Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[0d Tensor] update scatter for zero-dimension tensor #49279

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Dec 26, 2022

Conversation

sljlp
Copy link
Contributor

@sljlp sljlp commented Dec 22, 2022

PR types

New features

PR changes

Others

Describe

1.Revert #48638 and change concat to stack for zero-dimension tensor in communication apis.
2.Make stack kernel support the same data types as concat kernel

@paddle-bot
Copy link

paddle-bot bot commented Dec 22, 2022

你的PR提交成功,感谢你对开源项目的贡献!
请关注后续CI自动化测试结果,详情请参考Paddle-CI手册
Your PR has been submitted. Thanks for your contribution!
Please wait for the result of CI firstly. See Paddle CI Manual for details.

@sljlp sljlp changed the title Simply static scatter for zero-dimention tensor Simply static scatter for zero-dimension tensor Dec 22, 2022
@sljlp sljlp force-pushed the simply_scatter_static branch 7 times, most recently from 5f71a20 to 43244ca Compare December 23, 2022 10:16
@sljlp sljlp changed the title Simply static scatter for zero-dimension tensor [0d Tensor] scatter for zero-dimension tensor Dec 24, 2022
@sljlp sljlp changed the title [0d Tensor] scatter for zero-dimension tensor [0d Tensor] update scatter for zero-dimension tensor Dec 24, 2022
Copy link
Contributor

@LiYuRio LiYuRio left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Contributor

@zhwesky2010 zhwesky2010 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants