Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[Subtask]: Extract a common interface to support more table format. #1846

Closed
3 tasks done
Tracked by #1269
baiyangtx opened this issue Aug 15, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #1852
Closed
3 tasks done
Tracked by #1269

[Subtask]: Extract a common interface to support more table format. #1846

baiyangtx opened this issue Aug 15, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #1852
Labels
type:subtask Subtask of another issue

Comments

@baiyangtx
Copy link
Contributor

Search before asking

  • I have searched in the issues and found no similar issues.

Description

The current API design is oriented towards iceberg/mixed-iceberg. Many core codes are deeply coupled with Iceberg. In the future, the need to adapt to more formats will require us to abstract the Catalog and Table API again.

Parent issue

#1269

Are you willing to submit PR?

  • Yes I am willing to submit a PR!

Code of Conduct
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
type:subtask Subtask of another issue
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
1 participant
@baiyangtx