-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 348
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[#5582] improvement(hadoop3-filesystem): Remove configuration fs.gvfs.filesystem.providers
from GVFS client.
#5634
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
if (resultMap.containsKey(fileSystemProvider.scheme())) { | ||
throw new UnsupportedOperationException( | ||
String.format( | ||
"File system provider: '%s' with scheme '%s' already exists in the use provider list " |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
"File system provider: '%s' with scheme '%s' already exists in the use provider list " | |
"File system provider: '%s' with scheme '%s' already exists in the provider list, " |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
done
throw new UnsupportedOperationException( | ||
String.format( | ||
"File system provider: '%s' with scheme '%s' already exists in the use provider list " | ||
+ "Please make sure the file system provider scheme is unique.", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
+ "Please make sure the file system provider scheme is unique.", | |
+ "please make sure the filesystem provider scheme is unique.", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
done
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Configuration
fs.gvfs.filesystem.providers
is redundant, so we'd better remove this configuation.Why are the changes needed?
This configuration is redundant.
Fix: #5582
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
N/A
How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.