-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
mujs: 1.2.0 -> 1.3.2 #203664
mujs: 1.2.0 -> 1.3.2 #203664
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I can confirm the nixpkgs-review result on x86_64-linux, even minitube works now. ./result/bin/mujs works.
Maybe reverting commit d592c785c0b2f9fea982ac3fe7b88fdd7c4817fc makes the darwin builders happy?
Updated, thanks for the hint for darwin 👍 Edit: build issue reported upstream ccxvii/mujs#168 |
Think it's quite a simple patch - #203817 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nixpkgs-review
happy, macos 10.15, nixos x86_64 & aarch64. pkgsMusl
& pkgsCross.riscv64
variants build.
Successfully created backport PR #203837 for |
Description of changes
Fixes CVE-2022-44789.
https://git.ghostscript.com/?p=mujs.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/1.3.2
Things done
sandbox = true
set innix.conf
? (See Nix manual)nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD"
. Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage./result/bin/
)nixos/doc/manual/md-to-db.sh
to update generated release notesResult of
nixpkgs-review
run on x86_64-linux 11 package marked as broken and skipped:
1 package failed to build:
35 packages built:
No new failures.