Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RFC: the generalized eigenvalue problem (#6758) #6801

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 18, 2014
Merged

RFC: the generalized eigenvalue problem (#6758) #6801

merged 1 commit into from
May 18, 2014

Conversation

ViralBShah
Copy link
Member

WIP for the generalized eigenvalue problem (#6758)

function eigs(A;nev::Integer=6, ncv::Integer=20, which::ASCIIString="LM",
eigs(A; args...) = eigs(A, :Identity, args...)

function eigs(A, B; nev::Integer=6, ncv::Integer=20, which::ASCIIString="LM",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Might consider changing which to be a symbol, which seems to be the direction we are going with parameters such as this? Or does it matter?

I guess that change could be separate from this PR.

Remove complexOP keyword argument, as I believe it was not used correctly.
Update docs and add tests.
@ViralBShah
Copy link
Member Author

The GEP support is almost ready to merge.

@kmsquire We could also move the which arguments to symbols.

@ViralBShah ViralBShah added this to the 0.3 milestone May 18, 2014
@ViralBShah ViralBShah self-assigned this May 18, 2014
@ViralBShah ViralBShah changed the title WIP for the generalized eigenvalue problem (#6758) RFC: the generalized eigenvalue problem (#6758) May 18, 2014
ViralBShah added a commit that referenced this pull request May 18, 2014
RFC: the generalized eigenvalue problem (#6758)
@ViralBShah ViralBShah merged commit 793964b into master May 18, 2014
@ViralBShah ViralBShah deleted the vs/eigs branch May 18, 2014 18:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants