Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Discussion of Tutorial 2.1 #176

Open
stevevanhooser opened this issue May 27, 2021 · 8 comments
Open

Discussion of Tutorial 2.1 #176

stevevanhooser opened this issue May 27, 2021 · 8 comments
Labels
Discussion Discussion "issues" that remain open

Comments

@stevevanhooser
Copy link
Contributor

Enter your comments, questions, bugs, or discussion items for Tutorial 2.1 here.

@stevevanhooser stevevanhooser added the Discussion Discussion "issues" that remain open label May 27, 2021
@KellyZhangL

This comment has been minimized.

@stevevanhooser

This comment has been minimized.

@KellyZhangL

This comment has been minimized.

@KellyZhangL

This comment has been minimized.

@stevevanhooser
Copy link
Contributor Author

So, we've got to figure out why there aren't any epochs. If you don't see any epochs of data in 2.1.4.4, then none of the things going forward will work.

One possibility is that you've got some stale objects left over from when ndi.daq.metadata.epochprobemap_daqsystem was entered. Let's try to clear those out with:

S.database_clear('yes');
Then do

S = ndi.session.dir('ts_exper1',[prefix filesep 'ts_exper1'])

And resume from 2.4.1.3.

If there aren't any epochs, try looking at the files in your ts_exper1 directory by doing:

ls ([prefix filesep 'ts_exper1'])

and you should see t00001, t00002, t00003, t00004, etc...

@KellyZhangL

This comment has been minimized.

@andrewhu02

This comment has been minimized.

@stevevanhooser

This comment has been minimized.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Discussion Discussion "issues" that remain open
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants