Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature Request - Adding Support for Bot asking Optional Type Questions and It builds context based on user response [FEATURE] #664

Closed
Vikson97 opened this issue Jul 31, 2023 · 3 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request in-work Issue in work

Comments

@Vikson97
Copy link

Issue Description:
As a user of Flowise, I would like to propose a feature enhancement that allows the chatbot to ask optional type questions to users. The implementation of this feature will enable the chatbot to create context based on the user's responses, leading to more engaging and personalized conversations.

Problem Statement:
Currently, the chatbot in Flowise lacks the ability to ask optional questions to users. As a result, the conversation flow may become rigid and less interactive, hindering the bot's ability to gather specific information for context generation. By incorporating the proposed feature, the chatbot will be empowered to prompt users with optional questions, thus capturing additional relevant details and enriching the context.

A suggestion on this will be much helpful if i can achieve the above functionality with latest release of flowise or any chatflow diagram?

@HenryHengZJ
Copy link
Contributor

good suggestion! this sounds more like a workflow based approach, as in you can use tagging chain to determine the tone, categories that user is asking, and route that to a chain/agent with specific system message prompt, so on and so forth

@HenryHengZJ HenryHengZJ added the enhancement New feature or request label Aug 1, 2023
@Matr1xCode
Copy link

Hello, any update ? thanks

@HenryHengZJ HenryHengZJ added the in-work Issue in work label Sep 19, 2024
@HenryHengZJ
Copy link
Contributor

Merged: #3280

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request in-work Issue in work
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants