Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

FamilyRelationship #34

Open
RobertJCarroll opened this issue Jun 23, 2021 · 2 comments
Open

FamilyRelationship #34

RobertJCarroll opened this issue Jun 23, 2021 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@RobertJCarroll
Copy link
Contributor

I noticed a difference in the NCPI Family Relationship Profile and my expectations.

The Profile sets a fixed code with the type of relationship, while using the value field to provide more detail. Is there a reason we don't just put the value bindings on the code? The code FAMMEMB doesn't really provide us with any information that's not specified by the profile and what's currently in the value.
@RobertJCarroll
Copy link
Contributor Author

tagging @liberaliscomputing . @torstees and I discussed this before and couldn't come up with anything.

@torstees
Copy link
Collaborator

torstees commented Jul 2, 2021

This really does seem like a more streamlined and clean approach as long as we plan to use those role codes. You can get all of those observations using the profile or even :below

@RobertJCarroll RobertJCarroll moved this to To Evaluate in NCPI FHIR IG Tasks Sep 12, 2022
@RobertJCarroll RobertJCarroll added the enhancement New feature or request label Sep 13, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
NCPI FHIR IG Tasks
Status: To Evaluate
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@torstees @RobertJCarroll