-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 888
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use daemon thread and replace time.sleep
with Event.wait
#3224
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@panh99 can you share your opinion on this from the Python docs
My understanding is that background thread may potentially not be released and this could actually create issues.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@tanertopal @danieljanes It's true that bg thread may potentially be cleaned up properly if it's a daemon thread.
But in fact, the two threads can safely be daemon threads because they don't have critical tasks that must be cleaned up properly. In addition, the two threads can exit gracefully if the ClientApp exit gracefully, which will not cause the problem you mentioned.
The purpose of this change is that non-daemon threads now prevent the process from shutting down (i.e., invalidating
kill
orpkill
). In the event that users useCtrl + C
orkill/pkill
to terminate the ClientApp process, the main thread will terminate abruptly, without flagging stop events for the two threads. One of them, the heartbeat thread, will always be alive if the stop event is not flagged.Here's a more detailed explanation from chat gpt.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok, I understand. Overall, I am ok with this change. We should discuss another time how we can make sure passing signals for graceful shutdown globally could be improved.