chore: Test support for object renaming (#3130)

## Changes
- Added integration tests to show the inconsistency between ShowByID
errors
- Added acceptance tests to show different behaviors of objects after
renaming higher-hierarchy objects
- Added generated models for database and schema
- Added new test command to Makefile that runs the tests (they're
separated from the CI tests by env variable that has to be enabled to
run the tests)

## TODO
- Pick the important tests that should be running with other acceptance
tests
- Transform shallow hierarchy tests into parametrized ones (similar to
what we have right now in deep hierarchy test).

Makefile

@@ -76,6 +76,9 @@ test-architecture: ## check architecture constraints between packages
 test-client: ## runs test that checks sdk.Client without instrumentedsql
 	SF_TF_NO_INSTRUMENTED_SQL=1 SF_TF_GOSNOWFLAKE_LOG_LEVEL=debug go test ./pkg/sdk/internal/client/... -v
 
+test-object-renaming: ## runs tests in object_renaming_acceptance_test.go
+	TEST_SF_TF_ENABLE_OBJECT_RENAMING=1 go test ./pkg/resources/object_renaming_acceptace_test.go -v
+
 test-acceptance-%: ## run acceptance tests for the given resource only, e.g. test-acceptance-Warehouse
 	TF_ACC=1 TF_LOG=DEBUG SF_TF_ACC_TEST_CONFIGURE_CLIENT_ONCE=true go test -run ^TestAcc_$*_ -v -timeout=20m ./pkg/resources
 

pkg/acceptance/bettertestspoc/assert/resourceassert/gen/resource_schema_def.go

@@ -41,6 +41,10 @@ var allResourceSchemaDefs = []ResourceSchemaDef{
 		name:   "View",
 		schema: resources.View().Schema,
 	},
+	{
+		name:   "Database",
+		schema: resources.Database().Schema,
+	},
 	{
 		name:   "DatabaseRole",
 		schema: resources.DatabaseRole().Schema,
@@ -53,6 +57,10 @@ var allResourceSchemaDefs = []ResourceSchemaDef{
 		name:   "RowAccessPolicy",
 		schema: resources.RowAccessPolicy().Schema,
 	},
+	{
+		name:   "Schema",
+		schema: resources.Schema().Schema,
+	},
 	{
 		name:   "MaskingPolicy",
 		schema: resources.MaskingPolicy().Schema,

pkg/acceptance/bettertestspoc/config/config.go

@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ type ResourceModel interface {
 	SetResourceName(name string)
 	ResourceReference() string
 	DependsOn() []string
-	SetDependsOn(values []string)
+	SetDependsOn(values ...string)
 }
 
 type ResourceModelMeta struct {
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ func (m *ResourceModelMeta) DependsOn() []string {
 	return m.dependsOn
 }
 
-func (m *ResourceModelMeta) SetDependsOn(values []string) {
+func (m *ResourceModelMeta) SetDependsOn(values ...string) {
 	m.dependsOn = values
 }
 
@@ -99,6 +99,15 @@ func FromModel(t *testing.T, model ResourceModel) string {
 	return s
 }
 
+func FromModels(t *testing.T, models ...ResourceModel) string {
+	t.Helper()
+	var sb strings.Builder
+	for _, model := range models {
+		sb.WriteString(FromModel(t, model) + "\n")
+	}
+	return sb.String()
+}
+
 // ConfigVariablesFromModel constructs config.Variables needed in acceptance tests that are using ConfigVariables in
 // combination with ConfigDirectory. It's necessary for cases not supported by FromModel, like lists of objects.
 func ConfigVariablesFromModel(t *testing.T, model ResourceModel) tfconfig.Variables {