From dc8efd4cec920b3974c3d09562f76a03c9ea0e64 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: ChrisBAshton <christopher.ashton@digital.cabinet-office.gov.uk>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 10:21:32 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Bump octokit version to work around Faraday issue

Without this, we get failing builds with:

```
NameError: uninitialized constant Faraday::Error::ClientError
Did you mean?  Faraday::ClientError
```

This is documented in https://github.com/octokit/octokit.rb/pull/1154.
---
 Gemfile.lock | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Gemfile.lock b/Gemfile.lock
index bf7fcd7..f380cff 100644
--- a/Gemfile.lock
+++ b/Gemfile.lock
@@ -34,7 +34,8 @@ GEM
     hashdiff (0.3.7)
     method_source (0.9.2)
     multipart-post (2.1.1)
-    octokit (4.13.0)
+    octokit (4.22.0)
+      faraday (>= 0.9)
       sawyer (~> 0.8.0, >= 0.5.3)
     pry (0.12.2)
       coderay (~> 1.1.0)