Show list of users with current status (consented, blocking or none)

[qris]

In Cambridge K1 we were discussing how we want to do consensus-based decision making. We want to facilitate online users (who may be nervous) to take part in the process. So the facilitator needs to know:

• who has consented
• who is blocking
• who hasn't participated

In order for this to be generalised and for "consent" and "block" not to have magical hard-coded meanings, I propose that we add a per-organisation priority list of "special" states. For example, in K1 we might set this list to the following, in this order:

• consent
• danger (I wish we had "block")

Then, if a user has any "consent" feedback on the proposal, they are considered to be in the "consent" state (just for this proposal).

If they have no "consent" feedback, it looks for the next type, "danger" in our case, and if they have any of those, they are considered to be in the "danger" state.

If they have no "danger" feedback either, then it's run out of feedbacks to search, so they are in the "undecided" state.

If this proposal doesn't get any objections and nobody implements it first, I may do it myself for K1.

[jogwen]

https://aptivate.kanbantool.com/boards/5986-econsensus#tasks-1497947