From 5357886fa2f3b396bcdc1b3599dc03277bad0e1a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Michael Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 17:32:26 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] Fixed link formatting on documentation. The link was showing up as [text](link) rather than actually displaying the formatted link. I removed the bold formatting so it would get formatted properly. Would an @link be more appropriate here though? --- docs/content/guide/directive.ngdoc | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/docs/content/guide/directive.ngdoc b/docs/content/guide/directive.ngdoc index 581a0f7e5b2..fa9cf1659fd 100644 --- a/docs/content/guide/directive.ngdoc +++ b/docs/content/guide/directive.ngdoc @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ mirrors the process of compiling source code in Before we can write a directive, we need to know how Angular's {@link guide/compiler HTML compiler} determines when to use a given directive. -Similar to the terminology used when an [element **matches** a selector] +Similar to the terminology used when an [element matches a selector] (https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Element.matches), we say an element **matches** a directive when the directive is part of its declaration.