Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Close or explain gap to (Spada et al. 2011) #27

Closed
JanJereczek opened this issue Apr 27, 2023 · 2 comments
Closed

Close or explain gap to (Spada et al. 2011) #27

JanJereczek opened this issue Apr 27, 2023 · 2 comments
Labels
inaccurate results The output of FastIsostasy differs from what we expect

Comments

@JanJereczek
Copy link
Owner

Results for geoid differ substantially. Address this!
@JanJereczek JanJereczek added the inaccurate results The output of FastIsostasy differs from what we expect label Apr 27, 2023
@JanJereczek
Copy link
Owner Author

JanJereczek commented May 12, 2023 •
edited
Loading

1D GIA models apply shift for mass conservation. We do not apply such step and thus expect some biased results in our case. Can we correct this by introducing a mass conservation term?

@JanJereczek
Copy link
Owner Author

Solved in #54

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
inaccurate results The output of FastIsostasy differs from what we expect
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@JanJereczek