[$250][P2P Distance] - Amount field is not grayed out when changing distance rate offline #46880

m-natarajan · 2024-08-06T12:54:19Z

If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email contributors@expensify.com to request to join our Slack channel!

Issue found when validating #40021
Version Number: 9.0.17-0
Reproducible in staging?: y
Reproducible in production?: no, new feature
If this was caught during regression testing, add the test name, ID and link from TestRail:
Email or phone of affected tester (no customers): applausetester+kh05081@applause.expensifail.com
Logs: https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/4856
Expensify/Expensify Issue URL:
Issue reported by: Applause internal team
Slack conversation:

Action Performed:

Precondition:

Workspace has a few distance rates.

Go to staging.new.expensify.com
Go to workspace chat.
Submit a distance expense.
Go to transaction thread.
Go offline.
Click Rate.
Select a different rate.

Expected Result:

Amount field should be grayed out because it is changed from the rate offline.

Actual Result:

Amount field is not grayed out when changing distance rate offline.

Workaround:

unknown

Platforms:

Which of our officially supported platforms is this issue occurring on?

Screenshots/Videos

Bug6563316_1722946380136.bandicam_2024-08-06_20-08-53-476.mp4

View all open jobs on GitHub

Upwork Automation - Do Not Edit

Upwork Job URL: https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~01199ead94cf3782d9
Upwork Job ID: 1820883188663849553
Last Price Increase: 2024-08-06
Automatic offers:

jjcoffee | Reviewer | 103451212
etCoderDysto | Contributor | 103451215

Issue Owner

Current Issue Owner: @jjcoffee

melvin-bot · 2024-08-06T12:54:28Z

Triggered auto assignment to @RachCHopkins (Bug), see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/14418 for more details. Please add this bug to a GH project, as outlined in the SO.

melvin-bot · 2024-08-06T12:54:29Z

Triggered auto assignment to @johnmlee101 (DeployBlockerCash), see https://stackoverflowteams.com/c/expensify/questions/9980/ for more details.

github-actions · 2024-08-06T12:54:35Z

👋 Friendly reminder that deploy blockers are time-sensitive ⏱ issues! Check out the open `StagingDeployCash` deploy checklist to see the list of PRs included in this release, then work quickly to do one of the following:

Identify the pull request that introduced this issue and revert it.
Find someone who can quickly fix the issue.
Fix the issue yourself.

etCoderDysto · 2024-08-06T13:09:21Z

Proposal

Please re-state the problem that we are trying to solve in this issue.

Amount field is not grayed out when changing distance rate offline

What is the root cause of that problem?

We are checking for amount change pending action only here

App/src/components/ReportActionItem/MoneyRequestView.tsx

Line 503 in 290a9d9

What changes do you think we should make in order to solve the problem?

We should also check for tax rate change pending action too

<OfflineWithFeedback pendingAction={getPendingFieldAction('amount') ?? getPendingFieldAction('customUnitRateID')}>

What alternative solutions did you explore? (Optional)

Krishna2323 · 2024-08-06T14:16:31Z

Edited by proposal-police: This proposal was edited at 2024-08-08 07:31:44 UTC.

Proposal

Please re-state the problem that we are trying to solve in this issue.

Distance - Amount field is not grayed out when changing distance rate offline

What is the root cause of that problem?

In getUpdateMoneyRequestParams the amount is recalculated if hasPendingWaypoints || hasModifiedDistanceRate is true but the pending action/error for amount is not added.

App/src/libs/actions/IOU.ts

Lines 2527 to 2553 in 963f8ce

    
           const hasPendingWaypoints = 'waypoints' in transactionChanges; 
        
           const hasModifiedDistanceRate = 'customUnitRateID' in transactionChanges; 
        
           if (transaction && updatedTransaction && (hasPendingWaypoints || hasModifiedDistanceRate)) { 
        
               updatedTransaction = { 
        
                   ...updatedTransaction, 
        
                   ...TransactionUtils.calculateAmountForUpdatedWaypointOrRate(transaction, transactionChanges, policy, ReportUtils.isExpenseReport(iouReport)), 
        
               }; 
        
               // Delete the draft transaction when editing waypoints when the server responds successfully and there are no errors 
        
               successData.push({ 
        
                   onyxMethod: Onyx.METHOD.SET, 
        
                   key: `${ONYXKEYS.COLLECTION.TRANSACTION_DRAFT}${transactionID}`, 
        
                   value: null, 
        
               }); 
        
               // Revert the transaction's amount to the original value on failure. 
        
               // The IOU Report will be fully reverted in the failureData further below. 
        
               failureData.push({ 
        
                   onyxMethod: Onyx.METHOD.MERGE, 
        
                   key: `${ONYXKEYS.COLLECTION.TRANSACTION}${transactionID}`, 
        
                   value: { 
        
                       amount: transaction.amount, 
        
                       modifiedAmount: transaction.modifiedAmount, 
        
                       modifiedMerchant: transaction.modifiedMerchant, 
        
                   }, 
        
               }); 
        
           }

App/src/libs/actions/IOU.ts

Lines 2498 to 2500 in 963f8ce

    
           const pendingFields = Object.fromEntries(Object.keys(transactionChanges).map((key) => [key, CONST.RED_BRICK_ROAD_PENDING_ACTION.UPDATE])); 
        
           const clearedPendingFields = Object.fromEntries(Object.keys(transactionChanges).map((key) => [key, null])); 
        
           const errorFields = Object.fromEntries(Object.keys(pendingFields).map((key) => [key, {[DateUtils.getMicroseconds()]: Localize.translateLocal('iou.error.genericEditFailureMessage')}]));

What changes do you think we should make in order to solve the problem?

Define pendingFields, clearedPendingFields & errorFields using let instead of const and when we update the amount update all these.

    if (transaction && updatedTransaction && (hasPendingWaypoints || hasModifiedDistanceRate)) {
        updatedTransaction = {
            ...updatedTransaction,
            ...TransactionUtils.calculateAmountForUpdatedWaypointOrRate(transaction, transactionChanges, policy, ReportUtils.isExpenseReport(iouReport)),
        };

        pendingFields = {...pendingFields, amount: 'update'};
        clearedPendingFields = {...clearedPendingFields, amount: null};
        errorFields = {...errorFields, amount: {[DateUtils.getMicroseconds()]: Localize.translateLocal('iou.error.genericEditFailureMessage')}};

The same should be done in getUpdateTrackExpenseParams also.

Note: We only need to update the pending action for amount. modifiedAmount, modifiedMerchant, and modifiedCurrency are only used to show the update messages.

App/src/pages/home/report/ReportActionItem.tsx

Lines 636 to 637 in 53eee53

    
           } else if (action.actionName === CONST.REPORT.ACTIONS.TYPE.MODIFIED_EXPENSE) { 
        
               children = <ReportActionItemBasicMessage message={ModifiedExpenseMessage.getForReportAction(report.reportID, action)} />;

App/src/libs/ModifiedExpenseMessage.ts

Lines 115 to 138 in 53eee53

    
           function getForReportAction(reportID: string | undefined, reportAction: OnyxEntry<ReportAction>): string { 
        
               if (!ReportActionsUtils.isModifiedExpenseAction(reportAction)) { 
        
                   return ''; 
        
               } 
        
               const reportActionOriginalMessage = ReportActionsUtils.getOriginalMessage(reportAction); 
        
               const policyID = ReportConnection.getAllReports()?.[`${ONYXKEYS.COLLECTION.REPORT}${reportID}`]?.policyID ?? '-1'; 
        
               const removalFragments: string[] = []; 
        
               const setFragments: string[] = []; 
        
               const changeFragments: string[] = []; 
        
               const hasModifiedAmount = 
        
                   reportActionOriginalMessage && 
        
                   'oldAmount' in reportActionOriginalMessage && 
        
                   'oldCurrency' in reportActionOriginalMessage && 
        
                   'amount' in reportActionOriginalMessage && 
        
                   'currency' in reportActionOriginalMessage; 
        
               const hasModifiedMerchant = reportActionOriginalMessage && 'oldMerchant' in reportActionOriginalMessage && 'merchant' in reportActionOriginalMessage; 
        
               if (hasModifiedAmount) { 
        
                   const oldCurrency = reportActionOriginalMessage?.oldCurrency; 
        
                   const oldAmountValue = reportActionOriginalMessage?.oldAmount ?? 0; 
        
                   const oldAmount = oldAmountValue > 0 ? CurrencyUtils.convertToDisplayString(reportActionOriginalMessage?.oldAmount ?? 0, oldCurrency) : '';

What alternative solutions did you explore? (Optional)

neil-marcellini · 2024-08-06T18:02:19Z

Not a blocker since the rate field is still behind a beta.

melvin-bot · 2024-08-06T18:02:38Z

Job added to Upwork: https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~01199ead94cf3782d9

melvin-bot · 2024-08-06T18:02:43Z

Triggered auto assignment to Contributor-plus team member for initial proposal review - @jjcoffee (External)

jjcoffee · 2024-08-07T15:33:10Z

Reviewing proposals tomorrow!

wildan-m · 2024-08-08T04:29:51Z

Proposal

Please re-state the problem that we are trying to solve in this issue.

Distance - Amount field is not grayed out when changing distance rate offline

What is the root cause of that problem?

In calculateAmountForUpdatedWaypointOrRate Dependent pending fields not added when the affected value changes

What changes do you think we should make in order to solve the problem?

By following this pattern. We can modify
calculateAmountForUpdatedWaypointOrRate to

....
        modifiedAmount: updatedAmount,
        modifiedMerchant: updatedMerchant,
        modifiedCurrency: updatedCurrency,

        pendingFields: {
            ...transaction?.pendingFields,
            ...(!lodashIsEqual(updatedAmount, transaction?.modifiedAmount ?? transaction?.amount) && { amount: CONST.RED_BRICK_ROAD_PENDING_ACTION.UPDATE }),
            ...(!lodashIsEqual(updatedMerchant, transaction?.modifiedMerchant ?? transaction?.merchant) && { merchant: CONST.RED_BRICK_ROAD_PENDING_ACTION.UPDATE }),
            ...(!lodashIsEqual(updatedCurrency, transaction?.modifiedCurrency ?? transaction?.currency) && { currency: CONST.RED_BRICK_ROAD_PENDING_ACTION.UPDATE })
        },
    };

This way we only add pending fields, if the value actually change. the pending field not only amount, it can also merchant or currency.

Then we can move / modify this step to the step after we finished modify updatedTransaction.

Modify the transactionChanges to also include affected fields.

src/libs/actions/IOU.ts getUpdateTrackExpenseParams and getUpdateMoneyRequestParams

....
    // Set any "pending fields"  (ones updated while the user was offline), includes the fields that affected to have error messages in the failureData
    const allTransactionChanges = { ...transactionChanges, ...(updatedTransaction ? updatedTransaction.pendingFields : {}) }
    const pendingFields = Object.fromEntries(Object.keys(allTransactionChanges).map((key) => [key, CONST.RED_BRICK_ROAD_PENDING_ACTION.UPDATE]));
    const clearedPendingFields = Object.fromEntries(Object.keys(allTransactionChanges).map((key) => [key, null]));
    const errorFields = Object.fromEntries(Object.keys(allTransactionChanges).map((key) => [key, {[DateUtils.getMicroseconds()]: Localize.translateLocal('iou.error.genericEditFailureMessage')}]));

Branch draft for this solution

What alternative solutions did you explore? (Optional)

Krishna2323 · 2024-08-08T07:33:38Z

Proposal Updated

Added a note

jjcoffee · 2024-08-08T15:05:46Z

@etCoderDysto's proposal LGTM - it's a nice and simple solution, and a pattern that we use elsewhere, e.g. here

App/src/pages/workspace/distanceRates/PolicyDistanceRateDetailsPage.tsx

Line 128 in 73f97c9

pendingAction={rate?.pendingFields?.rate ?? rate?.pendingFields?.currency}

I'm not aware of any other reason to specifically set the amount field as pending as the other two proposals have, so it seems much simpler to just rely on the field that's actually changed.

🎀👀🎀 C+ reviewed

etCoderDysto · 2024-08-11T10:54:52Z

Hi @paultsimura, amount is not blank when editing waypoint followed by editing rate. It is only blank when editing waypoints.

Screen.Recording.2024-08-11.at.1.50.33.in.the.afternoon.mp4

paultsimura · 2024-08-11T11:11:04Z

@etCoderDysto this should be fixed by #47145, we can hold for it.

etCoderDysto · 2024-08-11T12:50:55Z

@etCoderDysto this should be fixed by #47145, we can hold for it.

Sounds good to me. I will wait till the pr is merged to main

jjcoffee · 2024-08-12T10:35:37Z

@RachCHopkins Can you add a hold for #47145? Thanks!

melvin-bot · 2024-08-15T18:17:12Z

@johnmlee101, @jjcoffee, @RachCHopkins, @etCoderDysto Whoops! This issue is 2 days overdue. Let's get this updated quick!

etCoderDysto · 2024-08-15T18:23:42Z

Waiting for #47145 to be merged to main

jjcoffee · 2024-08-16T09:39:25Z

Waiting for #47145 to be merged to main

Confirming to remove the overdue label 😅

jjcoffee · 2024-08-19T09:51:31Z

@etCoderDysto #47145 has been merged. Let's go! 🚀

etCoderDysto · 2024-08-19T10:07:31Z

@etCoderDysto #47145 has been merged. Let's go! 🚀

Great! I will raise a PR soon.

melvin-bot · 2024-08-20T18:00:17Z

@johnmlee101 @jjcoffee @RachCHopkins @etCoderDysto this issue was created 2 weeks ago. Are we close to approving a proposal? If not, what's blocking us from getting this issue assigned? Don't hesitate to create a thread in #expensify-open-source to align faster in real time. Thanks!

RachCHopkins · 2024-08-20T21:04:58Z

Sorry guys, missed this one - I'm a little swamped and not really watching closely unless I'm starred.

jjcoffee · 2024-08-21T07:44:07Z

@RachCHopkins No worries, we're just waiting on a PR from @etCoderDysto here!

etCoderDysto · 2024-08-21T10:27:03Z

@jjcoffee PR is ready for review. Sorry for the delay.

jjcoffee · 2024-09-04T08:44:27Z

Note

The production deploy automation failed: This should be on [HOLD for Payment 2024-09-06] according to #48035 prod deploy checklist, confirmed in https://expensify.slack.com/archives/C01GTK53T8Q/p1725051480370659?thread_ts=1725050431.962859&cid=C01GTK53T8Q.

cc @RachCHopkins

etCoderDysto · 2024-09-06T06:15:55Z

Note

The production deploy automation failed: This should be on [HOLD for Payment 2024-09-06] according to #48035 prod deploy checklist, confirmed in https://expensify.slack.com/archives/C01GTK53T8Q/p1725051480370659?thread_ts=1725050431.962859&cid=C01GTK53T8Q.

cc @RachCHopkins

I think this issue is ready for payout.
cc @RachCHopkins

jjcoffee · 2024-09-06T13:36:14Z

The PR that introduced the bug has been identified. Link to the PR: feat: Edit Distance Rate flow #40021
The offending PR has been commented on, pointing out the bug it caused and why, so the author and reviewers can learn from the mistake. Link to comment: feat: Edit Distance Rate flow #40021 (comment)
A discussion in #expensify-bugs has been started about whether any other steps should be taken (e.g. updating the PR review checklist) in order to catch this type of bug sooner. Link to discussion: N/A - more thorough testing should have caught it
Determine if we should create a regression test for this bug. Yes
If we decide to create a regression test for the bug, please propose the regression test steps to ensure the same bug will not reach production again.

Regression Test Proposal

Go to any workspace chat.
Submit a distance expense.
Go to the transaction thread.
Go offline.
Click Rate and select a different rate.
Verify that the amount field is greyed out.

Do we agree 👍 or 👎

RachCHopkins · 2024-09-09T06:02:59Z

Payment Summary:

Contributor: @etCoderDysto paid $250 via Upwork
Contributor+: @jjcoffee paid $250 via Upwork

Upwork job here

RachCHopkins · 2024-09-09T06:04:42Z

Contributor has been paid, the contract has been completed, and the Upwork post has been closed.

m-natarajan added DeployBlockerCash This issue or pull request should block deployment Daily KSv2 Bug Something is broken. Auto assigns a BugZero manager. DeployBlocker Indicates it should block deploying the API labels Aug 6, 2024

melvin-bot bot assigned RachCHopkins Aug 6, 2024

melvin-bot bot assigned johnmlee101 Aug 6, 2024

github-actions bot added Engineering Hourly KSv2 and removed Daily KSv2 labels Aug 6, 2024

github-actions bot mentioned this issue Aug 6, 2024

Deploy Checklist: New Expensify 2024-08-06 #46849

Closed

83 tasks

neil-marcellini added External Added to denote the issue can be worked on by a contributor Daily KSv2 and removed DeployBlockerCash This issue or pull request should block deployment Hourly KSv2 DeployBlocker Indicates it should block deploying the API labels Aug 6, 2024

melvin-bot bot changed the title ~~Distance - Amount field is not grayed out when changing distance rate offline~~ [$250] Distance - Amount field is not grayed out when changing distance rate offline Aug 6, 2024

melvin-bot bot added the Help Wanted Apply this label when an issue is open to proposals by contributors label Aug 6, 2024

melvin-bot bot assigned jjcoffee Aug 6, 2024

melvin-bot bot added the Overdue label Aug 11, 2024

melvin-bot bot removed the Overdue label Aug 12, 2024

neil-marcellini changed the title ~~[$250] Distance - Amount field is not grayed out when changing distance rate offline~~ [$250][P2P Distance] - Amount field is not grayed out when changing distance rate offline Aug 13, 2024

melvin-bot bot added the Overdue label Aug 15, 2024

melvin-bot bot removed the Overdue label Aug 16, 2024

etCoderDysto mentioned this issue Aug 21, 2024

fix: Gray out amount filed when distance rate is changed #47779

Merged

51 tasks

melvin-bot bot added Reviewing Has a PR in review Weekly KSv2 and removed Daily KSv2 labels Aug 21, 2024

Krishna2323 mentioned this issue Aug 27, 2024

Distance - Amount field is no longer grayed out after changing rate and then distance offline #48111

Closed

6 tasks

jjcoffee mentioned this issue Sep 6, 2024

feat: Edit Distance Rate flow #40021

Merged

48 tasks

RachCHopkins closed this as completed Sep 9, 2024

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

[$250][P2P Distance] - Amount field is not grayed out when changing distance rate offline #46880

[$250][P2P Distance] - Amount field is not grayed out when changing distance rate offline #46880

m-natarajan commented Aug 6, 2024 •

edited by melvin-bot bot

Loading

melvin-bot bot commented Aug 6, 2024

melvin-bot bot commented Aug 6, 2024

github-actions bot commented Aug 6, 2024

etCoderDysto commented Aug 6, 2024 •

edited

Loading

Krishna2323 commented Aug 6, 2024 •

edited

Loading

neil-marcellini commented Aug 6, 2024

melvin-bot bot commented Aug 6, 2024

melvin-bot bot commented Aug 6, 2024

jjcoffee commented Aug 7, 2024

wildan-m commented Aug 8, 2024

Krishna2323 commented Aug 8, 2024

jjcoffee commented Aug 8, 2024

etCoderDysto commented Aug 11, 2024

paultsimura commented Aug 11, 2024 •

edited

Loading

etCoderDysto commented Aug 11, 2024

jjcoffee commented Aug 12, 2024

melvin-bot bot commented Aug 15, 2024

etCoderDysto commented Aug 15, 2024

jjcoffee commented Aug 16, 2024

jjcoffee commented Aug 19, 2024

etCoderDysto commented Aug 19, 2024

melvin-bot bot commented Aug 20, 2024

RachCHopkins commented Aug 20, 2024

jjcoffee commented Aug 21, 2024

etCoderDysto commented Aug 21, 2024

jjcoffee commented Sep 4, 2024

etCoderDysto commented Sep 6, 2024

jjcoffee commented Sep 6, 2024

RachCHopkins commented Sep 9, 2024

RachCHopkins commented Sep 9, 2024

[$250][P2P Distance] - Amount field is not grayed out when changing distance rate offline #46880

[$250][P2P Distance] - Amount field is not grayed out when changing distance rate offline #46880

Comments

m-natarajan commented Aug 6, 2024 • edited by melvin-bot bot Loading

Action Performed:

Expected Result:

Actual Result:

Workaround:

Platforms:

Screenshots/Videos

melvin-bot bot commented Aug 6, 2024

melvin-bot bot commented Aug 6, 2024

github-actions bot commented Aug 6, 2024

etCoderDysto commented Aug 6, 2024 • edited Loading

Proposal

Please re-state the problem that we are trying to solve in this issue.

What is the root cause of that problem?

What changes do you think we should make in order to solve the problem?

What alternative solutions did you explore? (Optional)

Krishna2323 commented Aug 6, 2024 • edited Loading

Proposal

Please re-state the problem that we are trying to solve in this issue.

What is the root cause of that problem?

What changes do you think we should make in order to solve the problem?

What alternative solutions did you explore? (Optional)

neil-marcellini commented Aug 6, 2024

melvin-bot bot commented Aug 6, 2024

melvin-bot bot commented Aug 6, 2024

jjcoffee commented Aug 7, 2024

wildan-m commented Aug 8, 2024

Proposal

Please re-state the problem that we are trying to solve in this issue.

What is the root cause of that problem?

What changes do you think we should make in order to solve the problem?

What alternative solutions did you explore? (Optional)

Krishna2323 commented Aug 8, 2024

Proposal Updated

jjcoffee commented Aug 8, 2024

etCoderDysto commented Aug 11, 2024

paultsimura commented Aug 11, 2024 • edited Loading

etCoderDysto commented Aug 11, 2024

jjcoffee commented Aug 12, 2024

melvin-bot bot commented Aug 15, 2024

etCoderDysto commented Aug 15, 2024

jjcoffee commented Aug 16, 2024

jjcoffee commented Aug 19, 2024

etCoderDysto commented Aug 19, 2024

melvin-bot bot commented Aug 20, 2024

RachCHopkins commented Aug 20, 2024

jjcoffee commented Aug 21, 2024

etCoderDysto commented Aug 21, 2024

jjcoffee commented Sep 4, 2024

etCoderDysto commented Sep 6, 2024

jjcoffee commented Sep 6, 2024

RachCHopkins commented Sep 9, 2024

RachCHopkins commented Sep 9, 2024

m-natarajan commented Aug 6, 2024 •

edited by melvin-bot bot

Loading

etCoderDysto commented Aug 6, 2024 •

edited

Loading

Krishna2323 commented Aug 6, 2024 •

edited

Loading

paultsimura commented Aug 11, 2024 •

edited

Loading