Skip to content

Conversation

@nv-tusharma
Copy link
Contributor

@nv-tusharma nv-tusharma commented Jul 10, 2025

Reverts #1860

#1860

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated internal references and documentation to use NIXL version 0.3.1 instead of 0.4.0.
    • No changes to application features or user interface.

@nv-tusharma nv-tusharma changed the title Revert "chore: update nixl to 0.4.0 release" build: Revert "chore: update nixl to 0.4.0 release" Jul 10, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added the build label Jul 10, 2025
@nv-tusharma nv-tusharma enabled auto-merge (squash) July 10, 2025 22:52
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 10, 2025

Walkthrough

This change downgrades the NIXL dependency from version 0.4.0 to 0.3.1 across documentation, build scripts, and Rust dependency specifications. The commit hash for NIXL is updated in the build script, and the support matrix documentation reflects the new version alignment. No other logic or features are modified.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
container/build.sh Updated NIXL_COMMIT hash to point to v0.3.1 commit
docs/support_matrix.md Downgraded NIXL version from 0.4.0 to 0.3.1 in tables
lib/llm/Cargo.toml Downgraded nixl-sys dependency from 0.4.0 to 0.3.1

Possibly related PRs

Poem

A bunny hopped through versioned fields,
Downgrading nixl, as the changelog yields.
From 0.4.0, we step back in time,
To 0.3.1—oh, how sublime!
With hashes aligned and docs in tow,
The burrow’s dependencies now smoothly flow.
🐇✨


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
container/build.sh (1)

117-119: Pin hash with context / tag or make it configurable.

NIXL_COMMIT=3503658e… is now hard-coded without a comment explaining the exact upstream tag (presumably v0.3.1).
Future maintainers will have no clue which release this belongs to.

Consider:

- NIXL_COMMIT=3503658e71143b56f9d5b1b440d84a94b9c41af8
+ # v0.3.1 tag (2025-04-16)
+ NIXL_COMMIT=${NIXL_COMMIT:-3503658e71143b56f9d5b1b440d84a94b9c41af8}

This documents the provenance and still allows overriding via env var.

docs/support_matrix.md (1)

84-86: Keep build-dependency footnote numbering in sync.

The table footnotes ¹ and ² were left unchanged; verify they still point to the correct rows after editing.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 13640e1 and f219acd.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
  • Cargo.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
  • lib/bindings/python/Cargo.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • container/build.sh (1 hunks)
  • docs/support_matrix.md (1 hunks)
  • lib/llm/Cargo.toml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (1)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: kthui
PR: ai-dynamo/dynamo#1424
File: lib/runtime/src/pipeline/network/egress/push_router.rs:204-209
Timestamp: 2025-06-13T22:07:24.843Z
Learning: The codebase uses async-nats version 0.40, not the older nats crate. Error handling should use async_nats::error::Error variants, not nats::Error variants.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (4)
  • GitHub Check: pre-merge-rust (lib/bindings/python)
  • GitHub Check: pre-merge-rust (lib/runtime/examples)
  • GitHub Check: pre-merge-rust (.)
  • GitHub Check: Build and Test - vllm
🔇 Additional comments (2)
lib/llm/Cargo.toml (1)

91-95: nixl-sys 0.3.1 downgrade verified – no breaking APIs in use

A ripgrep check for the known 0.4.0–only symbols (kv_cache::, NixlError::, set_global_allocator) returned zero matches in lib/. The downgrade to 0.3.1 should compile without re-introducing removed symbols.

docs/support_matrix.md (1)

76-77: Double-check glibc minimum stays aligned with binary wheels.

The downgrade bumped NIXL to 0.3.1 but kept the glibc floor at >=2.27.
If the new wheel you ship was built on manylinux_2_28, the requirement should stay >=2.28. Please verify.

@nv-tusharma nv-tusharma disabled auto-merge July 10, 2025 23:29
@nv-tusharma nv-tusharma enabled auto-merge (squash) July 10, 2025 23:29
@nv-tusharma nv-tusharma merged commit 1704b12 into main Jul 10, 2025
15 of 17 checks passed
@nv-tusharma nv-tusharma deleted the revert-1860-anants/nixl-040 branch July 10, 2025 23:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants