Sync tag sdr_v2.1.2.6 into develop

[sdrabenh]

@amdasilva this PR captures the changes made to accommodate Krok. Please see the owners of the commits below for questions. There were several merge conflicts, so hopefully my hand-merges are correct. I'm unsure at this point whether this PR is 0-diff or not. I would have to test this to be sure. In the meantime I will mark it as both.

[github-actions]

Label error. Requires at least 1 of: 0 diff, 0 diff trivial, Non 0-diff, 0 diff structural, 0-diff trivial, Not 0-diff, 0-diff, automatic, 0-diff uncoupled. Found:

[github-actions]

Label error. Requires at least 1 of: 0 diff, 0 diff trivial, Non 0-diff, 0 diff structural, 0-diff trivial, Not 0-diff, 0-diff, automatic, 0-diff uncoupled. Found:

[amdasilva]

It looks good, but see #231 regarding architecture violation (which has been introduced prior to this PR).

[sdrabenh]

It looks good, but see #231 regarding architecture violation (which has been introduced prior to this PR).

I will raise this with @wmputman on Monday

[mathomp4]

@sdrabenh I updated the CHANGELOG.md in this branch to remove all the references to sdr_* tags as well as remove redundant entries (e.g., GOCART Data).

[mathomp4]

Also just fixed a bad-merge line causing a CI failure.

And updated the components.yaml to match GEOSgcm v11. I think that might also have been an issue.

[mathomp4]

Update: I've added the bugfix I talk about in #234 here as well as I think it is a bug.

[amdasilva]

As I mentioned before, the microphysics callback needs work as it now consulting the GCM rc file to find out about its coupling context, something that is an architecture violation.