Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Problem editing information on review screen User: bug #21

Closed
suffolklitlab-issues opened this issue Jul 30, 2021 · 3 comments
Closed
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@suffolklitlab-issues
Copy link

   
Question ID civil_docketing_statement review screen
Steps to reproduce Tried to go back and edit an answer (party name)
Expected behavior let me change answer
What happened instead Clicked the green EDIT button next to field I wanted to edit and nothing happened. (Using Google Chrome browser)
Other information it would be helpful to offer the full and complete form in blank so user either can download and print that to complete manually or with other applications, OR, so user can see where the form Q&A is heading and know what is being requested so they give best answers
Variable being sought review_civil_docketing_statement
Package version 0.0.5
@nonprofittechy
Copy link
Member

@BryceStevenWilley is this still your form? It would be helpful to know which field the user had trouble editing, but this is worth taking a look at

@nonprofittechy nonprofittechy changed the title User: bug Problem editing information on review screen User: bug Jul 31, 2021
@nonprofittechy nonprofittechy added the bug Something isn't working label Jul 31, 2021
@BryceStevenWilley
Copy link
Collaborator

Yep, I think I've fixed it in https://github.com/SuffolkLITLab/docassemble-AppealsCivilDocketingStatement/tree/review_fixes, I just need to throw it on the Test server and make sure it holds up.

Some of the changes could be moved up to AssemblyLine, specifically the default revisit screen for ALPeopleList objects, and maybe the default tables for ALIndividuals?

Also, not quite sure how we should address the second comment:

it would be helpful to offer the full and complete form in blank so user either can download and print that to complete manually or with other applications, OR, so user can see where the form Q&A is heading and know what is being requested so they give best answers

I made an issue on AssemblyLine with my thoughts, it fits better there.

@BryceStevenWilley
Copy link
Collaborator

This has been merged, tested, and pushed to prod.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants