Skip to content

Conversation

@sjoubert
Copy link
Contributor

@sjoubert sjoubert commented Nov 5, 2024

We think that passing the exact max query range to loki can lead to some rounding error if the values do not align with the current moon phase. Reducing drastically (from the default 30d1h default value) the query range should limit this issue.
Anyway, loki should not be used like that from the api, it's better suited for grafana and we should think going back to archiving logs in argo workflows directly.

We think that passing the exact max query range to loki can lead to some
rounding error if the values do not align with the current moon phase.
Reducing drastically (from the default 30d1h default value) the query
range should limit this issue.
Anyway, loki should not be used like that from the api, it's better
suited for grafana and we should think going back to archiving logs in
argo workflows directly.
@sjoubert sjoubert force-pushed the reduce_loki_query_range_PROD-14034 branch from 204cbc0 to f608c36 Compare November 5, 2024 16:35
Copy link
Member

@jreynard-code jreynard-code left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@sjoubert sjoubert merged commit f608c36 into main Nov 6, 2024
5 checks passed
@sjoubert sjoubert deleted the reduce_loki_query_range_PROD-14034 branch November 6, 2024 08:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants