[15.0][IMP] l10n_es_intrastat_report: Improve tests to test an invoice with delivery address in a country other than the country of contact #2890
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
… delivery address in a country other than the country of contact. TT40764
|
What a great day to merge this nice PR. Let's do it! |
OCA-git-bot
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 24, 2023
|
It looks like something changed on |
|
Congratulations, your PR was merged at 1ff2aa7. Thanks a lot for contributing to OCA. ❤️ |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
FWP from 14.0: #2672
Improve tests to test an invoice with delivery address in a country other than the country of contact.
Locked by:
intrastat_product[15.0][FIX] intrastat_product: Set the correct country code when the country of the delivery address is different (and to be consistent with the src_dest_country_id field) intrastat-extrastat#216Please @pedrobaeza and @chienandalu can you review it?
@Tecnativa TT40764