-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13
01 25 2023 Implementers Meeting
- Arran Griffith
- Becky Andresen
- Rosalyn Metz
- Dan Field
- Peter Winkles
- Birkin Diana
- Daniel Salwerowicz
- Tom Wrobel
New Fedora Member
- Dan Field introduced himself and told what he works with in addition to being a Fedora developer.
- He's been working at the National Library of Whales for around 19 years and is currently in the position of Head of Software Engineering.
-
Related to above open issue #86/#88
-
The new S3 transfer manager does not support the same options as existing S3 client. [Issue 86 on ocfl-java (https://github.com/OCFL/ocfl-java/issues/86) and Pull request 88 on ocfl-java.
-
While the new transfer manager and CRT client lead to improvements in S3 performance, there are some issues with it.
-
The new transfer manager requires the new CRT client to run, however the CRT client is, as of now, an async-only client.
-
Previously ocfl-java used the sync S3 client, so it leads to breaking changes for S3 users of ocfl-java.
-
Additionally the CRT client does not support many options, for example path-style access.
-
Some users do use non-native clients and many do use old-style implementations and setops which can lead to issues.
-
This required thorough testing to make sure that none of the S3 users will be negatively affected.
-
There are issues that Becky Andersen has experienced with relation to it.
- One of them being the fact that S3 client returned a generic S3 exception, rather than NoSuchKeyException.
- Becky Andersen has experienced further issues and will be doing further testing to provide more information about them.
-
Might be good idea to find other S3 users and see if they can do some tests on their systems to see if they experience any issues.
-
-
Issue With Empty Files Written To Azure Running BTRFS
- User had an issue with ocfl-java was writing claiming to successfully write files even though the files were actually empty, leading to broken files.
-
-
Ocfl-Java didn't see this issue as it was writing asynchronously, synchronous writing should help with the issue, and it has been already implemented.
-
However it makes the write operations run slower.
-
Need to consider whether ocfl-java should be the one writing synchronously or if it should be configurable option.
-
The source of the issue might be with Azure on Kubernetes and the attached persistent volume configured with BTRFS. It also had a mountoption to "compress" stored files.
-
That was most likely the cause that the write operations failed, as BTRFS might not like the fact that many small files have been written in quick succession.
-
The problem now is that the user now has a lot of files that need to be cleaned up.
-
The other worrying issue is that the error could happen and it would take a while for the user to notice it has happened.
-
So in theory they could go about expecting files to be in order without noticing anything was wrong, making it hard to repair the broken files.
-
-
Peter would like input on making this function configurable, and what the default should be.
- Feedback from Daniel Salwerowicz is to make the old option, asynchronous writing, the default, and synchronous writing an opt-in.
As Becky pointed out the process of updating from OCFL version 1.0 to 1.1 has been very easy thanks to good documentation provided by Peter.
None
- Arran to correct and send invite to those missing it.