Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Saga View window scroll is not consistent #356

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 18, 2015
Merged

Saga View window scroll is not consistent #356

merged 1 commit into from
May 18, 2015

Conversation

johnsimons
Copy link
Member

  • Scrolling up and down the Saga View with the scroll option is fine (either with the mouse or with the up/down arrows

image

  • However, the scroll behavior is erratic, and its size changes (see below and compare to the above)

image

UX impressions

  • In general the experience of navigating up/down with the mouse holding down the scroll control is a good enough UX
  • Clicking with the mouse on the scroll to bring it to a location does not provide a consistent behavior
  • Pressing the up/down (or page up/down) buttons also generates unpredictable results and is not a good UX.

Proposed Fix

  • Make the clicking on the the scroll area and pressing the up/down button behave similarly to holding down the mouse button and dragging the scroller to the requested location.

@johnsimons
Copy link
Member

Funny I mention this to @distantcam yesterday

@johnsimons johnsimons added this to the 1.2.8 milestone May 7, 2015
@johnsimons
Copy link
Member

@distantcam this one is ready for review

@distantcam distantcam modified the milestone: 1.2.8 May 8, 2015
@johnsimons johnsimons merged commit 08d62da into master May 18, 2015
@johnsimons johnsimons added this to the 1.2.9 milestone May 18, 2015
@johnsimons johnsimons deleted the Issue_356 branch May 18, 2015 03:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants