top-level/release-haskell.nix: test static linking as well #124025
Conversation
This way we can keep track of any new regressions to this as well as have some binary cache, so using this infrastructure doesn't require compiling GHC all the time.
| # test some statically linked packages to catch regressions | ||
| # and get some cache going for static compilation with GHC | ||
| pkgsStatic.haskellPackages = { | ||
| inherit (staticHaskellPackagesPlatforms) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
any suggestions on changes to this list? It shouldn't be too big, but some packages which are a) important and b) unlikely to break (or will degrade the quality of haskellPackages significantly if they break). Also maybe some kind of smaller tool which is a bit more complicated than hello could be a good idea.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
not sure if that fits, but pandoc came to my mind
There was a problem hiding this comment.
but probably not exactly a "small" tool..
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think this list looks good for now.
In #122586 (comment), @rnhmjoj mentioned an issue about packages using TemplateHaskell. I wonder if lens uses TemplateHaskell anywhere.
Well, I'll go ahead and merge this in, and we can see what happens.
ofborg
bot
added
10.rebuild-darwin: 0
This way we can keep track of any new regressions to this as well as
have some binary cache, so using this infrastructure doesn't require
compiling GHC all the time.
Motivation for this change
Things done
sandboxinnix.confon non-NixOS linux)nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review wip"./result/bin/)