-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
propose new standard names in CF table #17
Comments
I think according to the discussion in cf-convention/vocabularies#24 we should not introduce new area_fraction standard names but change the standard names of the area_fraction variables to |
@gnikulin |
It took time to read all long discussions in the CF issues mentioned. It seems that the right way is indeed to use |
What to do with |
Agreed, we can be more precise in the long names which are not controlled. |
I opened a PR to close this issue (#22). I'll assume we'll use Should we use the term |
Yes, We should use We still need to check what can be used for lakes. There is area type |
Ok, i think |
we should propose and discuss the new standard names that we have in the data request here. If i do:
i get:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: