, which persists until the deletion job is called.

One entry in a set to keep track of transactions to delete.

### Documentation Considerations
Not developer facing

### Testing Considerations
CI

### Upgrade Considerations
not yet deployed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant