We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
==
This took me by surprise, so i wondered if this was intentioned behaviour or if it was a missing feature?
julia> mv = MvNormal(rand(3), let x=rand(3,3); x*x'+I; end); julia> mv2 = deepcopy(mv); julia> mv == mv2 false
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It's intended in the sense that it's a general phenomenon not specific to distributions: [1], [2], [3].
Sorry, something went wrong.
right, makes sense, so i think we file it under "missing feature"?
I presume that we want mv == mv2 in the example above, and it's just that this is a case where Julia doesn't give us it for free.
mv == mv2
xref #696
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
This took me by surprise, so i wondered if this was intentioned behaviour or if it was a missing feature?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: