We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
The following sequence of calls results in a sample rate of 384000000:
bladerf_enable_feature(dev, BLADERF_FEATURE_OVERSAMPLE, true); bladerf_rational_rate actual, desired; desired.integer = 96000000; desired.num = 0; desired.den = 1; bladerf_set_rational_sample_rate(dev, BLADERF_TX_CHANNEL, desired, &actual); // assert(actual.integer == desired.integer); // passes bladerf_set_frequency(dev, BLADERF_RF_TX_CHANNEL, 122657000); bladerf_get_rational_sample_rate(dev, BLADERF_RF_TX_CHANNEL, actual);
This also happens with regular old integral bladerf_set_sample_rate().
bladerf_set_sample_rate()
If I swap the order of call so that bladerf_set_frequency() comes first, everything works as expected.
bladerf_set_frequency()
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Are you using a specific release of libbladeRF or whatever the latest was at the time of this post?
Sorry, something went wrong.
The version included in release 2023.02. Checking now, that seems to be 2.5.0.
No branches or pull requests
The following sequence of calls results in a sample rate of 384000000:
This also happens with regular old integral
bladerf_set_sample_rate()
.If I swap the order of call so that
bladerf_set_frequency()
comes first, everything works as expected.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: