Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add electronics/coulombs law module #840

Open
wants to merge 21 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
183 changes: 183 additions & 0 deletions src/electronics/coulombs_law.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,183 @@
/// Apply Coulomb's Law on any three given values. These can be force, charge1,
/// charge2, or distance, and then in a Python dict return name/value pair of
/// the zero value.
///
/// Coulomb's Law states that the magnitude of the electrostatic force of
/// attraction or repulsion between two point charges is directly proportional
/// to the product of the magnitudes of charges and inversely proportional to
/// the square of the distance between them.
///
/// -> Wikipedia reference: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coulomb%27s_law

const COULOMBS_CONSTANT: f64 = 8.9875517923e9;
#[derive(PartialEq, Eq, Debug)]
pub enum CoulombsLawError {
ExtraZeroArg(String),
NegativeDistance(String),
}
pub fn coulombs_law(
force: f64,
charge1: f64,
charge2: f64,
distance: f64,
) -> Result<String, CoulombsLawError> {
let charge_product = (charge1 * charge2).abs();

if invalid_arguments(force, charge1, charge2, distance) {
return Err(CoulombsLawError::ExtraZeroArg(String::from(
"One and only one argument must be 0",
)));
}

if distance < 0.0 {
return Err(CoulombsLawError::NegativeDistance(String::from(
"Distance cannot be negative",
)));
}

if force == 0.0 {
return Ok(format!(
"force: {}",
calculate_force(charge_product, distance)
));
} else if charge1 == 0.0 {
return Ok(format!(
"charge1: {}",
calculate_charge(charge2, force, distance)
));
} else if charge2 == 0.0 {
return Ok(format!(
"charge2: {}",
calculate_charge(charge1, force, distance)
));
}
Ok(format!(
"distance: {}",
calculate_distance(charge_product, force)
))
}
Comment on lines +18 to +58
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this function really needed? If you insist on having it, please consider using Optional as inputs.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

using optional would not cause boiler plate ?
in this situation i should double check value of inputs (none or some and sign of inputs)

fn calculate_distance(charge_product: f64, force: f64) -> f64 {
(COULOMBS_CONSTANT * charge_product / force.abs()).sqrt()
}
fn calculate_charge(charge: f64, force: f64, distance: f64) -> f64 {
force.abs() * distance.powi(2) / (COULOMBS_CONSTANT * charge)
}
fn calculate_force(charge_product: f64, distance: f64) -> f64 {
COULOMBS_CONSTANT * charge_product / distance.powi(2)
}

fn invalid_arguments(force: f64, charge1: f64, charge2: f64, distance: f64) -> bool {
[force, charge1, charge2, distance]
.iter()
.filter(|&&x| x == 0.0)
.count()
!= 1
}

#[cfg(test)]
mod tests {
use super::*;

macro_rules! test_calculate_force {
($($name:ident: $inputs:expr,)*) => {
$(
#[test]
fn $name() {
let ((charge_product,distance), expected) = $inputs;
assert_eq!(calculate_force(charge_product,distance), expected);
}
)*
}
}

macro_rules! test_calculate_charge {
($($name:ident: $inputs:expr,)*) => {
$(
#[test]
fn $name() {
let ((charge,force,distance), expected) = $inputs;
assert_eq!(calculate_charge(charge,force,distance), expected);
}
)*
}
}
macro_rules! test_calculate_distance {
($($name:ident: $inputs:expr,)*) => {
$(
#[test]
fn $name() {
let ((charge_product,force), expected) = $inputs;
assert_eq!(calculate_distance(charge_product,force), expected);
}
)*
}
}

macro_rules! test_invalid_arguments {
($($name:ident: $inputs:expr,)*) => {
$(
#[test]
fn $name() {
let ((force,charge1,charge2,distance), expected) = $inputs;
assert_eq!(invalid_arguments(force,charge1,charge2,distance), expected);
}
)*
}
}
macro_rules! test_coulombs_law {
($($name:ident: $inputs:expr,)*) => {
$(
#[test]
fn $name() {
let ((force,charge1,charge2,distance), expected) = $inputs;
assert_eq!(coulombs_law(force,charge1,charge2,distance).unwrap(), String::from(expected));
}
)*
}
}

macro_rules! test_coulombs_law_err {
($($name:ident: $inputs:expr,)*) => {
$(
#[test]
fn $name() {
let ((force,charge1,charge2,distance), expected) = $inputs;
assert_eq!(coulombs_law(force,charge1,charge2,distance).unwrap_err(), expected);
}
)*
}
}

test_coulombs_law! {
general_inputs1:((0.0, 3.0, 5.0, 2000.0), "force: 33703.319221125"),
general_inputs2:((10.0, 3.0, 5.0, 0.0), "distance: 116109.11974711547"),
general_inputs3:((10.0, 0.0, 5.0, 2000.0), "charge1: 0.0008901200443544508"),
general_inputs4:((10.0, 5.0,0.0 , 2000.0), "charge2: 0.0008901200443544508"),
}

test_coulombs_law_err! {
extra_zero_arg_err: ((0.0, 3.0, 0.0, 2000.0), CoulombsLawError::ExtraZeroArg(String::from("One and only one argument must be 0"))),
negative_distance_err: ((0.0, 3.0, 5.0, -2000.0), CoulombsLawError::NegativeDistance(String::from("Distance cannot be negative"))),
}

test_invalid_arguments! {
valid_argument_input: ((0.0, 3.0, 5.0, 2000.0), false),
invalid_argument_input: ((0.0, 0.0, 5.0, 2000.0), true),
all_argument_zero: ((0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0), true),
}

test_calculate_force! {
force_test1: ((15.0,2000.0),33703.319221125),
force_test2: ((18.0,0.12),11234439740375.0),
}

test_calculate_charge! {
charge_test1: ((15.0,6.0,2000.0),0.00017802400887089018),
charge_test2: ((18.0,3.0,0.12),2.6703601330633526e-13),
}

test_calculate_distance! {
distance_test1: ((15.0,5.0),164203.09186157244),
distance_test2: ((18.0,11.0),121272.02040394374),
}
}
2 changes: 2 additions & 0 deletions src/electronics/mod.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
mod coulombs_law;
pub use coulombs_law::coulombs_law;
2 changes: 2 additions & 0 deletions src/lib.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -8,13 +8,15 @@ pub mod compression;
pub mod conversions;
pub mod data_structures;
pub mod dynamic_programming;
pub mod electronics;
pub mod financial;
pub mod general;
pub mod geometry;
pub mod graph;
pub mod greedy;
pub mod machine_learning;
pub mod math;
pub mod matrix;
pub mod navigation;
pub mod number_theory;
pub mod searching;
Expand Down
2 changes: 2 additions & 0 deletions src/matrix/mod.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
mod search_in_a_sorted_matrix;
pub use search_in_a_sorted_matrix::search_in_a_sorted_matrix;
97 changes: 97 additions & 0 deletions src/matrix/search_in_a_sorted_matrix.rs
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this file relevant in this PR? If not, please remove it.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
///find row and column of given key in given matrix
/// m is row count and n is column count
#[derive(PartialEq, Eq, Debug)]
pub struct SortedMatrixResult {
pub column: i64,
pub row: i64,
}
#[derive(PartialEq, Eq, Debug)]
pub enum SortedMatrixErr {
KeyNotFound,
InvalidArgument(String),
}
pub fn search_in_a_sorted_matrix(
mat: Vec<Vec<f64>>,
m: usize,
n: usize,
key: f64,
) -> Result<SortedMatrixResult, SortedMatrixErr> {
if m < 1 {
return Err(SortedMatrixErr::InvalidArgument(String::from(
"m must be greater than or equal to 1",
)));
}

if n < 1 {
return Err(SortedMatrixErr::InvalidArgument(String::from(
"n must be greater than or equal to 1",
)));
}

if mat.is_empty() {
return Err(SortedMatrixErr::InvalidArgument(String::from(
"mat must be non-empty",
)));
}

let (mut i, mut j) = (m - 1, 0);

while j < n {
if (mat[i][j] - key).abs() < f64::EPSILON {
return Ok(SortedMatrixResult {
column: (j + 1) as i64,
row: (i + 1) as i64,
});
}
if key < mat[i][j] {
i -= 1;
} else {
j += 1;
}
}
Err(SortedMatrixErr::KeyNotFound)
}
#[cfg(test)]
mod tests {
use super::*;
macro_rules! test_search_in_a_sorted_matrix_err {
($($name:ident: $inputs:expr,)*) => {
$(
#[test]
fn $name() {
let ((mat,m,n,key), expected) = $inputs;
assert_eq!(search_in_a_sorted_matrix(mat,m,n,key).unwrap_err(), expected);
}
)*
}
}
macro_rules! test_search_in_a_sorted_matrix {
($($name:ident: $inputs:expr,)*) => {
$(
#[test]
fn $name() {
let ((mat,m,n,key), expected) = $inputs;
assert_eq!(search_in_a_sorted_matrix(mat,m,n,key).unwrap(), expected);
}
)*
}
}

test_search_in_a_sorted_matrix_err! {
key_not_found_test: ((vec![vec![1.0,1.0],vec![1.0,1.0]],2,2,4.0), SortedMatrixErr::KeyNotFound),
invalid_m_test: ((vec![vec![1.0,1.0],vec![1.0,1.0]],0,2,4.0), SortedMatrixErr::InvalidArgument(String::from("m must be greater than or equal to 1"))),
invalid_n_test: ((vec![vec![1.0,1.0],vec![1.0,1.0]],2,0,4.0), SortedMatrixErr::InvalidArgument(String::from("n must be greater than or equal to 1"))),
invalid_mat_test: ((vec![],2,1,4.0), SortedMatrixErr::InvalidArgument(String::from("mat must be non-empty"))),
}

test_search_in_a_sorted_matrix! {
kgeneral_test1: ((vec![vec![2.1, 5.0, 7.0], vec![4.0, 8.0, 13.0], vec![9.0, 11.0, 15.0], vec![12.0, 17.0, 20.0]], 3, 3, 2.1), SortedMatrixResult{
row:1,
column:1
}),
kgeneral_test2: (( vec![vec![2.0, 5.0, 7.0], vec![4.0, 8.0, 13.0], vec![9.0, 11.0, 15.0], vec![12.0, 17.0, 20.0]], 3, 3, 5.0), SortedMatrixResult{
row:1,
column:2
}),
}
}