Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Discussion of Tutorial 2.5 #180

Open
stevevanhooser opened this issue May 27, 2021 · 5 comments
Open

Discussion of Tutorial 2.5 #180

stevevanhooser opened this issue May 27, 2021 · 5 comments
Labels
Discussion Discussion "issues" that remain open

Comments

@stevevanhooser
Copy link
Contributor

Enter your comments, questions, bugs, or discussion items for Tutorial 2.5 here.

@stevevanhooser stevevanhooser changed the title Tutorial 2.5 Discussion of Tutorial 2.5 May 27, 2021
@stevevanhooser stevevanhooser added the Discussion Discussion "issues" that remain open label May 27, 2021
@KellyZhangL
Copy link
Collaborator

2.5.3
q_stim = ndi.query('document_class.class_name','contains_string','stim','');
stim_docs = S.database_search(q_stim)
returns 62 matches for me, instead of 35

@KellyZhangL
Copy link
Collaborator

Codeblock 2.5.5.1 I get a graph that looks like attached image (I'm unable to zoom in or zoom out either).
ndi database_graph

@stevevanhooser
Copy link
Contributor Author

2.5.3
q_stim = ndi.query('document_class.class_name','contains_string','stim','');
stim_docs = S.database_search(q_stim)
returns 62 matches for me, instead of 35

I see the problem. Running the orientation/tuning function multiple times generates new documents even if matching documents already exist. I'll have to fix that. Thanks!

@stevevanhooser
Copy link
Contributor Author

Codeblock 2.5.5.1 I get a graph that looks like attached image (I'm unable to zoom in or zoom out either).

I added some instructions to describe the zoom process. See if those help?

@KellyZhangL
Copy link
Collaborator

KellyZhangL commented Jun 3, 2021

Thanks! Typing in zoom on and zoom off worked for me. I also realized I typed in interactive = 1; rather than interactive = 0; which might be why my figure was appearing differently.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Discussion Discussion "issues" that remain open
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants