Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add "Report bad data" to Agent Record #6361

Closed
acdoll opened this issue May 29, 2023 · 5 comments
Closed

Add "Report bad data" to Agent Record #6361

acdoll opened this issue May 29, 2023 · 5 comments
Labels
Enhancement I think this would make Arctos even awesomer! Function-Agents requires implementation approval Should ONLY be used with 'ready for implementation' to signify needed support (or rejection)

Comments

@acdoll
Copy link

acdoll commented May 29, 2023

Add this button to Agent Record page:
image

@acdoll acdoll added the Enhancement I think this would make Arctos even awesomer! label May 29, 2023
@dustymc dustymc added this to the ready for implementation milestone May 30, 2023
@dustymc
Copy link
Contributor

dustymc commented May 30, 2023

Here's the summary. https://github.com/ArctosDB/internal/issues/258 is still unresolved so IDK how to proceed, but I don't see why this isn't ready for dev.


Source

#6361

Summary

Add "Report bad data" to Agent Record

User Interface Changes

Data Structure Changes

add agent_id to table annotations

@Jegelewicz
Copy link
Member

Agree - this seems like a no-brainer.

@AJLinn
Copy link

AJLinn commented May 30, 2023

I just wonder if we know there’s bad data, since Agents is shared table, what’s stopping an operator from just updating the record and making curatorial remarks re: what we did?

Or are you proposing this be placed on the public view page? If so, I’d say to be sure to note that on the issue and then I’d definitely say yes, it’s a necessary and useful button to add!

@dustymc
Copy link
Contributor

dustymc commented May 30, 2023

Yes, https://arctos.database.museum/agent/21334341 is public.

@pwimbo
Copy link

pwimbo commented May 30, 2023 via email

@dustymc dustymc added the requires implementation approval Should ONLY be used with 'ready for implementation' to signify needed support (or rejection) label Aug 28, 2023
@dustymc dustymc closed this as completed Feb 27, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Enhancement I think this would make Arctos even awesomer! Function-Agents requires implementation approval Should ONLY be used with 'ready for implementation' to signify needed support (or rejection)
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants