Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Named ctor for empty property lists. #904

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 11, 2024
Merged

Named ctor for empty property lists. #904

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 11, 2024

Conversation

1uc
Copy link
Collaborator

@1uc 1uc commented Dec 19, 2023

Empty property lists have a valid HID, unlike default constructed properties which use H5P_DEFAULT.

This only matters when interfacing with HDF5 directly.

@1uc
Copy link
Collaborator Author

1uc commented Dec 19, 2023

See #786.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 19, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (04ae650) 85.96% compared to head (471ce6d) 85.96%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #904   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   85.96%   85.96%           
=======================================
  Files          89       89           
  Lines        5870     5870           
=======================================
  Hits         5046     5046           
  Misses        824      824           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@1uc 1uc marked this pull request as ready for review December 19, 2023 16:36
@1uc 1uc changed the title Name ctor for empty property lists. Named ctor for empty property lists. Dec 21, 2023
Empty property lists have a valid HID, unlike default constructed
properties which use H5P_DEFAULT.

This only matters when interfacing with HDF5 directly.
@1uc 1uc merged commit 9d50f3b into master Jan 11, 2024
36 checks passed
@1uc 1uc deleted the 1uc/empty-property-list branch January 11, 2024 14:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants