Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[StandaloneExe] add strategy force_sequential_run #52652

Merged

Conversation

kangguangli
Copy link
Contributor

@kangguangli kangguangli commented Apr 7, 2023

PR types

Others

PR changes

APIs

Describe

Add a new BuildStrategy: force_sequential_run, which will let the operations run by the order in the Program.

Other

Pcard-67004

@paddle-bot
Copy link

paddle-bot bot commented Apr 7, 2023

你的PR提交成功,感谢你对开源项目的贡献!
请关注后续CI自动化测试结果,详情请参考Paddle-CI手册
Your PR has been submitted. Thanks for your contribution!
Please wait for the result of CI firstly. See Paddle CI Manual for details.

@kangguangli kangguangli force-pushed the add_force_sequential_run_mode branch from 67e0cfc to 7c3cd59 Compare April 7, 2023 13:05
Copy link
Contributor

@From00 From00 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A better config name is required.
We already have a config FLAGS named sequential_run, therefore force_sequential_run is confusing. It is recommended to reuse the existing name since they have the same semantics.

@kangguangli
Copy link
Contributor Author

A better config name is required. We already have a config FLAGS named sequential_run, therefore force_sequential_run is confusing. It is recommended to reuse the existing name since they have the same semantics.

@zhiqiu Do you have any suggestions? I'll change the name in next PR.

@kangguangli kangguangli merged commit e1692dc into PaddlePaddle:develop Apr 8, 2023
@kangguangli kangguangli deleted the add_force_sequential_run_mode branch April 8, 2023 12:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants