Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

change the grid to r05_r05 for lnd_rof_two_way test #6388

Conversation

donghuix
Copy link
Contributor

@donghuix donghuix commented May 2, 2024

ERS.f09_f09.IELM.elm-lnd_rof_2way in the test suits results in negative channel water storage in MOSART.
This was raised in #6313.
The reason is that f09_f09 uses different spatial resolutions in ELM and MOSART.
This is problematic for land river two-way coupling, which requires the same grid in ELM and MOSART.

This PR changed f09_f09 to r05_r05 for the land river two-way test, and there is no negative main channel storage.

[BFB]

@rljacob rljacob added MOSART MOSART river model Testing Anything related to unit/system tests labels May 2, 2024
@peterdschwartz
Copy link
Contributor

Since this has one review and the discussion on the other PR seemed to reach an agreement, I'll go ahead and merge this PR and the other one today

peterdschwartz added a commit that referenced this pull request May 9, 2024
)

ERS.f09_f09.IELM.elm-lnd_rof_2way in the test suits results in negative channel water storage in MOSART.
This was raised in #6313.
The reason is that f09_f09 uses different spatial resolutions in ELM and MOSART.
This is problematic for land river two-way coupling, which requires the same grid in ELM and MOSART.

This PR changed f09_f09 to r05_r05 for the land river two-way test, and there is no negative main channel storage.

[BFB]
@peterdschwartz
Copy link
Contributor

merged to next

@peterdschwartz peterdschwartz merged commit cf32a25 into E3SM-Project:master May 10, 2024
20 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
MOSART MOSART river model Testing Anything related to unit/system tests
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants