Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New Pattern: aws-apigateway-kinesisstream #51

Closed
1 task done
dscpinheiro opened this issue Sep 2, 2020 · 1 comment
Closed
1 task done

New Pattern: aws-apigateway-kinesisstream #51

dscpinheiro opened this issue Sep 2, 2020 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
feature-request A feature should be added or improved

Comments

@dscpinheiro
Copy link
Contributor

dscpinheiro commented Sep 2, 2020

This new pattern is similar to the existing aws-apigateway-sqs, but the service integration is with Kinesis Data Streams.

Use Case

API Gateway provides a layer of abstraction from the streaming storage (Kinesis Data Streams). This layer of abstraction enables custom authentication approaches and control quotas for specific data producers.

Proposed Solution

The new pattern will use this documentation page as a reference: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/apigateway/latest/developerguide/integrating-api-with-aws-services-kinesis.html

Other

  • 👋 I may be able to implement this feature request

This is a 🚀 Feature Request

@dscpinheiro dscpinheiro added feature-request A feature should be added or improved needs-triage The issue or PR still needs to be triaged labels Sep 2, 2020
@hnishar hnishar added in-progress This issue is being actively worked on and removed needs-triage The issue or PR still needs to be triaged labels Sep 9, 2020
@hnishar hnishar removed the in-progress This issue is being actively worked on label Sep 10, 2020
@hnishar
Copy link
Contributor

hnishar commented Sep 10, 2020

This has been pushed out in the latest release v1.62.0

@hnishar hnishar closed this as completed Sep 10, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature-request A feature should be added or improved
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants