-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(route53): replace existing record sets #20416
Conversation
Add a `deleteExisting` prop to `RecordSet` to delete an existing record set before deploying the new one. This is useful if you want to minimize downtime and avoid "manual" actions while deploying a stack with a record set that already exists. This is typically the case for record sets that are not already "owned" by CloudFormation or "owned" by another stack or construct that is going to be deleted (migration).
new route53.ARecord(this, 'ARecord', { | ||
zone: myZone, | ||
target: route53.RecordTarget.fromIpAddresses('1.2.3.4', '5.6.7.8'), | ||
deleteExisting: true, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In the beginning I thought that upsert
would have been a good name for this prop, but it's not a real UPSERT operation?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The existing name is definitely better.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the PR!
new route53.ARecord(this, 'ARecord', { | ||
zone: myZone, | ||
target: route53.RecordTarget.fromIpAddresses('1.2.3.4', '5.6.7.8'), | ||
deleteExisting: true, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The existing name is definitely better.
If you don't know the ID of the Hosted Zone to import, you can use the | ||
If you don't know the ID of the Hosted Zone to import, you can use the |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good catch!
Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from main and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork). |
AWS CodeBuild CI Report
Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository |
Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from main and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork). |
Add a `deleteExisting` prop to `RecordSet` to delete an existing record set before deploying the new one. This is useful if you want to minimize downtime and avoid "manual" actions while deploying a stack with a record set that already exists. This is typically the case for record sets that are not already "owned" by CloudFormation or "owned" by another stack or construct that is going to be deleted (migration). ---- ### All Submissions: * [x] Have you followed the guidelines in our [Contributing guide?](https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md) ### Adding new Unconventional Dependencies: * [ ] This PR adds new unconventional dependencies following the process described [here](https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md/#adding-new-unconventional-dependencies) ### New Features * [x] Have you added the new feature to an [integration test](https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/blob/master/INTEGRATION_TESTS.md)? * [x] Did you use `yarn integ` to deploy the infrastructure and generate the snapshot (i.e. `yarn integ` without `--dry-run`)? *By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license*
Add a
deleteExisting
prop toRecordSet
to delete an existing recordset before deploying the new one. This is useful if you want to minimize
downtime and avoid "manual" actions while deploying a stack with a
record set that already exists. This is typically the case for record
sets that are not already "owned" by CloudFormation or "owned" by
another stack or construct that is going to be deleted (migration).
All Submissions:
Adding new Unconventional Dependencies:
New Features
yarn integ
to deploy the infrastructure and generate the snapshot (i.e.yarn integ
without--dry-run
)?By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license