-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 86
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Tutorial housekeeping: Build repetition codes #1157
Conversation
Check out this pull request on See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks. Powered by ReviewNB |
Hi @beckykd, could you please run the notebook and commit with fresh output so I could review the changes? |
…pdate-build-repetition-codes
…pdate-build-repetition-codes
Thanks for contributing to Qiskit documentation! Before your PR can be merged, it will first need to pass continuous integration tests and be reviewed. Sometimes the review process can be slow, so please be patient. Thanks! 🙌 |
Looks great! my comments:
|
I added all the updates except this. Working on figuring out an appropriate example. |
My take on this is that it's not crucial to demonstrate utlity scale for QEC examples because that hasn't be the focus of IBM utility-scale experiments to date: they have all been about things like trotterized Hamiltonian simulations with mitigation. If this direction is mandatory, the repetition code could be kept, but repeated to more than three qubits. The routing would get quite a bit more complicated. But also, there would be a tonne of conditional if statements which are quite slow especially when done serially, and degrade the quality of the experiment. However, pushing this strategy too far would make the example feel contrived, and the results would not be great, I expect. |
Closes #1137
FYI @RoyElkabetz