Skip to content

Conversation

@petern48
Copy link
Contributor

@petern48 petern48 commented Nov 1, 2025

Which issue does this PR close?

Rationale for this change

Convenience method for when parsing has already been done, and we want to start from a an expr object instead of SQL string.

What changes are included in this PR?

Are these changes tested?

Added test

Are there any user-facing changes?

Yes, new public api.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the core Core DataFusion crate label Nov 1, 2025
@petern48 petern48 force-pushed the create_logical_expr_from_sql_expr branch from c718319 to 20f53ab Compare November 1, 2025 05:57
@petern48 petern48 marked this pull request as ready for review November 1, 2025 15:05
Copy link
Contributor

@rkrishn7 rkrishn7 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @petern48! Looks good to me, although will need someone who can merge to sign off

let query = SqlToRel::new_with_options(&provider, state.get_parser_options());

for sql in ["[1,2,3]", "a > 10", "SUM(a)"] {
let sql_expr = state.sql_to_expr(sql, &dialect).unwrap();
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The api name is strange to me first, I think it wants to say "sql string to expr"

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, it can be a bit ambiguous. Either way, sql_to_expr is an existing public API before this PR.

@alamb alamb added this pull request to the merge queue Nov 9, 2025
@alamb
Copy link
Contributor

alamb commented Nov 9, 2025

Thanks @petern48 and @xudong963

Merged via the queue into apache:main with commit 0e6be30 Nov 9, 2025
28 checks passed
@petern48 petern48 deleted the create_logical_expr_from_sql_expr branch November 9, 2025 15:34
codetyri0n pushed a commit to codetyri0n/datafusion that referenced this pull request Nov 11, 2025
…ache#18423)

## Which issue does this PR close?

<!--
We generally require a GitHub issue to be filed for all bug fixes and
enhancements and this helps us generate change logs for our releases.
You can link an issue to this PR using the GitHub syntax. For example
`Closes apache#123` indicates that this PR will close issue apache#123.
-->

- Closes apache#18278

## Rationale for this change

<!--
Why are you proposing this change? If this is already explained clearly
in the issue then this section is not needed.
Explaining clearly why changes are proposed helps reviewers understand
your changes and offer better suggestions for fixes.
-->
Convenience method for when parsing has already been done, and we want
to start from a an expr object instead of SQL string.

## What changes are included in this PR?

<!--
There is no need to duplicate the description in the issue here but it
is sometimes worth providing a summary of the individual changes in this
PR.
-->


## Are these changes tested?

<!--
We typically require tests for all PRs in order to:
1. Prevent the code from being accidentally broken by subsequent changes
2. Serve as another way to document the expected behavior of the code

If tests are not included in your PR, please explain why (for example,
are they covered by existing tests)?
-->
Added test

## Are there any user-facing changes?

<!--
If there are user-facing changes then we may require documentation to be
updated before approving the PR.
-->
Yes, new public api.
<!--
If there are any breaking changes to public APIs, please add the `api
change` label.
-->
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

core Core DataFusion crate

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add SessionState::create_logical_expr_from_sql_expr

4 participants