Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add test file needed for testing CaC content #493

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 23, 2024

Conversation

Vincent056
Copy link

Add required test file so we can test if datastream can be parsed correctly by parser.

@Vincent056
Copy link
Author

the e2e will fail because of ComplianceAsCode/content#11614

@BhargaviGudi
Copy link
Collaborator

/hold for test

@Vincent056
Copy link
Author

Vincent056 commented Feb 22, 2024

/hold for test

this will be internal for testing only changes @BhargaviGudi

@BhargaviGudi
Copy link
Collaborator

/unhold

pkg/utils/parse_arf_result_test.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/utils/parse_arf_result_test.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

@rhmdnd rhmdnd left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for adding some coverage for this case, Vincent.

Some potential optimizations based on some related comments in ComplianceAsCode/content#11615.

pkg/utils/parse_arf_result_test.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/utils/parse_arf_result_test.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@Vincent056
Copy link
Author

the e2e failure will be fix with #495

@rhmdnd
Copy link

rhmdnd commented Mar 15, 2024

Looks like this is ready for a rebase to pickup the fix in #495 .

Add required test file so we can test if datastream can be parsed correctly by parser.
Makefile Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Member

@yuumasato yuumasato left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/LGTM

defer ds.Close()

dsDom, err := ParseContent(ds)
Expect(err).NotTo(HaveOccurred())
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nitpick: This Expect() is redundant given the following It() and Expect() clause, right?

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 23, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: BhargaviGudi, Vincent056, yuumasato

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [BhargaviGudi,Vincent056]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 4596084 into ComplianceAsCode:master Apr 23, 2024
13 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants