feat(ramp): enable non-evm support for Ramp, buy only

[wachunei]

Description

This PR allows multichain chainId to be used within Ramps. This is possible if the selected networks is non-evm and is supported by Ramp API

Related issues

Fixes:

Manual testing steps

1. Go to this page...

Screenshots/Recordings

Before

After

Pre-merge author checklist

• I’ve followed MetaMask Contributor Docs and MetaMask Mobile Coding Standards.
• I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability
• I’ve included tests if applicable
• I’ve documented my code using JSDoc format if applicable
• I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see labeling guidelines). Not required for external contributors.

Pre-merge reviewer checklist

• I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed).
• I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots.

[github-actions]

Bitrise

❌❌❌ pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline failed on Bitrise! ❌❌❌

Commit hash: 2adf5dd
Build link: https://app.bitrise.io/app/be69d4368ee7e86d/pipelines/43c59818-7739-4874-80e8-5f1966824dd7

Note

• You can kick off another pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline on Bitrise by removing and re-applying the Run Smoke E2E label on the pull request

Tip

• Check the documentation if you have any doubts on how to understand the failure on bitrise

[github-actions]

Bitrise

❌❌❌ pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline failed on Bitrise! ❌❌❌

Commit hash: 9096c02
Build link: https://app.bitrise.io/app/be69d4368ee7e86d/pipelines/3d59af81-9288-421d-a60d-b485415331ce

Note

• You can kick off another pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline on Bitrise by removing and re-applying the Run Smoke E2E label on the pull request

Tip

• Check the documentation if you have any doubts on how to understand the failure on bitrise

[github-actions]

Bitrise

✅✅✅ pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline passed on Bitrise! ✅✅✅

Commit hash: 4f194ba
Build link: https://app.bitrise.io/app/be69d4368ee7e86d/pipelines/ca39b812-c2f5-41aa-90e6-94bceb673fde

Note

• You can kick off another pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline on Bitrise by removing and re-applying the Run Smoke E2E label on the pull request

[github-actions]

Bitrise

❌❌❌ pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline failed on Bitrise! ❌❌❌

Commit hash: efadcd1
Build link: https://app.bitrise.io/app/be69d4368ee7e86d/pipelines/3b6f0217-25a2-469d-97ec-a766034c0703

Note

• You can kick off another pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline on Bitrise by removing and re-applying the Run Smoke E2E label on the pull request

Tip

• Check the documentation if you have any doubts on how to understand the failure on bitrise

[github-actions]

Bitrise

❌❌❌ pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline failed on Bitrise! ❌❌❌

Commit hash: 7330383
Build link: https://app.bitrise.io/app/be69d4368ee7e86d/pipelines/551e9566-01f3-4cd4-8f4d-10c6af205ba3

Note

• You can kick off another pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline on Bitrise by removing and re-applying the Run Smoke E2E label on the pull request

Tip

• Check the documentation if you have any doubts on how to understand the failure on bitrise

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 84.61538% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 63.40%. Comparing base (256bc97) to head (7330383).
Report is 39 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
.../components/UI/Ramp/components/AccountSelector.tsx	81.81%	1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #13718      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   62.91%   63.40%   +0.49%     
==========================================
  Files        2035     2093      +58     
  Lines       44539    45254     +715     
  Branches     6050     6230     +180     
==========================================
+ Hits        28020    28694     +674     
+ Misses      14685    14676       -9     
- Partials     1834     1884      +50     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
95.5% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud