-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Patch language tags #295
Patch language tags #295
Conversation
YES!!! Thanks, James. I just tested this on OBI. With this version of COB plugged into the OBI-COB transition,
I tested updating the definitions in I can make PRs as needed to update the definitions for those three terms. James, I'm not sure if you'd prefer to add a commit to this PR to fix the definitions of the two that need to be updated in COB, or if I should create a separate PR to fix those. |
src/ontology/cob.Makefile
Outdated
$(TMPDIR)/merged_imports.owl: $(X_IMPORT_OWL_FILES) | ||
$(ROBOT) merge \ | ||
$(foreach X,$^,--input $(X)) \ | ||
remove --term IAO:0000115 \ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This removes too much. I'll fix it when I'm back to work on Tuesday.
Thanks @sebastianduesing, I'll get back to you on Tuesday. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Two quick Qs for context, I will review again!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I went through it now in more detail, and and looks good to me; I left a few comments here and there but nothing that would change my mind on the approval.
I addressed @matentzn's points. @sebastianduesing: I want to update OBI to match what's here in COB, so I'm ignoring the remaining problems with OBI definitions. There are a few other definitions that are failing the crosscheck test, but we'll work on them separately. This PR is a clear improvement on the last release, so I plan to merge it and make a new release tomorrow. |
That sounds good. I'm happy to move forward with this PR and make those changes in OBI. |
Addresses #293
This PR explicitly sets literals to use either
@en
(preferred) orxsd:string
(when that's what the source uses).@en
annotations to all COB terms@en
for all annotations in thecob-edit.tsv
templatepatch-labels.ru
patch-definitions.ru
robot report
There are still 12 label errors from
make crosscheck
, because at the COB workshop we decided to override these labels (implemented in #288):ENVO:01000813 astronomical body part@en VS geophysical entity@en
GO:0003674 gene product or complex activity@en VS molecular_function
GO:0008150 biological process@en VS biological_process
GO:0110165 cellular anatomical entity VS cellular anatomical structure
MOP:0000543 molecular process VS physico-chemical process
NCBITaxon:131567 cellular organism VS cellular organisms
Judging by the problems we had with this language tag issue, I guess that very few people actually tested #288.