update sbt plugins

[xuwei-k]

No description provided.

[sarahgerweck]

@xuwei-k is there any particular motivation for this PR?

[sarahgerweck]

Based on your blog, I believe this PR, which requires me to do all the testing since it changes publish-to-Sonatype plugins, is an attempt to game GitHub statistics so you appear to be a contributor to projects where you didn't contribute anything material. If you can convince me otherwise, I'll happily accept your changes; otherwise please don't submit any more PRs like this.

[eed3si9n]

Based on your blog, I believe this PR, which requires me to do all the testing since it changes publish-to-Sonatype plugins, is an attempt to game GitHub statistics so you appear to be a contributor to projects where you didn't contribute anything material.

It's ultimately up to project maintainers to accept or reject contributions because it doesn't come with tests or disagreements etc, but I think this is an unfair characterization of Yoshida-san's PR.

MiMa bump normally doesn't require additional work, but it often is finding corner cases of binary incompatibility. In this case 0.2.0 should bring the fix for lightbend-labs/mima#196. sbt-pgp 1.1.1 brings in sbt/sbt-pgp#121.

Also it's fairly common for contributors to first make superficial changes before they get into more meatier stuff. He does a lot for the community, so I had to say something.

[sarahgerweck]

Thanks @eed3si9n: I appreciate the data point. As I said in my previous comment, I have no intention to discourage people from helping, but this no-description PR felt weird, and seemed to be part of a pattern. If I'm wrong, then @xuwei-k like I said initially please feel free to make contributions.