-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Running a profile analysis on code block 2.4.5.1 #183
Comments
Hi Kelly - Do I understand correctly that there seems to be some problem running this with the profiler? (That is, if you run it with the profiler off, it runs fine, but it returns an error when the profiler is being used?) Thanks |
I retried it this morning with |
OK, is it possible that in the new run, you didn't select spikes for the cluster? It seems like the "neurons" don't have any activity in them. |
That definitely is possible since I only assigned a quality label in the spike sorter app without doing anything else. |
Issue solved! The error was me not selecting spikes for the clusters beforehand. I was wondering, if I selected different spike clusters, would my graphs in this code block look different? |
Yes, in many cases. These recordings show very well isolated neurons; but, if there were multiple clusters and the neurons that they represented had different properties, then the results would differ. |
Running a profile analysis on code block 2.4.5.1
for i=1:2, tdoc{i} = oapp.calculate_tuning_curve(e{i}); oriprops{i} = oapp.calculate_all_oridir_indexes(e{i}); end;
is returning the following error:
Warning: Matrix is singular to working precision.
Warning: Matrix is singular to working precision.
Warning: Matrix is singular to working precision.
Warning: Matrix is singular to working precision.
Warning: Matrix is singular to working precision.
The figures appear as attached.
Originally posted by @KellyZhangL in #179 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: