We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
libsecp256k1 is fairly mature these days. It seems like it would be appropriate to begin versioning the API/ABI and tagging releases.
Already, configure warns that experimental APIs don't have stable APIs, which implies that non-experimental features do.
If you want, I can prepare a PR to setup the necessary autotools stuff.
Also need to select an initial version number. Does 1.0 sound good?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
There's agreement here that we should have a tagged release soon, see the most recent comments in #286.
What would be the necessary autotools stuff?
(I'm closing this since it's essentially a duplicate of #286, feel free to reply there. )
Sorry, something went wrong.
Basically -version in LDFLAGS
-version
No branches or pull requests
libsecp256k1 is fairly mature these days. It seems like it would be appropriate to begin versioning the API/ABI and tagging releases.
Already, configure warns that experimental APIs don't have stable APIs, which implies that non-experimental features do.
If you want, I can prepare a PR to setup the necessary autotools stuff.
Also need to select an initial version number. Does 1.0 sound good?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: