-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 348
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Consider , as a standalone operator in Rust #8
Comments
Wilfred
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 6, 2021
Update LINE_BREAK_OPERATORS characters
Wilfred
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 3, 2022
Previously, the grammar incorrectly parsed lambdas when the first arg was a function type. This was a general conflict between parenthesized expressions, lambda expressions, and anonymous expressions (note that lambda and anonymous expressions naturally overlap). This was solved by indirectly editing precedence through concatenating function type arg tokens.
igorclark
pushed a commit
to igorclark/difftastic
that referenced
this issue
Mar 28, 2022
jbr
pushed a commit
to jbr/difftastic
that referenced
this issue
Mar 30, 2022
* make locals.scm queries more granular * split out (label) nodes from (identifier) * run formatter * use (label) for labeled params nodes * capture all (label)s as properties
ido77778
pushed a commit
to ido77778/difftastic
that referenced
this issue
May 3, 2022
grunweg
pushed a commit
to grunweg/difftastic
that referenced
this issue
May 5, 2023
Add test for Wilfred#7
Duologic
pushed a commit
to Duologic/difftastic
that referenced
this issue
Mar 22, 2024
* support 'tailstrict' call annotation This is used in the standard jsonnet library (std.jsonnet) test plan: make test * add node for tailstrict
bernhard-herzog
pushed a commit
to bernhard-herzog/difftastic
that referenced
this issue
May 2, 2024
Add makefile
crbelaus
pushed a commit
to crbelaus/difftastic
that referenced
this issue
Nov 25, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Otherwise we think
>,
is an operator. We probably still want && as a single operator though.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: