-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Broken inlining #13551
Labels
Comments
In case you need an easier way to detect this with automated tools: the code I posted (#13552) incurs a very severe penalty, 9x slower and 30x more memory allocations. |
yuyichao
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 11, 2015
yuyichao
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 11, 2015
This was referenced Oct 11, 2015
JeffBezanson
added
the
regression
Regression in behavior compared to a previous version
label
Oct 12, 2015
yuyichao
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 29, 2015
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
Seems that inlining is broken on the current master.
Tested using the test script for #13286 .
For bad commit, the
code_typed
clearly shows that many simple functions are not inlined.Bisected to a33cd07
Bisect log
Noticed that this is already caught by @andreasnoack in the commit comment after the bisect. I decided to post it anyway since there doesn't seems to be an issue for it yet.
cc @vtjnash
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: