merge original mixpanel repo changes into local fork #2
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request introduces several changes across multiple files, primarily focusing on the Mixpanel Swift SDK. Key modifications include the removal of SwiftLint steps from CI workflows for iOS and macOS, updates to versioning in various documentation files, and the introduction of new structures and protocols to support proxy server configurations. Notably, the version number has been updated from Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant Mixpanel
participant Server
User->>Mixpanel: Initialize with proxyServerConfig
Mixpanel->>Server: Send request with headers and query items
Server-->>Mixpanel: Response
Mixpanel-->>User: Return result
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Inline review comments failed to post. This is likely due to GitHub's limits when posting large numbers of comments.
🛑 Comments failed to post (76)
Sources/FlushRequest.swift (1)
24-26: 💡 Codebase verification
Proxy configuration documentation needs to be added
Based on the codebase analysis, proxy server support was added in v4.2.5 but lacks documentation in the SDK's README or markdown files. The feature allows:
- Custom proxy server URL configuration
- Adding custom headers and query parameters through
MixpanelProxyServerDelegate- Validation to prevent using proxy headers with Mixpanel's default API
Action items:
- Add proxy server configuration documentation to README.md
- Include code examples showing:
- How to initialize with proxy server config
- How to implement the delegate protocol
- Sample headers/query params usage
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify proxy configuration documentation
Since these changes support proxy server configurations, ensure that the usage is properly documented in the SDK documentation.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for proxy configuration documentation rg -i "proxy.*configuration|configure.*proxy" --type mdLength of output: 57
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check for any proxy-related documentation in README or docs fd -e md | xargs cat # Also check for any proxy-related code comments that might indicate documentation needs rg -i "proxy" --type swift -C 2Length of output: 32436
docs/undocumented.json (1)
11-23:
⚠️ Potential issueDocument the new proxy server configuration functionality
The newly added proxy server related types and members are currently undocumented:
ProxyServerConfigstruct and its initializerServerProxyResourcestruct, its initializer, and properties (queryItems,headers)Since this is a new feature introduced in version 4.3.0, proper documentation is essential for users to understand and implement proxy server configurations correctly.
Would you like me to help generate the documentation for these new types and members? This would include:
- Overview and purpose of each type
- Parameter descriptions for initializers
- Property descriptions and usage examples
Also applies to: 158-183
docs/Typealiases.html (1)
183-183:
⚠️ Potential issueFix incorrect last updated date
The last updated date is set to "2024-05-03" which appears to be incorrect as we are currently in November 2024.
- <p>© 2024 <a class="link" href="http://mixpanel.com" target="_blank" rel="external noopener">Mixpanel</a>. All rights reserved. (Last updated: 2024-05-03)</p> + <p>© 2024 <a class="link" href="http://mixpanel.com" target="_blank" rel="external noopener">Mixpanel</a>. All rights reserved. (Last updated: 2024-11-14)</p>📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.<p>© 2024 <a class="link" href="http://mixpanel.com" target="_blank" rel="external noopener">Mixpanel</a>. All rights reserved. (Last updated: 2024-11-14)</p>docs/docsets/Mixpanel.docset/Contents/Resources/Documents/Typealiases.html (2)
20-20: 💡 Codebase verification
Version number mismatch detected in documentation
The version numbers are inconsistent across the codebase:
Info.plistandMixpanel-swift.podspecshow version 4.3.0- All documentation HTML files show version 4.2.7
This inconsistency needs to be fixed to maintain proper versioning across the project. The documentation should be regenerated with the correct version number (4.3.0) to match the podspec and Info.plist files.
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify version number consistency across documentation.
The version number (4.2.7) and documentation coverage (80%) differ from what's mentioned in the AI summary (4.3.0). This inconsistency needs to be addressed.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check version numbers across documentation and configuration files # Expected: Consistent version numbers across all files # Search for version numbers in documentation files echo "Checking version numbers in documentation files:" rg -g "*.html" -g "*.plist" -g "*.podspec" "4\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+"Length of output: 8275
120-130: 💡 Codebase verification
Structure documentation exists but lacks detailed documentation
Both
ProxyServerConfigandServerProxyResourcestructures are properly implemented and linked in the documentation, but they lack detailed documentation comments explaining their purpose and usage. The structures are:
ProxyServerConfig: Has proper initialization with validation but is marked as "Undocumented" in the docsServerProxyResource: Has basic properties for query items and headers but is also marked as "Undocumented"🔗 Analysis chain
Verify structure documentation completeness.
The new Structures section with
ProxyServerConfigandServerProxyResourcehas been added. Ensure both structure documentation files exist and are properly linked.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if the structure documentation files exist # Expected: Files should exist and contain proper documentation # Check if the structure documentation files exist fd -g "ProxyServerConfig.html" -g "ServerProxyResource.html" docs/Length of output: 260
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's verify if ServerProxyResource.html exists and check the content of both structure files fd "ServerProxyResource.html" docs/ # Check the content of ProxyServerConfig.html to verify documentation rg -A 5 "ProxyServerConfig" docs/Structs/ProxyServerConfig.html # Check if ServerProxyResource is documented elsewhere or has a different name rg -i "ServerProxyResource" docs/Length of output: 72105
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the actual content of both structure files to verify their documentation rg -A 10 "struct ProxyServerConfig" docs/Structs/ProxyServerConfig.html rg -A 10 "struct ServerProxyResource" docs/Structs/ServerProxyResource.html # Also check if these structures are properly linked in the navigation rg -A 3 '<a href="Structs.html">Structures</a>' docs/index.htmlLength of output: 429
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the actual source files to verify the structure implementations ast-grep --pattern $'struct ProxyServerConfig { $$$ }' ast-grep --pattern $'struct ServerProxyResource { $$$ }' # Also check for any documentation comments rg -B 2 "struct (ProxyServerConfig|ServerProxyResource)"Length of output: 414
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the implementation details and documentation of both structures rg -A 10 "struct ServerProxyResource" Sources/Network.swift rg -A 10 "struct ProxyServerConfig" Sources/MixpanelInstance.swift # Also check if there are any references or usages of these structures rg "ServerProxyResource|ProxyServerConfig" Sources/ --type swiftLength of output: 1801
docs/Protocols/MixpanelDelegate.html (2)
20-20: 💡 Codebase verification
Documentation needs to be updated to match version 4.3.0
The documentation is currently showing version 4.2.7, but the podspec indicates version 4.3.0. According to the CHANGELOG.md, v4.3.0 is the latest release, dated 2024-07-19. The documentation should be regenerated to reflect the current version.
- All documentation files under
docs/show outdated version 4.2.7Mixpanel-swift.podspeccorrectly shows version 4.3.0- CHANGELOG.md confirms 4.3.0 as the latest version
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify version consistency across the project.
The documentation version has been updated to 4.2.7. Let's ensure this version is consistent across all project files.
Also applies to: 213-213
Version mismatch detected between documentation (4.2.7) and podspec (4.3.0)
Let me verify other potential version references in the documentation:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for version numbers to ensure consistency echo "Checking version numbers in various files..." rg -i "version.*4\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+" --type-add 'pod:*.podspec' --type pod --type swift --type htmlLength of output: 243
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search specifically in documentation files for version numbers echo "Checking version numbers in documentation..." fd . -e html -e md | xargs rg -i "4\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+"Length of output: 10151
112-114: 💡 Codebase verification
Documentation needs improvement for proxy server features
The documentation files exist but lack comprehensive content:
- MixpanelProxyServerDelegate: Missing discussion section explaining the protocol's purpose and usage
- ProxyServerConfig: Only contains declaration, missing property documentation and usage examples
- ServerProxyResource: Multiple declarations but no discussion or parameter documentation
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify the completeness of proxy server documentation.
New proxy server features have been added:
- MixpanelProxyServerDelegate protocol
- ProxyServerConfig structure
- ServerProxyResource structure
Let's ensure these new additions are properly integrated and documented.
Also applies to: 120-130
Let me verify the content of these documentation files to ensure they are properly integrated and contain meaningful documentation.
Let me check if the documentation files exist but are empty or malformed by examining their full content.
Let me check the actual documentation content beyond the headers to verify if the documentation is complete.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if all proxy-related files exist and are properly documented for doc in "MixpanelProxyServerDelegate" "ProxyServerConfig" "ServerProxyResource"; do echo "Checking $doc documentation..." if [ -f "docs/Protocols/$doc.html" ] || [ -f "docs/Structs/$doc.html" ]; then echo "✓ Documentation exists" else echo "✗ Missing documentation" fi done # Verify implementation files exist fd -e swift -e h proxyLength of output: 1024
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check content of proxy-related documentation files echo "=== MixpanelProxyServerDelegate Documentation ===" rg -A 5 "protocol MixpanelProxyServerDelegate" docs/Protocols/MixpanelProxyServerDelegate.html echo -e "\n=== ProxyServerConfig Documentation ===" rg -A 5 "struct ProxyServerConfig" docs/Structs/ProxyServerConfig.html echo -e "\n=== ServerProxyResource Documentation ===" rg -A 5 "struct ServerProxyResource" docs/Structs/ServerProxyResource.html # Check if there are any implementation references to these types echo -e "\n=== Implementation References ===" rg "MixpanelProxyServerDelegate|ProxyServerConfig|ServerProxyResource" --type swiftLength of output: 2076
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if documentation files exist and show their content echo "=== MixpanelProxyServerDelegate Documentation Content ===" if [ -f "docs/Protocols/MixpanelProxyServerDelegate.html" ]; then cat docs/Protocols/MixpanelProxyServerDelegate.html | head -n 20 fi echo -e "\n=== ProxyServerConfig Documentation Content ===" if [ -f "docs/Structs/ProxyServerConfig.html" ]; then cat docs/Structs/ProxyServerConfig.html | head -n 20 fi echo -e "\n=== ServerProxyResource Documentation Content ===" if [ -f "docs/Structs/ServerProxyResource.html" ]; then cat docs/Structs/ServerProxyResource.html | head -n 20 fi # Check source code documentation comments echo -e "\n=== Source Code Documentation Comments ===" rg "///.*(?:MixpanelProxyServerDelegate|ProxyServerConfig|ServerProxyResource)" --type swiftLength of output: 3565
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for protocol/struct definitions and their documentation in the source echo "=== Source Definitions and Documentation ===" rg -B 2 -A 2 "(?:protocol MixpanelProxyServerDelegate|struct ProxyServerConfig|struct ServerProxyResource)" --type swift # Check for method documentation in HTML files echo -e "\n=== Documentation Content ===" for file in docs/Protocols/MixpanelProxyServerDelegate.html docs/Structs/ProxyServerConfig.html docs/Structs/ServerProxyResource.html; do echo -e "\nChecking $file for method documentation..." rg "Declaration|Discussion|Parameters|Returns" "$file" doneLength of output: 2770
docs/docsets/Mixpanel.docset/Contents/Resources/Documents/Protocols/MixpanelDelegate.html (2)
20-20: 💡 Codebase verification
⚠️ Potential issueDocumentation version needs to be updated to 4.3.0
The version number in the documentation file shows
4.2.7, but the codebase clearly indicates that version4.3.0is the current version, as evidenced by multiple references in the source files:
return "4.3.0"s.version = '4.3.0'<string>4.3.0</string>The documentation should be synchronized with the actual version number.
🔗 Analysis chain
Version number inconsistency detected.
The version number
4.2.7appears to be incorrect. According to the AI summary, this PR should update to version4.3.0.Let's verify the correct version number:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for version numbers across the codebase rg -g '!*.html' '4\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+' --no-filename | sort -uLength of output: 1856
20-20: 💡 Codebase verification
Documentation needed for new proxy server functionality
Based on the verification results, I found that the recently added proxy server functionality (
ServerProxyResourcestruct and related code) lacks proper documentation comments, which explains the drop in documentation coverage from 83% to 80%. Specifically:
Sources/Network.swift: The newServerProxyResourcestruct and its public members need documentationSources/MixpanelInstance.swift: TheproxyServerDelegateproperty has minimal documentation compared to other public members🔗 Analysis chain
Documentation coverage has decreased.
The documentation coverage has dropped from 83% to 80%. This suggests that some of the new features or changes might not be fully documented.
Let's check which new additions might be missing documentation:
The previous commands didn't yield results, so I'm trying a different strategy to:
- Identify recently modified Swift files
- Look for public declarations that might need documentation
- Check the history of documentation coverage changes
I'm trying to:
- Find documentation comments to see if new public declarations are properly documented
- Verify the current documentation coverage percentage directly from the index file
This will help us determine if there are undocumented public declarations that caused the coverage drop.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for undocumented public declarations in Swift files ast-grep --pattern 'public $_ $name($_) { $$$ }' # Search for TODO/FIXME comments that might indicate missing documentation rg -g '*.swift' '(TODO|FIXME).*doc'Length of output: 90
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's try a different approach to find undocumented public declarations # First, let's find Swift files that were modified or added in this PR git diff --name-only origin/main HEAD | grep '\.swift$' # Then, let's look for public declarations in Swift files rg -g '*.swift' '^[[:space:]]*public' -A 1 # Also check the documentation coverage history git log -p -- docs/docsets/Mixpanel.docset/Contents/Resources/Documents/index.html | grep -A 1 "documented"Length of output: 9946
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the documentation comments for public declarations rg -g '*.swift' '///.*|/\*\*.*\*/' -B 1 -A 1 # Also check the current documentation coverage in the index file cat docs/docsets/Mixpanel.docset/Contents/Resources/Documents/index.html | grep -A 1 "documented"Length of output: 13532
docs/Extensions/Array.html (1)
216-216:
⚠️ Potential issueFuture date detected in documentation.
The documentation shows a last updated date of "2024-05-03", which is a future date.
Update the date to reflect the actual release date or current date:
- <p>© 2024 <a class="link" href="http://mixpanel.com" target="_blank" rel="external noopener">Mixpanel</a>. All rights reserved. (Last updated: 2024-05-03)</p> + <p>© 2023 <a class="link" href="http://mixpanel.com" target="_blank" rel="external noopener">Mixpanel</a>. All rights reserved. (Last updated: 2023-11-14)</p>Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
docs/docsets/Mixpanel.docset/Contents/Resources/Documents/Extensions/Array.html (1)
20-20: 💡 Codebase verification
Documentation coverage needs attention in specific areas
Based on the verification results, there are indeed undocumented elements across multiple components:
- Most critical areas needing documentation:
ServerProxyResourcestruct (4 undocumented elements)MixpanelInstanceclass (3 undocumented elements)ProxyServerConfigstruct (2 undocumented elements)- Several extensions (Array, String, NSNumber, etc.) each have 1 undocumented element
Consider prioritizing documentation for these components to improve the coverage back to the previous 83% level.
🔗 Analysis chain
Documentation coverage regression
The documentation coverage has decreased from 83% to 80%. Consider addressing the undocumented elements to maintain or improve the previous coverage level.
Let me gather more specific information about the documentation coverage by checking the previous version.
Let me try one more verification to get more specific information about the documentation coverage.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for undocumented elements across the codebase # Search for "Undocumented" strings in documentation files rg -l "Undocumented" docs/Length of output: 2424
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check git history for the specific file to see previous coverage percentage git log -p docs/docsets/Mixpanel.docset/Contents/Resources/Documents/Extensions/Array.html | grep -B 5 "documented)"Length of output: 0
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for any recent documentation-related changes git log --since="1 month ago" --grep="doc" --oneline # Also check the source files that might need documentation fd ".swift$" Sources/ --exec grep -l "^[[:space:]]*///" {} \;Length of output: 262
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the current documentation files for undocumented elements count rg "Undocumented" docs/docsets/Mixpanel.docset/Contents/Resources/Documents/ -c # Also check the source files for public declarations that might need documentation ast-grep --pattern 'public $$$'Length of output: 1939
docs/Extensions/Int.html (1)
20-20: 💡 Codebase verification
Version number inconsistency detected
The version number 4.2.7 in the documentation files does not match the current version 4.3.0 found in:
- Mixpanel-swift.podspec
- Info.plist
- Sources/AutomaticProperties.swift
- scripts/generate_docs.sh
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify version number consistency.
The version has been updated to 4.2.7 and the last update date is set to 2024-05-03.
Also applies to: 217-217
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check version number consistency across the project # Search for version numbers in various file types rg -g "!{.git,node_modules,build,dist}/*" "4\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+" # Check package configuration files specifically fd -e json -e plist -e podspec . -x cat {} \; | rg "version"Length of output: 65877
docs/docsets/Mixpanel.docset/Contents/Resources/Documents/Extensions/Int.html (1)
120-130: 💡 Codebase verification
Documentation is missing for proxy server structures
Both
ProxyServerConfigandServerProxyResourcestructures, along with their public properties and methods, are marked as "Undocumented" in the generated documentation. These structures need proper documentation:
ProxyServerConfig:
- Structure description
init(serverUrl:delegate:)methodserverUrlanddelegateproperties
ServerProxyResource:
- Structure description
init(queryItems:headers:)methodqueryItemsandheadersproperties🔗 Analysis chain
Verify structure documentation completeness.
Two new structures have been added:
ProxyServerConfigServerProxyResourceThese structures are crucial for the proxy server feature and should be well-documented.
Let's verify the structure documentation:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check structure documentation completeness # Search for structure documentation rg -A 10 "struct (ProxyServerConfig|ServerProxyResource)" docs/Length of output: 65
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's try searching in the source code first to understand these structures rg -A 10 "struct (ProxyServerConfig|ServerProxyResource)" # Also search for documentation files with different extensions fd -e swift -e md -e html "ProxyServerConfig|ServerProxyResource"Length of output: 1838
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the content of the documentation files cat docs/Structs/ProxyServerConfig.html docs/Structs/ServerProxyResource.html # Also check if there are any undocumented public properties or methods ast-grep --pattern 'public struct ProxyServerConfig { $$$ }' ast-grep --pattern 'public struct ServerProxyResource { $$$ }'Length of output: 20339
docs/Extensions/Optional.html (1)
20-20: 💡 Codebase verification
Documentation needed for proxy server components
The verification confirms multiple undocumented elements in the new proxy server features:
ServerProxyResourcestruct and its members are undocumentedProxyServerConfigstruct and its members are undocumentedPlease add documentation for these components to restore the coverage level and ensure proper API documentation.
🔗 Analysis chain
Documentation coverage has decreased to 80%
The documentation coverage has dropped from 83% to 80%, which might indicate that the newly added proxy server features need additional documentation.
Would you like assistance in improving the documentation coverage for the new proxy server features?
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for undocumented elements in proxy server related files rg -i "undocumented|TODO" --type html docs/Protocols/MixpanelProxyServerDelegate.html docs/Structs/ProxyServerConfig.html docs/Structs/ServerProxyResource.htmlLength of output: 625
docs/docsets/Mixpanel.docset/Contents/Resources/Documents/Extensions/Optional.html (2)
112-114:
⚠️ Potential issueNew proxy server features require documentation.
The newly added protocol
MixpanelProxyServerDelegateand structuresProxyServerConfig,ServerProxyResourceappear to be part of the proxy server configuration feature. However, the decreased documentation coverage suggests these new additions might lack proper documentation.Would you like me to help generate documentation templates for these new additions? This would help improve the documentation coverage back to its previous level.
Also applies to: 120-130
20-20: 💡 Codebase verification
⚠️ Potential issueBased on the gathered information, I can now provide the final response:
Documentation coverage decrease confirmed - New proxy server components need documentation
The coverage drop from 83% to 80% appears to be due to newly added proxy server components lacking proper documentation:
ServerProxyResourcestruct in Network.swift is missing documentation commentsProxyServerConfigstruct in MixpanelInstance.swift is missing documentation comments- While
MixpanelProxyServerDelegateprotocol has a documentation header, its methods need documentation🔗 Analysis chain
Documentation coverage has decreased.
The documentation coverage has dropped from 83% to 80%, indicating that new features or changes may lack proper documentation.
Let me gather more information about the documentation coverage history to verify this concern.
Let me check the actual content of the documentation files to verify the coverage percentage.
Let me check specifically for the undocumented public declarations in the new proxy server related code, as these might be contributing to the coverage drop.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for undocumented entities in the new proxy server related files # Search for public declarations without documentation comments rg -A 5 "public (protocol MixpanelProxyServerDelegate|struct (ProxyServerConfig|ServerProxyResource))"Length of output: 1452
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check documentation coverage history by looking at previous versions fd -e html 'index.html' docs/docsets/ -x grep -l "documented" # Also check for any recent undocumented public declarations ast-grep --pattern 'public $_($$$) { $$$ }'Length of output: 176
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the content of the current and previous documentation index files cat docs/docsets/Mixpanel.docset/Contents/Resources/Documents/index.html | grep -A 2 "Mixpanel.*Docs.*documented" # Look for undocumented public declarations specifically in new files rg "public" Sources/ -A 1 | grep -v "/\*\*" | grep "public"Length of output: 6143
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for documentation comments above the proxy server related declarations rg -B 3 "public (protocol MixpanelProxyServerDelegate|struct (ProxyServerConfig|ServerProxyResource))" Sources/ # Also check if there are any previous documentation coverage numbers fd . docs/docsets -t f -e html -x grep -l "83%"Length of output: 781
docs/Extensions/Bool.html (2)
20-20: 💡 Codebase verification
Version number inconsistency detected
The documentation shows version 4.2.7, but the actual version in the source code (AutomaticProperties.swift) and podspec is 4.3.0. This inconsistency needs to be addressed.
docs/*.html: Shows version 4.2.7Sources/AutomaticProperties.swift: Returns version "4.3.0"Mixpanel-swift.podspec: Uses version '4.3.0'🔗 Analysis chain
Verify version number consistency.
The version number has been updated to 4.2.7. Ensure this version is consistent across all project files.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check version number consistency across project files # Search for version numbers in common configuration files echo "Checking version numbers in files:" rg -A 1 "version.*=.*[\"']4\." docs/ *.podspec Info.plist rg -A 1 "## \[4\." CHANGELOG.mdLength of output: 284
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's search more thoroughly for version numbers across the codebase echo "Searching for version numbers in docs:" rg -i "mixpanel.*4\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+" docs/ echo -e "\nSearching for version strings in source files:" rg "\"4\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\"" Sources/ echo -e "\nChecking package version in Package.swift:" cat Package.swift | grep -A 1 "version" echo -e "\nChecking all HTML files in docs for version numbers:" fd -e html . docs/ -x grep -l "4\.[0-9]\.[0-9]"Length of output: 11956
112-114: 💡 Codebase verification
Documentation is incomplete for proxy server components
The documentation check reveals:
MixpanelProxyServerDelegateprotocol is properly documented with its purposeProxyServerConfigstruct is marked as "Undocumented"ServerProxyResourcestruct and its members are marked as "Undocumented"Required documentation updates:
- Add documentation for
ProxyServerConfigstruct explaining its purpose and initialization parameters- Document
ServerProxyResourcestruct including its properties (queryItems,headers) and initialization- Ensure all public members of these types are properly documented
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify proxy server feature documentation.
New proxy server related components (
MixpanelProxyServerDelegate,ProxyServerConfig,ServerProxyResource) have been added to the documentation structure. Ensure these components are properly documented in their respective files.Also applies to: 120-130
Let me gather more information about the documentation content to verify its completeness.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check documentation completeness for proxy server components # Check for documentation files fd -e html "MixpanelProxyServerDelegate|ProxyServerConfig|ServerProxyResource" docs/ # Check implementation files for documentation comments ast-grep --pattern $'/// $$$ public protocol MixpanelProxyServerDelegate { $$$ }' ast-grep --pattern $'/// $$$ public struct ProxyServerConfig { $$$ }' ast-grep --pattern $'/// $$$ public struct ServerProxyResource { $$$ }'Length of output: 722
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the content of documentation files for completeness for file in "docs/Protocols/MixpanelProxyServerDelegate.html" "docs/Structs/ProxyServerConfig.html" "docs/Structs/ServerProxyResource.html"; do echo "=== Content of $file ===" cat "$file" | grep -A 5 "<section class=\"section\">" || true done # Search for implementation details to cross-reference with documentation rg -A 3 "protocol MixpanelProxyServerDelegate|struct ProxyServerConfig|struct ServerProxyResource"Length of output: 4390
docs/docsets/Mixpanel.docset/Contents/Resources/Documents/Extensions/Bool.html (1)
20-20: 💡 Codebase verification
Documentation needed for new proxy server functionality
The verification confirms multiple undocumented elements in the new proxy server related files:
ServerProxyResourcestruct and its properties are undocumentedProxyServerConfigstruct and its property are undocumentedPlease add documentation for these new proxy server components to improve the overall documentation coverage.
🔗 Analysis chain
Documentation coverage has decreased to 80%
The documentation coverage has dropped from 83% to 80%. This might indicate that the new proxy server functionality (ProxyServerConfig, ServerProxyResource, MixpanelProxyServerDelegate) needs additional documentation.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for undocumented elements in the new proxy server related files rg -i "undocumented" docs/docsets/Mixpanel.docset/Contents/Resources/Documents/Protocols/MixpanelProxyServerDelegate.html docs/docsets/Mixpanel.docset/Contents/Resources/Documents/Structs/ProxyServerConfig.html docs/docsets/Mixpanel.docset/Contents/Resources/Documents/Structs/ServerProxyResource.htmlLength of output: 1083
docs/docsets/Mixpanel.docset/Contents/Resources/Documents/Extensions/UInt.html (3)
20-20: 💡 Codebase verification
Version number inconsistency detected
The version numbers are inconsistent across the codebase:
- Documentation files show version 4.2.7
- Podspec file shows version 4.3.0
- CHANGELOG.md shows latest version as 4.2.7
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify version number consistency
The documentation version has been updated to 4.2.7. Ensure this version number is consistent across all documentation and source files.
Also applies to: 217-217
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check version numbers in various files echo "Checking version numbers in documentation and source files..." rg "4\.2\.7|4\.1\.4" # Check package version echo "Checking package version..." fd "package.swift|podspec" --exec cat {}Length of output: 11321
20-20: 💡 Codebase verification
Documentation coverage decrease is related to new proxy server functionality
Based on the analysis of the codebase, the documentation coverage drop from 83% to 80% appears to be primarily due to newly added proxy server-related APIs that lack documentation:
- Undocumented protocol
MixpanelProxyServerDelegate- Undocumented struct
ProxyServerConfigand its public members- Undocumented struct
ServerProxyResourceand its public membersThese new additions are part of the proxy server functionality introduced in version 4.2.7, and their lack of documentation has contributed to the overall coverage decrease.
🔗 Analysis chain
Documentation coverage has decreased to 80%
The documentation coverage has dropped from 83% to 80%, which might indicate that some of the newly added features lack proper documentation.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for undocumented public APIs in Swift files rg "public (class|struct|protocol|enum|func)" -A 3 | rg -v "///" -v "/*"Length of output: 115
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for Swift files first fd "\.swift$" | while read -r file; do echo "=== $file ===" # Look for public declarations without documentation comments awk '/^[[:space:]]*public/ && !p {print} {p=0} /^\s*\/\/\// {p=1}' "$file" doneLength of output: 16696
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if there's a changelog or release notes that might explain the coverage drop fd -g "*CHANGELOG*" -g "*RELEASE*" -g "*changes*" -iLength of output: 207
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Look for jazzy configuration file to understand documentation settings fd -g ".jazzy.yaml" -g ".jazzy.yml"Length of output: 131
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check documentation coverage in previous versions using git git show HEAD~1:docs/docsets/Mixpanel.docset/Contents/Resources/Documents/Extensions/UInt.html | grep -A 1 -B 1 "documented"Length of output: 480
112-114: 💡 Codebase verification
Documentation missing for proxy server types
The codebase verification reveals incomplete documentation:
MixpanelProxyServerDelegateprotocol is properly documented with purpose and return value descriptionsProxyServerConfigstruct lacks documentation comments explaining its purpose and usageServerProxyResourcestruct lacks documentation comments explaining its role and properties🔗 Analysis chain
Verify proxy server documentation completeness
New proxy server functionality has been added with
MixpanelProxyServerDelegateprotocol and related structures (ProxyServerConfig,ServerProxyResource). Ensure these are properly documented in their respective files.Also applies to: 120-130
Let me check if there are any documentation comments for
ServerProxyResourceandProxyServerConfigsince we already see thatMixpanelProxyServerDelegateis documented.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if the new proxy server types have documentation rg -A 10 "public (protocol MixpanelProxyServerDelegate|struct ProxyServerConfig|struct ServerProxyResource)"Length of output: 2310
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for documentation comments above these types rg -B 5 "public (struct ServerProxyResource|struct ProxyServerConfig)"Length of output: 650
docs/Extensions/Float.html (1)
20-20: 💡 Codebase verification
Documentation coverage decrease is justified by new proxy server features
The documentation coverage decrease from 83% to 80% appears to be due to newly added proxy server functionality that lacks documentation comments. Specifically:
- New undocumented public APIs:
ServerProxyResourcestruct and its properties inSources/Network.swiftMixpanelProxyServerDelegateprotocol inSources/MixpanelInstance.swiftProxyServerConfigstruct inSources/MixpanelInstance.swiftConsider adding documentation comments for these new proxy server-related APIs to improve the documentation coverage.
🔗 Analysis chain
Documentation coverage has decreased.
The documentation coverage has dropped from 83% to 80%. This decrease might indicate that new features (like proxy server functionality) need additional documentation.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for undocumented public APIs in the codebase # Search for public APIs without documentation comments rg -U "public (class|struct|protocol|enum|func|var)" -g "*.swift" | \ rg -v "///" -v "/\*\*" -B 1Length of output: 141
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's try a different approach to check documentation coverage # First, let's find Swift source files and count them echo "Total Swift files:" fd -e swift | wc -l # Count files with public APIs echo -e "\nFiles with public APIs:" rg "public (class|struct|protocol|enum|func|var)" -l -g "*.swift" | wc -l # Count files with documentation comments echo -e "\nFiles with documentation comments:" rg "///" -l -g "*.swift" | wc -l # List public APIs without preceding documentation echo -e "\nPotentially undocumented public APIs:" rg -B 1 "^[[:space:]]*public" -g "*.swift" | grep -v "///"Length of output: 8442
docs/docsets/Mixpanel.docset/Contents/Resources/Documents/Extensions/Float.html (4)
217-217:
⚠️ Potential issueFix incorrect documentation generation date.
The documentation shows a last updated date of "2024-05-03", which is inconsistent as it's a future date compared to the current date.
Please regenerate the documentation with the correct date.
120-130: 💡 Codebase verification
Documentation for proxy server structures needs improvement
The documentation files exist but lack essential elements:
- Both structures are missing descriptions explaining their purpose and usage
ProxyServerConfigshows only the initializer without documenting its propertiesServerProxyResourceproperties (queryItemsandheaders) lack descriptions of their purpose🔗 Analysis chain
Verify documentation for new proxy server structures.
New structures
ProxyServerConfigandServerProxyResourcehave been added to the navigation. Let's ensure their documentation is complete.Let's verify the structure documentation:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if the structure documentation files exist and contain content for struct in "ProxyServerConfig" "ServerProxyResource"; do if [ -f "docs/docsets/Mixpanel.docset/Contents/Resources/Documents/Structs/${struct}.html" ]; then echo "${struct} documentation exists. Checking content..." rg -l "struct.*${struct}" "docs/docsets/Mixpanel.docset/Contents/Resources/Documents/Structs/${struct}.html" else echo "${struct} documentation file is missing" fi doneLength of output: 1017
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the content of structure documentation for completeness for struct in "ProxyServerConfig" "ServerProxyResource"; do echo "=== ${struct} Documentation Content ===" # Look for key documentation elements: description, properties, initializers rg -A 5 "Declaration|Description|Parameters|Properties" "docs/docsets/Mixpanel.docset/Contents/Resources/Documents/Structs/${struct}.html" doneLength of output: 3417
112-114: 💡 Codebase verification
Documentation for MixpanelProxyServerDelegate is incomplete
The protocol documentation exists but lacks essential components:
- Missing Discussion section explaining the protocol's purpose and usage
- Parameter documentation appears incomplete (shows "mixpanel" parameter but declaration shows "name")
- No documentation about the return type
ServerProxyResource🔗 Analysis chain
Verify MixpanelProxyServerDelegate documentation exists.
The protocol has been added to the navigation, but we should ensure its documentation is complete.
Let's verify the protocol documentation:
Let me check the actual content of the protocol documentation to ensure it's properly documented.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if the protocol documentation file exists and contains content if [ -f "docs/docsets/Mixpanel.docset/Contents/Resources/Documents/Protocols/MixpanelProxyServerDelegate.html" ]; then echo "File exists. Checking content..." rg -l "protocol.*MixpanelProxyServerDelegate" docs/docsets/Mixpanel.docset/Contents/Resources/Documents/Protocols/MixpanelProxyServerDelegate.html else echo "Protocol documentation file is missing" fiLength of output: 438
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the content of the protocol documentation cat docs/docsets/Mixpanel.docset/Contents/Resources/Documents/Protocols/MixpanelProxyServerDelegate.html | grep -A 20 "Discussion" || echo "No discussion section found" # Also check for method documentation cat docs/docsets/Mixpanel.docset/Contents/Resources/Documents/Protocols/MixpanelProxyServerDelegate.html | grep -A 20 "Declaration" || echo "No declaration section found"Length of output: 1562
20-20: 💡 Codebase verification
⚠️ Potential issueVersion mismatch needs to be addressed
The documentation version (4.2.7) is inconsistent with the podspec version (4.3.0). This needs to be updated to maintain consistency across the codebase.
- All documentation files show version 4.2.7
- The podspec file defines version as 4.3.0
- Documentation coverage is consistently reported as 80% across all files
🔗 Analysis chain
Version inconsistency and documentation coverage concerns.
Two issues need attention:
- The version number (4.2.7) in this file differs from the version (4.3.0) mentioned in other files.
- The documentation coverage has decreased from 83% to 80%, suggesting that some new features might be missing documentation.
Let's verify version consistency across documentation files:
Let me verify the version number in other important files like package files or version configuration files:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for version numbers in documentation files rg -g "*.html" -g "*.md" "4\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+" docs/Length of output: 8076
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for version numbers in package files and other common version files rg "version" -g "*.podspec" -g "*.plist" -g "*.json" -g "*.swift" --no-filenameLength of output: 5894
docs/Extensions/Dictionary.html (2)
112-114: 💡 Codebase verification
Documentation is incomplete for proxy server features
The documentation check reveals:
- MixpanelProxyServerDelegate has basic documentation but lacks code examples
- ProxyServerConfig is completely undocumented with "Undocumented" placeholders
- ServerProxyResource is completely undocumented with "Undocumented" placeholders
Please add comprehensive documentation including:
- Description of each type's purpose and usage
- Documentation for all properties and methods
- Code examples demonstrating typical use cases
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify documentation for new proxy server features.
New proxy server related entities have been added to the navigation:
- Protocol: MixpanelProxyServerDelegate
- Structures: ProxyServerConfig and ServerProxyResource
Please ensure that these new entities have complete documentation with usage examples.
swift" docs/Protocols/MixpanelProxyServerDelegate.html docs/Structs/ProxyServerConfig.html docs/Structs/ServerProxyResource.html
Also applies to: 120-130 </details> <details> <summary>🏁 Scripts executed</summary> The following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Description: Check for documentation completeness in the new proxy server related files # Check if documentation files exist for new entities fd -e html "MixpanelProxyServerDelegate|ProxyServerConfig|ServerProxyResource" docs/ # Check for code examples in documentation rg -A 5 "Length of output: 606
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the content of these documentation files to verify completeness # Check for code examples and documentation in MixpanelProxyServerDelegate echo "=== Checking MixpanelProxyServerDelegate documentation ===" rg -U "(?s)<h2.*?</div>" docs/Protocols/MixpanelProxyServerDelegate.html # Check for code examples and documentation in ProxyServerConfig echo "=== Checking ProxyServerConfig documentation ===" rg -U "(?s)<h2.*?</div>" docs/Structs/ProxyServerConfig.html # Check for code examples and documentation in ServerProxyResource echo "=== Checking ServerProxyResource documentation ===" rg -U "(?s)<h2.*?</div>" docs/Structs/ServerProxyResource.html # Check specifically for code examples echo "=== Checking for code examples ===" rg -U "(?s)<code class=\"language-swift\".*?</code>" docs/Protocols/MixpanelProxyServerDelegate.html docs/Structs/ProxyServerConfig.html docs/Structs/ServerProxyResource.htmlLength of output: 801
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's try a simpler approach to check the content of these files # Check MixpanelProxyServerDelegate content echo "=== Content of MixpanelProxyServerDelegate.html ===" cat docs/Protocols/MixpanelProxyServerDelegate.html | grep -A 5 "<p>" # Check ProxyServerConfig content echo "=== Content of ProxyServerConfig.html ===" cat docs/Structs/ProxyServerConfig.html | grep -A 5 "<p>" # Check ServerProxyResource content echo "=== Content of ServerProxyResource.html ===" cat docs/Structs/ServerProxyResource.html | grep -A 5 "<p>"Length of output: 5424
20-20: 💡 Codebase verification
Documentation coverage decrease is due to newly added proxy server features
The documentation coverage drop from 83% to 80% is confirmed to be due to undocumented proxy server related features, specifically:
ProxyServerConfigstruct and its initializerServerProxyResourcestruct and its properties (queryItems, headers)The proxy server features are functional but lack proper documentation, which explains the coverage decrease.
🔗 Analysis chain
Documentation coverage has decreased.
The documentation coverage has dropped from 83% to 80%, which might indicate that the newly added proxy server features are not fully documented.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for undocumented elements in the new proxy server related files # Search for public declarations without documentation comments ast-grep --pattern 'public $$$' ProxyServerConfig.swift ServerProxyResource.swift MixpanelProxyServerDelegate.swift # Search for TODO or FIXME comments in documentation rg -i "todo|fixme" docs/Length of output: 369
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's first find the actual Swift source files related to proxy server fd -e swift -x grep -l "ProxyServer" {} # Then check documentation coverage in those files fd -e swift -x grep -l "ProxyServer" {} | xargs ast-grep --pattern '/// $$$' # Also search for any proxy server related documentation rg -i "proxyserver" docs/Length of output: 89804
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's find the Swift source files to check their documentation fd -e swift -x grep -l -i "proxyserver" {} | xargs cat # Also check undocumented.json for specific details about undocumented items cat docs/undocumented.jsonLength of output: 88874
docs/docsets/Mixpanel.docset/Contents/Resources/Documents/Extensions/Dictionary.html (1)
112-114: 💡 Codebase verification
Based on the results from all verification attempts, I can now provide a final response:
Documentation needed for proxy server integration components
The proxy server components are undocumented and lack integration examples:
ProxyServerConfigstruct and its initializer are marked as "undocumented"ServerProxyResourcestruct and its properties are marked as "undocumented"- No usage examples or integration guides found in markdown files
- No test files demonstrating proxy server configuration
Required documentation:
- Integration setup guide for proxy server configuration
- Example usage of
ProxyServerConfigandServerProxyResource- Security considerations and best practices
- Configuration examples for common use cases
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify proxy server integration documentation.
New proxy-related components have been added to the documentation structure:
- Protocol:
MixpanelProxyServerDelegate- Structs:
ProxyServerConfig,ServerProxyResourceThese additions suggest significant architectural changes for proxy server support.
Ensure that the documentation includes:
- Clear integration guidelines for proxy server setup
- Security considerations when using proxy servers
- Configuration examples for common use cases
- Performance implications of using proxy servers
Also applies to: 120-130
Let me analyze the results and generate additional verification scripts to check for proxy server documentation and implementation details.
The previous results showed the proxy server components exist but are undocumented. Let's verify if there are implementation examples and test cases to help understand the integration requirements.
Let me generate one final verification script to check for proxy server implementation details.
This will help us verify the implementation details and determine if there are any usage examples that could serve as documentation.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the completeness of proxy server documentation # Check if implementation files exist for the new components fd -e swift "ProxyServer" # Search for usage examples and integration guides fd -e md "proxy" -X cat {} \; # Look for configuration examples rg -A 5 "ProxyServerConfig|ServerProxyResource"Length of output: 131180
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for proxy server implementation details and documentation # Look for proxy server delegate protocol implementation details ast-grep --pattern $'protocol MixpanelProxyServerDelegate { $$$ }' # Search for proxy server configuration examples in markdown files fd -e md . -X rg -l "proxy.*server" # Look for proxy server initialization examples rg -A 5 "initialize.*proxyServerConfig:" # Check for any proxy server related tests fd -e swift test -X rg -l "proxy.*server"Length of output: 58682
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Look for proxy server implementation details # Search for proxy server delegate protocol implementation ast-grep --pattern $'protocol MixpanelProxyServerDelegate { $$$ }' # Search for proxy server initialization code ast-grep --pattern $'init(serverUrl: $_, delegate: $_) { $$$ }' # Look for proxy server usage examples in source files rg -A 5 "proxyServerConfig.*init\("Length of output: 174
docs/Extensions/Double.html (1)
217-217:
⚠️ Potential issueInvalid future date detected in documentation.
The documentation shows a last updated date of "2024-05-03", which is in the future relative to the current date (November 2024). This might cause confusion for users checking the documentation's freshness.
Please update the date to reflect the actual last update date.
docs/Extensions/String.html (1)
112-114: 💡 Codebase verification
Missing documentation for proxy server components
The proxy server functionality is only partially documented:
MixpanelProxyServerDelegateprotocol has documented purpose and methodProxyServerConfigstruct and its members are undocumentedServerProxyResourcestruct and its members are undocumentedPlease add documentation for:
ProxyServerConfigstruct and its initializerServerProxyResourcestruct and its properties (queryItems,headers)🔗 Analysis chain
Verify the completeness of proxy server documentation.
The addition of
MixpanelProxyServerDelegateprotocol and related structures (ProxyServerConfig,ServerProxyResource) suggests significant proxy server functionality changes. Let's ensure all proxy-related components are properly documented.Also applies to: 120-130
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for proxy-related documentation completeness rg -A 5 'MixpanelProxyServerDelegate|ProxyServerConfig|ServerProxyResource' docs/Length of output: 112680
docs/docsets/Mixpanel.docset/Contents/Resources/Documents/Extensions/Double.html (2)
217-217:
⚠️ Potential issueFuture date detected in documentation footer.
The last updated date (2024-05-03) is set to a future date. This should be corrected to reflect the actual documentation generation date.
20-20: 💡 Codebase verification
Documentation needs to be regenerated to match version 4.3.0
The version inconsistency is confirmed. The documentation shows version 4.2.7, while the actual version in the codebase is 4.3.0 as evidenced in:
- Mixpanel-swift.podspec: version '4.3.0'
- Info.plist: version '4.3.0'
- Sources/AutomaticProperties.swift: version '4.3.0'
The documentation appears to be outdated and needs to be regenerated using the script at
scripts/generate_docs.shwhich is already configured with the correct version 4.3.0.🔗 Analysis chain
Version number inconsistency and documentation coverage decrease.
Two concerns:
- The version number (4.2.7) in this file doesn't match the version (4.3.0) mentioned in other files.
- The documentation coverage has decreased from 83% to 80%.
Let's verify the version number across the codebase:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check version numbers across the codebase # Look for version numbers in common locations rg -g '!*.html' '4\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+' --no-headingLength of output: 2211
docs/docsets/Mixpanel.docset/Contents/Resources/Documents/Extensions/String.html (2)
20-20: 💡 Codebase verification
Version inconsistency detected across documentation and source files
The documentation shows version 4.2.7, but the actual package version in source files is 4.3.0:
- Podspec version: 4.3.0
- Info.plist version: 4.3.0
- Documentation version: 4.2.7
The documentation needs to be regenerated to reflect the current version 4.3.0.
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify version consistency across the codebase
The version has been updated to 4.2.7. Let's verify this version number is consistent across all relevant files.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check version numbers across the codebase echo "=== Version Numbers ===" rg -g "!*.html" "4\.2\.7|4\.1\.4" # Check package manifest files specifically echo -e "\n=== Package Manifests ===" fd -e podspec -e json -e plist -e xcconfig | xargs rg "version|Version"Length of output: 28803
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check version numbers in key files more specifically echo "=== Podspec Version ===" cat Mixpanel-swift.podspec | grep "s.version" echo -e "\n=== Package Version ===" cat Package.swift | grep -i "version" echo -e "\n=== Info.plist Version ===" cat Info.plist | grep -A1 "CFBundleShortVersionString" echo -e "\n=== Documentation Version References ===" fd . docs -e html -e md | xargs rg "4\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+"Length of output: 8664
20-20: 💡 Codebase verification
Documentation coverage decrease is expected due to new proxy server features
The documentation coverage drop from 83% to 80% appears to be related to the newly added proxy server functionality. While the core protocol
MixpanelProxyServerDelegateis properly documented with a header comment, some of the related structures (ServerProxyResourceandProxyServerConfig) lack documentation comments. This is likely a temporary state as these are new additions that are still being integrated.
Sources/Network.swift:ServerProxyResourcestruct needs documentationSources/MixpanelInstance.swift:ProxyServerConfigstruct needs documentation🔗 Analysis chain
Documentation coverage has decreased to 80%
The documentation coverage has dropped from 83% to 80%. This might indicate that some of the new proxy server functionality is not fully documented.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Find undocumented public APIs in the codebase # Look for public declarations without documentation comments # Search for public declarations in Swift files rg "public (class|struct|protocol|enum|func|var|let)" -g "*.swift" -A 2 | \ # Filter out lines that have documentation comments rg -v "///" -v "/\*\*" -B 2Length of output: 147
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's try a different approach to find undocumented public APIs # First, let's check if we can find Swift files fd ".swift$" # Then let's try to find public declarations and their documentation context rg "public (class|struct|protocol|enum|func|var|let)" --type swift -B 2Length of output: 14091
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's specifically look for the new proxy server related code to check documentation rg -B 3 "public (protocol MixpanelProxyServerDelegate|struct (ServerProxyResource|ProxyServerConfig))" --type swiftLength of output: 737
docs/Extensions/NSArray.html (1)
20-20: 💡 Codebase verification
Based on the results, I can now generate the final response:
Documentation coverage decrease is justified but needs attention
The decrease in documentation coverage is due to newly added proxy server features that are partially documented:
MixpanelProxyServerDelegateprotocol is properly documented with detailed commentsServerProxyResourcestruct lacks documentationProxyServerConfigstruct has minimal inline documentationAction items:
- Add documentation for
ServerProxyResourcestruct inSources/Network.swift- Enhance documentation for
ProxyServerConfigstruct inSources/MixpanelInstance.swift- Consider documenting the proxy server configuration parameters in the initialization methods
🔗 Analysis chain
Documentation coverage has decreased to 80%
The documentation coverage has dropped from 83% to 80%. This decrease might indicate that some of the newly added features (like proxy server configurations) need additional documentation.
Let me gather more specific information about the documentation coverage changes.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Find undocumented public APIs in the codebase rg "///|/\*\*" --type swift --files-without-matchLength of output: 2133
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for new proxy server related files and their documentation rg -l "MixpanelProxyServerDelegate|ProxyServerConfig|ServerProxyResource" --type swift # Then check if these files have documentation rg "///|/\*\*" -C2 "MixpanelProxyServerDelegate|ProxyServerConfig|ServerProxyResource" --type swiftLength of output: 372
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the content of these specific files for proxy server related code and their documentation rg -B3 -A3 "MixpanelProxyServerDelegate|ProxyServerConfig|ServerProxyResource" Sources/Network.swift Sources/MixpanelInstance.swift Sources/Mixpanel.swift # Also check the total number of public APIs to understand documentation coverage rg "public (class|struct|protocol|enum|func|var)" --type swift | wc -l # And number of documented public APIs rg "///.*\n.*public|/\*\*.*\n.*public" --type swift | wc -lLength of output: 6331
docs/docsets/Mixpanel.docset/Contents/Resources/Documents/Extensions/NSArray.html (1)
20-20: 💡 Codebase verification
Documentation coverage decrease is justified by new proxy server functionality
The decrease in documentation coverage from 83% to 80% is due to the addition of new proxy server functionality, which includes:
- New protocol
MixpanelProxyServerDelegate- New struct
ServerProxyResourcewith public properties- New struct
ProxyServerConfigThese new additions appear to be the primary undocumented public APIs, which explains the coverage drop. The core functionality remains well-documented.
🔗 Analysis chain
Documentation coverage has decreased to 80%
The documentation coverage has dropped from 83% to 80%, which might indicate that some of the new proxy server functionality lacks proper documentation.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Find undocumented public APIs in the codebase # Look for public declarations without documentation comments # Search for public declarations in Swift files rg "public (class|struct|protocol|enum|func|var|let)" -A 3 | grep -v "///" | grep -v "/\*"Length of output: 15988
docs/docsets/Mixpanel.docset/Contents/Resources/Documents/Extensions/NSNull.html (1)
120-130: 💡 Codebase verification
Documentation missing for proxy server structures
Both
ProxyServerConfigandServerProxyResourcestructures and their members are marked as "Undocumented" in the codebase. The following items need documentation:
ProxyServerConfigstruct and its initializerinit(serverUrl:delegate:)ServerProxyResourcestruct and its members:
init(queryItems:headers:)queryItemspropertyheadersproperty🔗 Analysis chain
Verify documentation for new proxy server structures.
New structures
ProxyServerConfigandServerProxyResourcehave been added. Please ensure:
- Both structures are fully documented with proper examples
- Their relationship with
MixpanelProxyServerDelegateis clearly explained🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check documentation completeness for new structures # Look for structure documentation files fd "ProxyServerConfig.html|ServerProxyResource.html" --type f # Check for usage examples rg -A 5 "ProxyServerConfig|ServerProxyResource"Length of output: 131185
docs/Extensions/URL.html (1)
112-114: 💡 Codebase verification
Documentation is missing for proxy server components
The undocumented.json reveals that several proxy server components lack proper documentation:
ProxyServerConfigstruct and its initializerServerProxyResourcestruct, its initializer, and properties (queryItems, headers)🔗 Analysis chain
Verify proxy server functionality documentation.
New proxy server-related additions (
MixpanelProxyServerDelegate,ProxyServerConfig,ServerProxyResource) have been properly added to the navigation. However, ensure that these new components are thoroughly documented in their respective files.Also applies to: 120-130
Let me check the actual content of these documentation files to verify if they are properly documented.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if the new proxy server components have documentation files echo "Checking for proxy server documentation files..." fd -e html "MixpanelProxyServerDelegate|ProxyServerConfig|ServerProxyResource" docs/ # Check documentation content for these components echo "Checking documentation content..." rg -l "MixpanelProxyServerDelegate|ProxyServerConfig|ServerProxyResource" docs/Length of output: 4125
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the content of proxy server documentation files echo "=== MixpanelProxyServerDelegate Documentation ===" rg -A 5 "protocol MixpanelProxyServerDelegate" docs/Protocols/MixpanelProxyServerDelegate.html echo -e "\n=== ProxyServerConfig Documentation ===" rg -A 5 "struct ProxyServerConfig" docs/Structs/ProxyServerConfig.html echo -e "\n=== ServerProxyResource Documentation ===" rg -A 5 "struct ServerProxyResource" docs/Structs/ServerProxyResource.html # Check for undocumented symbols echo -e "\n=== Checking undocumented.json for any proxy-related missing docs ===" rg "MixpanelProxyServerDelegate|ProxyServerConfig|ServerProxyResource" docs/undocumented.jsonLength of output: 1101
docs/docsets/Mixpanel.docset/Contents/Resources/Documents/Extensions/URL.html (1)
20-20: 💡 Codebase verification
Based on the output, I can now generate the final response:
Documentation coverage decrease is due to newly added proxy server functionality
The documentation coverage drop from 83% to 80% appears to be primarily due to the newly added proxy server-related code. Specifically:
- New
ServerProxyResourcestruct in Network.swift has some undocumented public properties- New
ProxyServerConfigstruct in MixpanelInstance.swift has minimal documentation- New
MixpanelProxyServerDelegateprotocol appears to have documentation but its methods may need more detailed documentationThe rest of the public APIs in the codebase appear to be well-documented, as evidenced by the presence of documentation comments (indicated by
*/before public declarations) for most public methods in MixpanelInstance.swift and other core files.🔗 Analysis chain
Documentation coverage has decreased.
The documentation coverage has dropped from 83% to 80%. This decrease might be related to the newly added proxy server functionality.
Let's verify which parts of the codebase are missing documentation:
This script will help us:
- Find all Swift files
- For each file, show public declarations along with their preceding lines
- This will help us identify which public APIs might be missing documentation comments
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find undocumented public APIs in Swift files # Look for public declarations without documentation comments # Search for public declarations rg "^[[:space:]]*public" -A 1 | grep -v "///" | grep -v "/*"Length of output: 60
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's try a different approach to find public APIs and their documentation status # First, let's find all Swift files fd -e swift -x sh -c ' echo "=== File: {} ===" # Extract public declarations and their preceding lines awk "/public/ { if (NR>1) {print prev} print \$0; } { prev=\$0; }" "{}" 'Length of output: 7808
docs/Extensions/Date.html (1)
20-20: 💡 Codebase verification
Based on the search results, I can now provide a definitive response about the documentation coverage decrease:
Documentation missing for new proxy server functionality
The documentation coverage decrease is due to undocumented proxy server components:
ProxyServerConfigstruct and its initializerServerProxyResourcestruct and its properties (queryItems, headers)While the
MixpanelProxyServerDelegateprotocol is documented, the supporting structures lack documentation, which should be added to restore coverage.🔗 Analysis chain
Documentation coverage has decreased to 80%
The documentation coverage has dropped from 83% to 80%. This decrease might be related to the newly added proxy server functionality.
Let's check which new additions might be missing documentation:
Would you like help documenting the new proxy server functionality to improve the coverage?
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for undocumented proxy server related code rg -l "MixpanelProxyServerDelegate|ProxyServerConfig|ServerProxyResource" | \ xargs rg -l "TODO|FIXME|XXX|undocumented"Length of output: 142
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the undocumented.json file to see which proxy-related items are missing documentation cat docs/undocumented.json | jq -r '.[] | select(.file | contains("Proxy"))'Length of output: 144
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's also check the actual implementation files for proxy-related code rg -A 5 "MixpanelProxyServerDelegate|ProxyServerConfig|ServerProxyResource"Length of output: 131149
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if there are any documentation comments in the implementation ast-grep --pattern 'protocol MixpanelProxyServerDelegate { $$$ }' ast-grep --pattern 'struct ProxyServerConfig { $$$ }' ast-grep --pattern 'struct ServerProxyResource { $$$ }'Length of output: 187
docs/Extensions/NSNumber.html (1)
112-114: 💡 Codebase verification
Documentation is incomplete for proxy server components
The documentation files exist but are missing critical documentation:
MixpanelProxyServerDelegate: Has basic protocol description but method parameter documentation is incompleteProxyServerConfig: Marked as "Undocumented" with no description of its purpose or propertiesServerProxyResource: All properties and initializer are marked as "Undocumented"Please add comprehensive documentation for:
- Purpose and usage of
ProxyServerConfigstruct- All properties and initializer parameters of
ServerProxyResource- Parameter and return value descriptions for
mixpanelResourceForProxyServermethod🔗 Analysis chain
Verify documentation completeness for new proxy server components
New proxy server-related components have been added to the navigation:
- Protocol: MixpanelProxyServerDelegate
- Structures: ProxyServerConfig, ServerProxyResource
Please ensure that comprehensive documentation exists for these new components.
Also applies to: 120-130
Let me verify the content of these documentation files to ensure they are comprehensive.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if documentation files exist for new components echo "Checking documentation files..." fd -e html -e md "MixpanelProxyServerDelegate|ProxyServerConfig|ServerProxyResource"Length of output: 562
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check content of documentation files for new components echo "=== MixpanelProxyServerDelegate Documentation ===" cat docs/Protocols/MixpanelProxyServerDelegate.html | grep -A 20 '<section class="section">' echo -e "\n=== ProxyServerConfig Documentation ===" cat docs/Structs/ProxyServerConfig.html | grep -A 20 '<section class="section">' echo -e "\n=== ServerProxyResource Documentation ===" cat docs/Structs/ServerProxyResource.html | grep -A 20 '<section class="section">'Length of output: 9589
docs/Extensions/NSString.html (2)
20-20: 💡 Codebase verification
Documentation needed for new proxy server features
The drop in documentation coverage (83% to 80%) is due to newly added proxy server-related APIs that lack documentation comments. Specifically:
ServerProxyResourcestruct in Network.swift:
- Undocumented public struct and its properties
- Missing docs for
queryItemsandheadersproperties- Missing docs for initializer
ProxyServerConfigstruct in MixpanelInstance.swift:
- Undocumented public struct and its properties
- Missing docs for initializer
MixpanelProxyServerDelegateprotocol in MixpanelInstance.swift:
- Protocol declaration lacks documentation
Please add documentation comments for these new proxy server-related APIs to improve the documentation coverage.
🔗 Analysis chain
Documentation coverage has decreased.
The documentation coverage has dropped from 83% to 80%, which might indicate newly added features or changes that lack proper documentation.
Let's check which new additions might be missing documentation:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find undocumented public APIs in the codebase # Look for public declarations without documentation comments # Search for public protocols, structs, and their members rg "public (protocol|struct|class|enum|func|var)" -A 3 | rg -v "///" -v "/*"Length of output: 119
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's try a different approach to find undocumented public APIs # First, let's find Swift source files and then look for public declarations fd ".swift$" | xargs rg "^[[:space:]]*public" -B 1 | grep -v "///"Length of output: 8176
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's also check the proxy server related files specifically # since they are mentioned in the changes rg -l "ProxyServer|ServerProxy" --type swiftLength of output: 122
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's verify the version number across documentation files # to ensure consistency rg "Mixpanel 4\.2\.7" --type htmlLength of output: 8059
112-114: 💡 Codebase verification
Documentation needs improvement for proxy server components
The documentation is incomplete and needs enhancement:
- MixpanelProxyServerDelegate: Has method declaration but lacks protocol-level documentation explaining its purpose
- ProxyServerConfig: Missing documentation for the struct and its properties
- ServerProxyResource: Only has declarations documented, missing explanations for struct purpose and property usage
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify proxy server documentation completeness.
New proxy server-related additions (MixpanelProxyServerDelegate protocol, ProxyServerConfig and ServerProxyResource structures) have been added to the navigation. Let's ensure their documentation is complete.
Also applies to: 120-130
Let me check the actual documentation content to verify its completeness.
Let me check the actual documentation content beyond the navigation sections to verify the completeness of the documentation.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check documentation completeness for proxy server components # Check for documentation files fd -e html "MixpanelProxyServerDelegate|ProxyServerConfig|ServerProxyResource" docs/ # Check implementation files for documentation comments rg -A 5 "MixpanelProxyServerDelegate|ProxyServerConfig|ServerProxyResource" | rg "///"Length of output: 1227
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check content of documentation files echo "=== MixpanelProxyServerDelegate Documentation ===" cat docs/Protocols/MixpanelProxyServerDelegate.html | grep -A 20 '<div class="content-wrapper">' echo -e "\n=== ProxyServerConfig Documentation ===" cat docs/Structs/ProxyServerConfig.html | grep -A 20 '<div class="content-wrapper">' echo -e "\n=== ServerProxyResource Documentation ===" cat docs/Structs/ServerProxyResource.html | grep -A 20 '<div class="content-wrapper">'Length of output: 5208
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check actual documentation content echo "=== MixpanelProxyServerDelegate Documentation ===" rg -A 10 "Discussion|Declaration" docs/Protocols/MixpanelProxyServerDelegate.html echo -e "\n=== ProxyServerConfig Documentation ===" rg -A 10 "Discussion|Declaration" docs/Structs/ProxyServerConfig.html echo -e "\n=== ServerProxyResource Documentation ===" rg -A 10 "Discussion|Declaration" docs/Structs/ServerProxyResource.html # Also check source files for documentation comments echo -e "\n=== Source Documentation ===" rg -A 10 "protocol MixpanelProxyServerDelegate|struct ProxyServerConfig|struct ServerProxyResource" --type swiftLength of output: 6733
docs/docsets/Mixpanel.docset/Contents/Resources/Documents/Extensions/NSNumber.html (1)
20-20: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Documentation coverage needs attention.
The documentation coverage has decreased from 83% to 80%, and there are undocumented methods (e.g., the
equalsmethod). Consider:
- Adding documentation for undocumented methods
- Running documentation coverage reports to identify other gaps
Would you like me to help generate documentation for the undocumented methods or create a GitHub issue to track this task?
Also applies to: 217-217
docs/Protocols/MixpanelType.html (2)
112-114: 💡 Codebase verification
Documentation needs improvement for proxy server functionality
The proxy server functionality lacks comprehensive documentation:
- The
MixpanelProxyServerDelegateprotocol has minimal documentation, only describing its basic purposeServerProxyResourceandProxyServerConfigstructs are completely undocumented- No usage examples or implementation guidelines are provided
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify documentation for new proxy server delegate.
The addition of
MixpanelProxyServerDelegateto the navigation suggests new proxy server functionality. Ensure that this new protocol is well-documented with proper usage examples and implementation guidelines.
Let me gather more information about the documentation of the proxy server functionality.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check documentation completeness for proxy server functionality # Check for documentation and examples of the new protocol rg -U "protocol MixpanelProxyServerDelegate" -A 10 # Look for usage examples rg -l "MixpanelProxyServerDelegate" docs/Length of output: 4181
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the content of the protocol documentation cat docs/Protocols/MixpanelProxyServerDelegate.html # Check for any implementation examples or related documentation cat docs/Structs/ServerProxyResource.html cat docs/Structs/ProxyServerConfig.htmlLength of output: 29995
120-130: 💡 Codebase verification
Documentation is incomplete for the proxy server feature structures
Both
ProxyServerConfigandServerProxyResourcestructures are marked as "Undocumented" in the generated documentation, though their properties and methods are defined. Only theMixpanelProxyServerDelegateprotocol has proper documentation explaining its purpose.
ProxyServerConfig: Missing documentation for the structure and its initializerServerProxyResource: Missing documentation for the structure, its properties (queryItems,headers), and initializer- The relationship between these structures and their role in the proxy server feature is not explained
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify documentation for new structures.
New structures
ProxyServerConfigandServerProxyResourcehave been added to the documentation. These appear to be part of the proxy server feature set.
Let me gather more information about the documentation of these structures.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify documentation completeness for new structures # Check documentation for both new structures rg -U "struct (ProxyServerConfig|ServerProxyResource)" -A 10 # Look for usage examples and integration documentation rg -l "(ProxyServerConfig|ServerProxyResource)" docs/Length of output: 4945
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the actual documentation content for both structures cat docs/Structs/ProxyServerConfig.html docs/Structs/ServerProxyResource.html # Check for any usage examples in the main documentation cat docs/index.html | rg -A 10 -B 10 "(ProxyServerConfig|ServerProxyResource)" # Check the protocol documentation that might contain integration details cat docs/Protocols/MixpanelProxyServerDelegate.htmlLength of output: 31005
docs/docsets/Mixpanel.docset/Contents/Resources/Documents/Protocols/MixpanelType.html (3)
219-219:
⚠️ Potential issueFix incorrect documentation generation date.
The last updated date (2024-05-03) appears to be set in the future. This could cause confusion about when these changes were actually made.
Please regenerate the documentation with the correct timestamp or verify the system time during documentation generation.
20-20: 💡 Codebase verification
⚠️ Potential issueVersion mismatch detected between documentation and podspec
The documentation shows version 4.2.7 while the podspec defines version 4.3.0. This inconsistency needs to be addressed:
- docs/index.html and related doc files show version 4.2.7 with 80% coverage
- Mixpanel.podspec defines version as 4.3.0
The documentation needs to be regenerated with the correct version number (4.3.0) to maintain consistency across the codebase.
🔗 Analysis chain
Version inconsistency detected and documentation coverage decreased.
There are two concerns:
- The version number (4.2.7) differs from what's mentioned in the AI summary (4.3.0)
- Documentation coverage has dropped from 83% to 80%, which might indicate missing documentation for new features like the proxy server functionality.
Please ensure:
- Version numbers are consistent across all files
- New features (ProxyServerConfig, ServerProxyResource, MixpanelProxyServerDelegate) are properly documented to maintain coverage
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check version number consistency across documentation files fd -e html -e md -e json . | xargs rg -l "4\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+"Length of output: 13022
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check version numbers in CHANGELOG.md and package files echo "=== Checking CHANGELOG.md ===" rg "^##\s+\[?4\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\]?" CHANGELOG.md echo -e "\n=== Checking version in index.html ===" rg "Mixpanel\s+4\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+" docs/index.html echo -e "\n=== Checking version in podspec ===" fd -e podspec . | xargs rg "version\s*=\s*['\"]4\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+['\"]"Length of output: 526
112-114: 💡 Codebase verification
Documentation is incomplete for new proxy server features
The documentation structure is in place, but there are missing descriptions:
ProxyServerConfigis marked as "Undocumented"ServerProxyResourceis marked as "Undocumented"- Only
MixpanelProxyServerDelegatehas a basic description but lacks detailed documentation for its method parameters and return value🔗 Analysis chain
Verify documentation completeness for new proxy server features.
The navigation structure has been updated with new proxy server related items:
- Protocol: MixpanelProxyServerDelegate
- Structures: ProxyServerConfig, ServerProxyResource
Also applies to: 120-130
Let me verify the content of these documentation files to ensure completeness.
Let me try a different approach to check the documentation content.
Let me check the actual documentation content by searching for method and property descriptions.
Let me try one final check to verify the documentation completeness.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if the new proxy server features have complete documentation rg -l "MixpanelProxyServerDelegate|ProxyServerConfig|ServerProxyResource" --type htmlLength of output: 3347
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the content of proxy server related documentation echo "=== MixpanelProxyServerDelegate Protocol ===" rg -A 5 "protocol MixpanelProxyServerDelegate" docs/Protocols/MixpanelProxyServerDelegate.html echo -e "\n=== ProxyServerConfig Structure ===" rg -A 5 "struct ProxyServerConfig" docs/Structs/ProxyServerConfig.html echo -e "\n=== ServerProxyResource Structure ===" rg -A 5 "struct ServerProxyResource" docs/Structs/ServerProxyResource.htmlLength of output: 523
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if the documentation files exist and have content echo "=== MixpanelProxyServerDelegate Protocol ===" cat docs/Protocols/MixpanelProxyServerDelegate.html | grep -A 10 "<title>" echo -e "\n=== ProxyServerConfig Structure ===" cat docs/Structs/ProxyServerConfig.html | grep -A 10 "<title>" echo -e "\n=== ServerProxyResource Structure ===" cat docs/Structs/ServerProxyResource.html | grep -A 10 "<title>"Length of output: 2038
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for documentation content of methods and properties echo "=== MixpanelProxyServerDelegate Methods ===" rg -B 2 -A 5 "func.*" docs/Protocols/MixpanelProxyServerDelegate.html echo -e "\n=== ProxyServerConfig Properties ===" rg -B 2 -A 5 "var.*" docs/Structs/ProxyServerConfig.html echo -e "\n=== ServerProxyResource Properties ===" rg -B 2 -A 5 "var.*" docs/Structs/ServerProxyResource.htmlLength of output: 1170
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for documentation descriptions and content echo "=== MixpanelProxyServerDelegate Description ===" rg -B 2 -A 10 '<h1>.*MixpanelProxyServerDelegate.*</h1>' docs/Protocols/MixpanelProxyServerDelegate.html echo -e "\n=== ProxyServerConfig Description ===" rg -B 2 -A 10 '<h1>.*ProxyServerConfig.*</h1>' docs/Structs/ProxyServerConfig.html echo -e "\n=== ServerProxyResource Description ===" rg -B 2 -A 10 '<h1>.*ServerProxyResource.*</h1>' docs/Structs/ServerProxyResource.htmlLength of output: 2101
docs/docsets/Mixpanel.docset/Contents/Resources/Documents/Structs.html (1)
164-164: 💡 Codebase verification
⚠️ Potential issueDocumentation missing for proxy server related structures
The review comment is correct. Both
ProxyServerConfigandServerProxyResourcestructures lack proper documentation comments in their source files. These public structures should have documentation comments explaining:
- Their purpose and use cases
- Description of their properties
- Any important usage considerations
Locations needing documentation:
Sources/MixpanelInstance.swift:ProxyServerConfigstructSources/Network.swift:ServerProxyResourcestruct🔗 Analysis chain
Documentation missing for new structures.
Both
ProxyServerConfigandServerProxyResourcestructures are marked as "Undocumented". Since these are new public structures related to proxy server configuration, they should be properly documented to help users understand their purpose and usage.Let's verify if documentation exists in the source files:
Also applies to: 192-192
Let me try a different approach to locate these structures and their documentation using ripgrep, which might be more effective in this case.
Let me check the complete documentation context for these structs by looking at the lines above them.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for documentation comments in source files # Expected: Should find documentation comments for these structures echo "Checking for structure documentation..." # Search for structure definitions and their documentation ast-grep --pattern 'struct ProxyServerConfig { $$$ }' ast-grep --pattern 'struct ServerProxyResource { $$$ }'Length of output: 206
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the struct definitions and surrounding context echo "Searching for ProxyServerConfig..." rg "struct ProxyServerConfig" -B 5 -A 5 echo -e "\nSearching for ServerProxyResource..." rg "struct ServerProxyResource" -B 5 -A 5 # Also search in Swift files specifically echo -e "\nSearching in Swift files..." fd -e swift -x rg -l "struct (ProxyServerConfig|ServerProxyResource)"Length of output: 1837
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Get more context above the struct definitions to check for documentation comments echo "Checking ProxyServerConfig documentation..." rg "struct ProxyServerConfig" -B 15 Sources/MixpanelInstance.swift echo -e "\nChecking ServerProxyResource documentation..." rg "struct ServerProxyResource" -B 15 Sources/Network.swiftLength of output: 1096
docs/Protocols.html (1)
120-130: 💡 Codebase verification
Documentation needs improvement for both structures
The structures lack proper documentation comments explaining their purpose and usage:
ProxyServerConfiginSources/MixpanelInstance.swift:
- Only has inline documentation in the initializer
- Missing documentation for the struct itself and its properties
- The purpose and configuration options should be clearly documented
ServerProxyResourceinSources/Network.swift:
- No documentation for the struct or its properties
- Properties
queryItemsandheadersneed documentation explaining their purpose- Usage examples would be helpful for implementers
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify documentation for new structures
Please ensure that the newly added structures
ProxyServerConfigandServerProxyResourcehave comprehensive documentation in their respective files.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check documentation for the new structs # Search for the struct declarations and their documentation ast-grep --pattern 'public struct ProxyServerConfig { $$$ }' -A 5 ast-grep --pattern 'public struct ServerProxyResource { $$$ }' -A 5Length of output: 141
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's try a different approach using ripgrep to find these structs # and their documentation comments # Search for ProxyServerConfig rg -B 5 "struct ProxyServerConfig" --type swift # Search for ServerProxyResource rg -B 5 "struct ServerProxyResource" --type swift # Also search in case they are defined with different access modifiers rg -B 5 "ServerProxyResource" --type swift rg -B 5 "ProxyServerConfig" --type swiftLength of output: 3917
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the actual implementation and documentation of these structs # by getting more context around their definitions # Get full context for ProxyServerConfig rg -A 10 -B 10 "^public struct ProxyServerConfig" --type swift # Get full context for ServerProxyResource rg -A 10 -B 10 "^public struct ServerProxyResource" --type swiftLength of output: 2506
docs/docsets/Mixpanel.docset/Contents/Resources/Documents/Protocols.html (1)
151-178: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Protocol documentation needs improvement.
While the protocol is properly declared, the documentation could be more detailed:
- The description "Delegate protocol for updating the Proxy Server API's network behavior" is quite brief
- Missing documentation about:
- When this delegate is called
- Example usage
- Relationship with
ProxyServerConfigandServerProxyResourceConsider enhancing the documentation with more details:
- <p>Delegate protocol for updating the Proxy Server API's network behavior.</p> + <p>Delegate protocol for customizing the Proxy Server API's network behavior. This protocol works in conjunction with + <code>ProxyServerConfig</code> to enable custom proxy server configurations.</p> + <p>Implement this delegate to:</p> + <ul> + <li>Modify API requests before they are sent to the proxy server</li> + <li>Add custom headers or query parameters</li> + <li>Control how the SDK interacts with your proxy server</li> + </ul> + <p>Example usage:</p> + <pre class="highlight swift"><code> +class MyProxyDelegate: MixpanelProxyServerDelegate { + func mixpanelResourceForProxyServer(_ mixpanel: MixpanelInstance) -> ServerProxyResource { + // Customize proxy server behavior + return ServerProxyResource(queryItems: [...], headers: [...]) + } +} + </code></pre>Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
docs/Classes.html (3)
20-20: 💡 Codebase verification
Documentation needs to be regenerated with the correct version number
The version number inconsistency is confirmed. The current version is 4.3.0 as shown in:
- Info.plist:
4.3.0- Mixpanel-swift.podspec:
4.3.0- Sources/AutomaticProperties.swift:
4.3.0- scripts/generate_docs.sh:
4.3.0However, all documentation files still show version 4.2.7. The documentation needs to be regenerated using the script at
scripts/generate_docs.shwhich already has the correct version number.🔗 Analysis chain
Version number inconsistency with PR summary.
The AI summary mentions version
4.3.0, but the documentation shows4.2.7. This inconsistency needs to be resolved.Also applies to: 270-270
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check version number consistency across files # Look for version numbers in various file types echo "Checking version numbers in files..." rg -g "!node_modules" -g "!.git" "4\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+" # Check package/podspec files specifically for f in "*.podspec" "package.swift" "setup.py"; do if [ -f "$f" ]; then echo -e "\nVersion in $f:" cat "$f" | rg "version" fi doneLength of output: 10546
20-20: 💡 Codebase verification
Documentation coverage decrease requires attention
The decrease in documentation coverage (83% to 80%) is due to newly added public APIs that lack documentation, particularly in the proxy server feature:
MixpanelProxyServerDelegateprotocol and its methodsProxyServerConfigstruct and its propertiesServerProxyResourcestruct and its propertiesPlease add documentation comments for these new public APIs to maintain the project's documentation standards.
🔗 Analysis chain
Documentation coverage has decreased.
The documentation coverage has dropped from 83% to 80%. This decrease might be related to the newly added proxy server features.
Let's verify which parts of the codebase are missing documentation:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find undocumented public APIs in Swift files # Look for public/open declarations without documentation comments rg "^[[:space:]]*(public|open)[[:space:]]+(class|struct|protocol|enum|func|var|let)[[:space:]]+" --type swift -B 1 | \ rg -v "///" -v "/\*" --multilineLength of output: 193
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's try a different approach to find Swift files and check their documentation # First, find all Swift files fd "\.swift$" | while read -r file; do echo "=== $file ===" # Look for public declarations without preceding documentation comments awk ' /^[[:space:]]*\/\/\// { doc=1; next } /^[[:space:]]*public|open/ { if (!doc) print NR ":" $0 doc=0 next } { doc=0 } ' "$file" doneLength of output: 27401
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Also check the version number consistency across the codebase echo "=== Version references ===" rg "4\.2\.7|4\.1\.4" --type-add 'pod:*.podspec' --type pod --type swift --type htmlLength of output: 8172
112-114: 💡 Codebase verification
Documentation is incomplete for proxy server components
The documentation files exist but have significant gaps:
ProxyServerConfigis marked as "Undocumented"ServerProxyResourceis marked as "Undocumented"- Only
MixpanelProxyServerDelegatehas a basic description but lacks detailed usage examples- Method parameters and return values need documentation
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify the completeness of proxy server feature documentation.
The navigation structure has been updated to include new proxy server-related components:
- New protocol:
MixpanelProxyServerDelegate- New structures:
ProxyServerConfigandServerProxyResourceLet's ensure these components are properly documented.
Also applies to: 120-130
Let me verify the content of these documentation files to ensure they are properly documented.
Let me check for the presence of detailed descriptions and examples in these documentation files.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify documentation exists for new proxy server components # Check if documentation files exist echo "Checking documentation files..." for doc in "Protocols/MixpanelProxyServerDelegate.html" "Structs/ProxyServerConfig.html" "Structs/ServerProxyResource.html"; do if [ -f "docs/$doc" ]; then echo "✓ Found: $doc" else echo "✗ Missing: $doc" fi done # Search for usage examples in documentation echo -e "\nChecking for usage examples..." rg -l "ProxyServerConfig|ServerProxyResource|MixpanelProxyServerDelegate" docs/*.htmlLength of output: 1289
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the content of documentation files for completeness echo "=== Checking MixpanelProxyServerDelegate documentation ===" rg -A 5 "Discussion|Declaration" docs/Protocols/MixpanelProxyServerDelegate.html echo -e "\n=== Checking ProxyServerConfig documentation ===" rg -A 5 "Discussion|Declaration" docs/Structs/ProxyServerConfig.html echo -e "\n=== Checking ServerProxyResource documentation ===" rg -A 5 "Discussion|Declaration" docs/Structs/ServerProxyResource.html # Check for method documentation echo -e "\n=== Checking method documentation ===" rg -A 3 "func.*" docs/Protocols/MixpanelProxyServerDelegate.htmlLength of output: 4357
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for documentation completeness echo "=== Checking MixpanelProxyServerDelegate documentation completeness ===" rg -B 2 -A 10 "<h3>.*Discussion" docs/Protocols/MixpanelProxyServerDelegate.html echo -e "\n=== Checking ProxyServerConfig documentation completeness ===" rg -B 2 -A 10 "<h3>.*Discussion" docs/Structs/ProxyServerConfig.html echo -e "\n=== Checking ServerProxyResource documentation completeness ===" rg -B 2 -A 10 "<h3>.*Discussion" docs/Structs/ServerProxyResource.html # Check for examples echo -e "\n=== Checking for code examples ===" rg "<pre class=\"highlight swift\">" -B 1 -A 6 docs/Protocols/MixpanelProxyServerDelegate.html docs/Structs/ProxyServerConfig.html docs/Structs/ServerProxyResource.htmlLength of output: 7703
docs/docsets/Mixpanel.docset/Contents/Resources/Documents/Classes.html (1)
20-20: 💡 Codebase verification
Documentation coverage decrease is primarily due to new proxy server features
Based on the search results, the documentation coverage drop appears to be mainly due to the newly added proxy server-related components that lack proper documentation:
ServerProxyResourcestruct and its properties lack documentation commentsProxyServerConfigstruct lacks documentationMixpanelProxyServerDelegateprotocol lacks detailed documentation for its methods🔗 Analysis chain
Documentation coverage has decreased to 80%
The documentation coverage has dropped from 83% to 80%. This decrease suggests that some of the new features (proxy server configuration, etc.) might not be fully documented.
Let's identify the undocumented components:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find undocumented public APIs by searching for documentation comments # Note: This is a basic check and might need refinement based on the actual codebase structure # Search for public declarations without documentation comments rg -B 1 "^(\s)*(open|public)" | rg -v "///" -B 1Length of output: 18164
docs/docsets/Mixpanel.docset/Contents/Resources/Documents/index.html (1)
224-224: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Document the impact of disabling automatic event tracking.
The initialization example now sets
trackAutomaticEventstofalseby default, which is a significant change in behavior. Consider adding:
- A note explaining why automatic event tracking is now disabled by default
- Documentation about which automatic events will no longer be tracked
- Instructions for users who want to maintain the previous behavior
Also applies to: 255-255
docs/index.html (1)
111-113: 💡 Codebase verification
Based on the shell script results, I can now generate the final response:
Documentation for proxy server components is incomplete
The proxy server components have been added but lack proper documentation:
ProxyServerConfigstruct is marked as "Undocumented"ServerProxyResourcestruct is marked as "Undocumented"- Only
MixpanelProxyServerDelegateprotocol has basic documentation describing its purpose🔗 Analysis chain
Verify documentation for new proxy server components.
The navigation structure has been updated to include new proxy server related components:
- Protocol:
MixpanelProxyServerDelegate- Structures:
ProxyServerConfigandServerProxyResourceThese additions align with the AI summary mentioning proxy server configuration support.
Also applies to: 119-129
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the existence and documentation of new components # Check for proxy server delegate protocol rg -A 5 "protocol.*MixpanelProxyServerDelegate" # Check for proxy server related structs rg -A 5 "struct.*(ProxyServerConfig|ServerProxyResource)"Length of output: 63169
docs/docsets/Mixpanel.docset/Contents/Resources/Documents/Classes/Group.html (2)
20-20: 💡 Codebase verification
⚠️ Potential issueDocumentation needs regeneration with correct version
The version inconsistency is confirmed. The source code (podspec, Info.plist, AutomaticProperties.swift) shows version 4.3.0, but the documentation files show version 4.2.7. This is because the documentation hasn't been regenerated after the version bump. Looking at
scripts/generate_docs.sh, it's already configured to use version 4.3.0, but needs to be re-run.
- All source files and package metadata use version 4.3.0
- All documentation files still show version 4.2.7
- Documentation generation script is correctly set to version 4.3.0
🔗 Analysis chain
Version number inconsistency detected
The version number in this file (4.2.7) doesn't match the version mentioned in the PR summary (4.3.0). This inconsistency should be resolved to maintain version coherence across the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for version number consistency across files # Look for version numbers in various file types rg -g '!.git' -g '!node_modules' '4\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+'Length of output: 10239
20-20: 💡 Codebase verification
Documentation needs improvement for proxy server related code
The verification shows that while
MixpanelProxyServerDelegateis properly documented, bothProxyServerConfigandServerProxyResourcestructs lack proper documentation comments explaining their purpose and usage. This confirms the decrease in documentation coverage.
Sources/MixpanelInstance.swift: Add documentation forProxyServerConfigstructSources/Network.swift: Add documentation forServerProxyResourcestruct and its properties🔗 Analysis chain
Documentation coverage has decreased
The documentation coverage has decreased from 83% to 80%. This might indicate that some of the new functionality (proxy server related) is not fully documented.
Let me check if these proxy-related additions are properly documented by examining their documentation comments.
Let me check the actual documentation coverage by looking at the previous version of the documentation.
Let me try a different approach to verify the documentation coverage.
Let me check specifically for the documentation of the new proxy-related code.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find newly added code that might be missing documentation # Look for new proxy server related code without documentation comments rg -g '*.swift' '(class|struct|protocol|func).*(?:Proxy|Server).*\{' -B 2Length of output: 546
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the documentation comments for proxy-related code rg -g '*.swift' -B 5 '(class|struct|protocol|func).*(?:Proxy|Server).*\{'Length of output: 1022
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check git history for the previous documentation coverage git log -p -- 'docs/docsets/Mixpanel.docset/Contents/Resources/Documents/Classes/Group.html' | grep -B 1 "documented"Length of output: 0
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Find all Swift files and check their documentation status fd -e swift -x cat {} | grep -c "///" || true # Count total number of public declarations that should be documented rg -g "*.swift" "^[[:space:]]*(public|open)" --count || trueLength of output: 331
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check documentation for proxy-related code echo "=== ProxyServerDelegate Documentation ===" rg -g "*.swift" -B 3 -A 3 "protocol MixpanelProxyServerDelegate" echo -e "\n=== ProxyServerConfig Documentation ===" rg -g "*.swift" -B 3 -A 3 "struct ProxyServerConfig" echo -e "\n=== ServerProxyResource Documentation ===" rg -g "*.swift" -B 3 -A 3 "struct ServerProxyResource"Length of output: 1793
docs/Extensions.html (1)
20-20: 💡 Codebase verification
Documentation needed for new proxy server features
The verification shows that the following new features lack documentation:
ProxyServerConfigstruct and its initializerServerProxyResourcestruct and all its members (queryItems, headers)- Only
MixpanelProxyServerDelegateprotocol is documented with a description of its purpose and methodPlease add documentation for:
- Purpose and usage of
ProxyServerConfigstruct- Purpose and usage of
ServerProxyResourcestruct- Parameters and usage of
ProxyServerConfig.init(serverUrl:delegate:)- Purpose and usage of
ServerProxyResource.queryItemsproperty- Purpose and usage of
ServerProxyResource.headersproperty🔗 Analysis chain
Verify documentation coverage for new features.
The documentation completeness has decreased from 83% to 80%. This might indicate that the newly added features (
MixpanelProxyServerDelegate,ProxyServerConfig,ServerProxyResource) need additional documentation.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check documentation coverage for new features # Search for documentation of new features echo "Checking documentation for new protocol and structures..." rg -A 5 "MixpanelProxyServerDelegate|ProxyServerConfig|ServerProxyResource" docs/Length of output: 131222
docs/docsets/Mixpanel.docset/Contents/Resources/Documents/Extensions.html (2)
112-114: 💡 Codebase verification
Documentation has minor inconsistencies in parameter description
The protocol documentation exists and is mostly complete, but there's a minor inconsistency in the parameter description. The documentation describes the parameter as
mixpanelbut the actual parameter name in the method signature isname. This should be corrected for accuracy.
mixpanelResourceForProxyServer(_:)method is documented with its purpose, parameters, and return value- Parameter description needs to be updated to match the actual parameter name
nameinstead ofmixpanel🔗 Analysis chain
Verify protocol documentation completeness
The new
MixpanelProxyServerDelegateprotocol has been added to the documentation navigation. Ensure that all protocol methods and requirements are fully documented in the corresponding protocol page.Let's verify the protocol documentation:
Let me gather more information about the protocol documentation content:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if the protocol documentation exists and is complete # Look for the protocol documentation file and its contents # Check if the protocol documentation file exists fd "MixpanelProxyServerDelegate.html" docs/ # If found, check for documentation completeness rg -A 5 "Requirements" docs/docsets/Mixpanel.docset/Contents/Resources/Documents/Protocols/MixpanelProxyServerDelegate.html || echo "Requirements section not found"Length of output: 387
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the actual content of the protocol documentation cat docs/docsets/Mixpanel.docset/Contents/Resources/Documents/Protocols/MixpanelProxyServerDelegate.html # Also check the source code to compare with documentation rg -A 5 "protocol MixpanelProxyServerDelegate"Length of output: 10293
120-130: 💡 Codebase verification
Documentation is incomplete for proxy server structures
The documentation for both
ProxyServerConfigandServerProxyResourcestructures exists but is marked as "Undocumented" throughout. Specifically:
ProxyServerConfig: Missing documentation for the structure and its initializer withserverUrlanddelegateparametersServerProxyResource: Missing documentation for:
- Structure overview
- Initializer with
queryItemsandheadersparametersqueryItemspropertyheadersproperty🔗 Analysis chain
Verify structure documentation completeness
A new "Structures" section has been added with
ProxyServerConfigandServerProxyResource. This is a significant addition for proxy server configuration support.Let's verify the structure documentation:
Let me gather more information about the actual structure definitions to verify the documentation completeness.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if the structure documentation exists and is complete # Look for the structure documentation files and their contents # Check if the structure documentation files exist fd "ProxyServerConfig.html|ServerProxyResource.html" docs/ # If found, check for property and method documentation for file in $(fd "ProxyServerConfig.html|ServerProxyResource.html" docs/); do echo "Checking $file..." rg -A 5 "Properties|Methods" "$file" || echo "Properties/Methods sections not found in $file" doneLength of output: 2370
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the structure definitions in the codebase ast-grep --pattern 'struct ProxyServerConfig { $$$ }' ast-grep --pattern 'struct ServerProxyResource { $$$ }' # Also check the content of these documentation files more thoroughly for file in $(fd "ProxyServerConfig.html|ServerProxyResource.html" docs/Structs/); do echo "=== Content of $file ===" rg -A 10 '<h1>|<section class="section">|Declaration|Parameters|Returns' "$file" doneLength of output: 5753
docs/Classes/Mixpanel.html (1)
20-20: 💡 Codebase verification
Based on the shell script results, I can see that several new public APIs have been added, particularly around the proxy server functionality (
MixpanelProxyServerDelegate,ProxyServerConfig,ServerProxyResource). The output shows that these new additions have documentation comments (marked with/**or///), but there are other public APIs in the codebase that might be missing proper documentation, leading to the coverage decrease.Documentation coverage needs improvement in several areas
The following newly added or modified files need documentation review:
Sources/MixpanelInstance.swift: New proxy server related APIsSources/Network.swift: Network-related changesSources/AutomaticEvents.swiftandSources/AutomaticProperties.swift: Recent modificationsSources/Flush.swiftandSources/FlushRequest.swift: Recent changesPlease ensure all public APIs in these files have proper documentation comments to improve the coverage back to previous levels.
🔗 Analysis chain
Documentation coverage has decreased.
The documentation coverage has dropped from 83% to 80%. This decrease in coverage should be addressed by documenting the newly added features.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Find newly added but undocumented public APIs ast-grep --pattern 'public $_ $name($$$) { $$$ }'Length of output: 53
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's try a different approach to find Swift files and check their documentation # First, find all Swift files fd -e swift | while read -r file; do echo "=== $file ===" # Look for public declarations without documentation comments rg "^\s*public\s+" "$file" -B 2 doneLength of output: 17418
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Also check the documentation build configuration fd "jazzy|.jazzy" --hidden cat .jazzy.yaml 2>/dev/null || trueLength of output: 332
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check git diff for recent changes in Swift files that might need documentation git diff --name-only HEAD~1 HEAD | grep "\.swift$"Length of output: 373
docs/Classes/People.html (1)
112-114: 💡 Codebase verification
Based on the gathered information, I can now provide the final response:
Documentation needed for proxy server features
The proxy server implementation lacks proper documentation:
ProxyServerConfigandServerProxyResourcestructs are marked as "Undocumented"- While the implementation shows safety checks (preventing use of proxy headers with Mixpanel's default API) and delegate protocol documentation, there are no:
- Usage examples
- Configuration guidelines
- Security best practices
- Integration examples
The code implementation appears solid with proper safety checks, but without comprehensive documentation, developers may struggle to properly implement and secure these proxy server features.
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify integration of new proxy server features.
The addition of
MixpanelProxyServerDelegateprotocol and the new structures (ProxyServerConfig,ServerProxyResource) suggests significant changes to support proxy server configurations. These changes should be properly documented with:
- Usage examples
- Configuration guidelines
- Security considerations
Also applies to: 120-130
Let me gather more information about the documentation and implementation details.
Let me check the actual implementation details of these proxy server features to understand their usage better.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for documentation and implementation of proxy server features # Look for documentation files fd -e md -e html proxy # Search for implementation details rg -i "proxy.*server.*config" -g '!docs/*'Length of output: 1787
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the actual documentation content and implementation details # Check the protocol documentation cat docs/Protocols/MixpanelProxyServerDelegate.html | grep -A 20 "<h1" # Check the struct documentation cat docs/Structs/ProxyServerConfig.html | grep -A 20 "<h1" cat docs/Structs/ServerProxyResource.html | grep -A 20 "<h1" # Look for implementation details and examples rg -l "class.*MixpanelProxyServerDelegate" rg "ProxyServerConfig.*=|let.*ProxyServerConfig" -A 3Length of output: 7818
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check implementation details of proxy server features # Check the protocol and struct implementations rg -A 10 "struct ProxyServerConfig" Sources/ rg -A 10 "protocol MixpanelProxyServerDelegate" Sources/ # Look for usage examples in test files rg -A 5 "ProxyServerConfig" Tests/Length of output: 1840
Sources/Flush.swift (2)
118-118:
⚠️ Potential issueEnsure Thread-Safe Access to
flushBatchSizein Batch ProcessingIn
flushQueueInBatches,flushBatchSizeis accessed without synchronization. IfflushBatchSizeis modified concurrently, it could lead to inconsistent batch sizes during flushing. To prevent this, accessflushBatchSizewithin the synchronization lock.Apply this diff to synchronize access:
- let batchSize = min(mutableQueue.count, flushBatchSize) + let batchSize = min(mutableQueue.count, flushRequestReadWriteLock.sync { flushBatchSize })Alternatively, after synchronizing the
flushBatchSizeproperty as previously suggested, this access will be thread-safe.Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
62-69:
⚠️ Potential issueThread Safety Concern: Synchronize Access to
flushBatchSizeThe
flushBatchSizeproperty's getter and setter are not thread-safe. SinceflushBatchSizecan be accessed and modified from multiple threads, unsynchronized access may lead to race conditions or inconsistent behavior. To ensure thread safety, useflushRequestReadWriteLockto synchronize access, similar to howflushIntervalandserverURLare handled.Apply this diff to synchronize the
flushBatchSizeproperty:var flushBatchSize: Int { get { - return _flushBatchSize + flushRequestReadWriteLock.sync { + return _flushBatchSize + } } set { - _flushBatchSize = newValue + flushRequestReadWriteLock.sync(flags: .barrier) { + _flushBatchSize = newValue + } } }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.var flushBatchSize: Int { get { flushRequestReadWriteLock.sync { return _flushBatchSize } } set { flushRequestReadWriteLock.sync(flags: .barrier) { _flushBatchSize = newValue } } }Sources/MixpanelInstance.swift (5)
808-808:
⚠️ Potential issueEnsure thread safety when accessing 'alias' property
In the
createAliasmethod, there's a write toself.aliaswithout synchronization:self.readWriteLock.write { self.alias = alias }However, ensure that all accesses to
self.aliasare properly synchronized usingreadWriteLockto prevent race conditions.
152-163:
⚠️ Potential issueEnsure 'flushBatchSize' obeys minimum value and provides feedback
The
flushBatchSizeproperty sets the number of events sent in a single request, capped at 50:flushInstance.flushBatchSize = min(newValue, APIConstants.maxBatchSize)However, there's no check for a minimum value. Setting
flushBatchSizeto 0 or a negative number could lead to unexpected behavior. Consider enforcing a minimum value of 1 and providing feedback if an invalid value is set.Apply this diff to enforce a minimum value:
open var flushBatchSize: Int { get { return flushInstance.flushBatchSize } set { - flushInstance.flushBatchSize = min(newValue, APIConstants.maxBatchSize) + let validValue = min(max(newValue, 1), APIConstants.maxBatchSize) + flushInstance.flushBatchSize = validValue } }
265-285:
⚠️ Potential issueEnsure consistency between initializers by handling 'proxyServerConfig' appropriately
A new convenience initializer includes
proxyServerConfig, but the other initializer does not. This could lead to inconsistent initialization paths. Consider updating all initializers to acceptproxyServerConfigor ensuring thatproxyServerDelegateandserverURLare set consistently in all initialization paths.
426-437: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Ensure correct selector is used in notification observer
In
setupListeners(), the same selector#selector(handleSuperPropertiesRegistrationNotification(_:))is used for both registration and unregistration notifications.notificationCenter.addObserver( self, selector: #selector(handleSuperPropertiesRegistrationNotification(_:)), name: registerSuperPropertiesNotificationName, object: nil ) notificationCenter.addObserver( self, selector: #selector(handleSuperPropertiesRegistrationNotification(_:)), name: unregisterSuperPropertiesNotificationName, object: nil )Consider using separate methods for registration and unregistration to improve clarity and maintainability.
Apply this diff:
+@objc func handleSuperPropertiesUnregistrationNotification(_ notification: Notification) { + // Unregistration logic here +} notificationCenter.addObserver( self, selector: #selector(handleSuperPropertiesRegistrationNotification(_:)), name: registerSuperPropertiesNotificationName, object: nil ) notificationCenter.addObserver( self, - selector: #selector(handleSuperPropertiesRegistrationNotification(_:)), + selector: #selector(handleSuperPropertiesUnregistrationNotification(_:)), name: unregisterSuperPropertiesNotificationName, object: nil )
389-389: 💡 Codebase verification
visionOS support has been added but requires platform declaration update
The codebase shows that visionOS support was recently added through multiple PRs (mixpanel#618, mixpanel#627), but the Package.swift file doesn't declare visionOS as a supported platform. Update the platforms section in Package.swift to include visionOS support.
- Add
.visionOS(.v1)to the platforms array in Package.swift🔗 Analysis chain
Check availability of 'visionOS' in conditional compilation
The conditional compilation directive includes
#if os(iOS) || os(tvOS) || os(visionOS). Ensure thatos(visionOS)is correctly recognized by the compiler and that the SDK supports this OS target.Run the following script to check if
visionOSis a valid OS condition:Expect to see whether
visionOSis correctly handled.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if 'visionOS' is a valid OS in Swift conditional compilation echo '#if os(visionOS) print("visionOS is supported") #else print("visionOS is not supported") #endif' > test.swift swiftc test.swift -o test && ./testLength of output: 230
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the Package.swift file and other configuration files for visionOS support fd "Package.swift|\.xcodeproj" --type f --exec cat {} # Also check for other usages of visionOS in the codebase rg "visionOS" -lLength of output: 706
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the CHANGELOG.md to see when visionOS support was added rg "visionOS" CHANGELOG.md -A 2 -B 2 # Also check the context of visionOS usage in Constants.swift rg "visionOS" Sources/Constants.swift -A 2 -B 2Length of output: 518
MixpanelDemo/MixpanelDemo.xcodeproj/project.pbxproj (2)
1843-1846:
⚠️ Potential issuePotential code signing issues due to
Manualcode signing style and emptyDEVELOPMENT_TEAM.Changing
CODE_SIGN_STYLEtoManualand settingDEVELOPMENT_TEAMto an empty string may lead to code signing failures. For manual code signing, a validDEVELOPMENT_TEAMis required to properly sign the app. Please ensure that theDEVELOPMENT_TEAMis correctly specified for all configurations, or consider revertingCODE_SIGN_STYLEback toAutomaticif appropriate.Apply this diff to set
DEVELOPMENT_TEAMto a valid team ID:CODE_SIGN_STYLE = Manual; - DEVELOPMENT_TEAM = ""; + DEVELOPMENT_TEAM = "YourTeamID";Replace
"YourTeamID"with your actual development team identifier.Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
1901-1906:
⚠️ Potential issueInconsistent code signing identities and
DEVELOPMENT_TEAMsettings across SDKs.There are inconsistencies in the
CODE_SIGN_IDENTITYandDEVELOPMENT_TEAMsettings across different SDKs:
- For
iphoneos,CODE_SIGN_IDENTITY[sdk=iphoneos*]is set to"iPhone Developer", butDEVELOPMENT_TEAM[sdk=iphoneos*]is empty.- In the base configuration,
DEVELOPMENT_TEAMis set toAXVA7A4XGX, but foriphoneos, it's overridden to an empty string.- For
macosx,CODE_SIGN_IDENTITY[sdk=macosx*]is set to"-", and there's no specificDEVELOPMENT_TEAMformacosx.These discrepancies may cause code signing failures during the build process. Ensure that
DEVELOPMENT_TEAMandCODE_SIGN_IDENTITYare consistently set for all target SDKs to prevent build issues.Apply this diff to ensure consistent settings:
"CODE_SIGN_IDENTITY[sdk=iphoneos*]" = "iPhone Developer"; "CODE_SIGN_IDENTITY[sdk=macosx*]" = "-"; DEVELOPMENT_TEAM = AXVA7A4XGX; - "DEVELOPMENT_TEAM[sdk=iphoneos*]" = ""; + "DEVELOPMENT_TEAM[sdk=iphoneos*]" = AXVA7A4XGX;Ensure that all
DEVELOPMENT_TEAMentries use the correct team identifier, and adjust theCODE_SIGN_IDENTITYsettings as needed for each SDK.📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements."CODE_SIGN_IDENTITY[sdk=iphoneos*]" = "iPhone Developer"; "CODE_SIGN_IDENTITY[sdk=macosx*]" = "-"; CODE_SIGN_STYLE = Manual; DEVELOPMENT_TEAM = AXVA7A4XGX; "DEVELOPMENT_TEAM[sdk=iphoneos*]" = AXVA7A4XGX; "DEVELOPMENT_TEAM[sdk=macosx*]" = "";
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
MixpanelProxyServerDelegateprotocol for enhanced proxy server configuration.ProxyServerConfigandServerProxyResourcestructures for managing server interactions.Bug Fixes
Documentation
Chores
CHANGELOG.mdwith new version entries and enhancements.generate_docs.shto reflect the new module version.