You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Did you check to see if this issue already exists?
Is this only a feature request? Do not put multiple feature requests in one issue.
Is this a backend issue? Use the lemmy-ui repo for UI / frontend issues.
Is your proposal related to a problem?
Currently, Lemmy uses an upvote/downvote system for ranking content, which often leads to users treating it as a like/dislike mechanism rather than evaluating the relevance of the content. This can result in content being ranked based on popularity rather than quality or relevance.
Describe the solution you'd like.
I propose an expandable menu for each post or comment that includes star ratings for various criteria, such as:
Irrelevant-Relevant
Dislike-Like
Low Quality-High Quality
Unhelpful-Helpful
Ordinary-Creative
Serious-Humorous
Rude-Polite
Violent-Harmless
The results of these ratings would not be displayed until after the votes are cast, and users could fill in any number of them. This would allow content to be ranked based on a more comprehensive evaluation, rather than just its popularity.
Identification of malicious or biased users: By flagging users who consistently vote far from the consensus, the feature may help identify users who are intentionally manipulating the ranking system or exhibiting biased behavior.
Implementing this feature could significantly improve the content ranking system on Lemmy, making it more comprehensive and accurate. However, it could also complicate the ranking system, and I don't know whether the payoff would be worth the added complexity.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I don't think it is possible to make comprehensive sorting algorithms with and it would likely overwhelm tons of people - I can't imagine how this would even look under a comment. I'm sorry, closing
Requirements
Is your proposal related to a problem?
Currently, Lemmy uses an upvote/downvote system for ranking content, which often leads to users treating it as a like/dislike mechanism rather than evaluating the relevance of the content. This can result in content being ranked based on popularity rather than quality or relevance.
Describe the solution you'd like.
I propose an expandable menu for each post or comment that includes star ratings for various criteria, such as:
The results of these ratings would not be displayed until after the votes are cast, and users could fill in any number of them. This would allow content to be ranked based on a more comprehensive evaluation, rather than just its popularity.
Identification of malicious or biased users: By flagging users who consistently vote far from the consensus, the feature may help identify users who are intentionally manipulating the ranking system or exhibiting biased behavior.
It would make for a more interesting Stats Page for Voting Affinity and Engagement Analysis.
This idea is inspired by the Likes/Dislikes issue on GitHub and OpenAssistant.
Additional context
Implementing this feature could significantly improve the content ranking system on Lemmy, making it more comprehensive and accurate. However, it could also complicate the ranking system, and I don't know whether the payoff would be worth the added complexity.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: