Skip to content

Conversation

@crepererum
Copy link
Contributor

@crepererum crepererum commented Jun 16, 2025

Which issue does this PR close?

Rationale for this change

Consistency.

What changes are included in this PR?

Rename.

Are there any user-facing changes?

Users should use the new name, but the old name is kept as a deprecated alias for now.

Copy link
Contributor

@alamb alamb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you @crepererum - this looks good to me

@alamb
Copy link
Contributor

alamb commented Jun 17, 2025

FWIW I think we could also close the ticket (even though there is an alias) but I don't feel strongly

See #339. The old name is kept as a deprecated alias for now.
@crepererum crepererum force-pushed the crepererum/issue_339_a branch from 1b2d792 to ee54d26 Compare June 17, 2025 10:56
@crepererum crepererum merged commit 40d30c6 into main Jun 17, 2025
8 checks passed
@alamb alamb deleted the crepererum/issue_339_a branch June 17, 2025 14:39
crepererum added a commit to crepererum/arrow-rs-object-store that referenced this pull request Jul 10, 2025
See apache#339. The old name is kept as a deprecated alias for now.
@crepererum crepererum mentioned this pull request Jul 10, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants