Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

checkpoint for the test #27

Open
gcxamy opened this issue Mar 4, 2023 · 6 comments
Open

checkpoint for the test #27

gcxamy opened this issue Mar 4, 2023 · 6 comments

Comments

@gcxamy
Copy link

gcxamy commented Mar 4, 2023

hello, I think your work is really excellent.
Well, it is a little difficult for me to train s3dis, could you offer me your checkpoint? Thank you so much.

@Gofinge
Copy link
Member

Gofinge commented Mar 4, 2023

Sure, here is the download link (for the released config). According to feedback from issues, the released 3-stage config is not stable. Maybe a 4-stage config as the original paper is better.

@Yukichiii
Copy link

Hi, could you also share the checkpoint for ScanNet v2 20 ? It will be really helpful. Thanks a lot!

@Gofinge
Copy link
Member

Gofinge commented Mar 15, 2023

Sure, here. The checkpoint is used for codebase released reproduced result.

@EricLina
Copy link

EricLina commented Apr 13, 2023

Sure, here is the download link (for the released config). According to feedback from issues, the released 3-stage config is not stable. Maybe a 4-stage config as the original paper is better.

According to the 3-stage settings, I ran the refine version of the 3-stage ptv2m2 on S3DIS with TotalBatchSize = 4 (2 A100/40G), but the results obtained are slightly lower.

Is this due to three-stage instability, or is it because of my Batchsize problem?

  mIoU mAcc OA
V2m2_reproduce 70.44 76.51 90.79
V2m2_paper 71.6 77.9 91.1

@YOOOOOL
Copy link

YOOOOOL commented Oct 20, 2023

Thank you for your work. Could you please provide the checkpoint of spconv_unet in s3dis and scannet data sets? My computing resources are limited

@OmSh01
Copy link

OmSh01 commented Feb 20, 2024

Hello, thank you for your work. Could you also provide the checkpoint for semantic kitti please?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants