Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(s2n-quic-qns): add client perf implementation #1345

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 3, 2022

Conversation

camshaft
Copy link
Contributor

@camshaft camshaft commented Jun 3, 2022

Description of changes:

This change adds a perf client implementation to s2n-quic-qns. This initial version is basic but it at least gives us a perf client.

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

@camshaft camshaft marked this pull request as ready for review June 3, 2022 16:48
Comment on lines 38 to -43
#[structopt(long, default_value)]
tls: TlsProviders,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this was used to explicitly enable rustls vs s2n-tls. it breaks perf and it is also used in run_endpoint.sh which is used in interop to select the tls provider

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ah right. i will remove it there since i don't think the differences are all that interesting.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ah right. i will remove it there since i don't think the differences are all that interesting.

@camshaft camshaft force-pushed the camshaft/perf-client branch 2 times, most recently from ff2ca47 to 1448daa Compare June 3, 2022 17:37
@camshaft camshaft merged commit 6d41761 into main Jun 3, 2022
@camshaft camshaft deleted the camshaft/perf-client branch June 3, 2022 19:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants